Benchmark Almanac

Hypersim

Qwen3.5-9B 13.5 leads since March 2026
Fading

Models localize named objects as 3D boxes in synthetic indoor Hypersim images, using the Omni3D test split. Scored by mAP at IoU 0.15.

A dataset used by Qwen as a 3D grounding test, not a standalone LLM benchmark.

Released
November 2020
Kind
Detection and captioning
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B #77 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
March 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
March 2026

In the authors’ words

For many fundamental scene understanding tasks, it is difficult or impossible to obtain per-pixel ground truth labels from real images. We address this challenge by introducing Hypersim, a photorealistic synthetic dataset for holistic indoor scene understanding. To create our dataset, we leverage a large repository of synthetic scenes created by professional artists, and we generate 77,400 images of 461 indoor scenes with detailed per-pixel labels and corresponding ground truth geometry. Our dataset: (1) relies exclusively on publicly available 3D assets; (2) includes complete scene geometry, material information, and lighting information for every scene; (3) includes dense per-pixel semantic instance segmentations and complete camera information for every image; and (4) factors every image into diffuse reflectance, diffuse illumination, and a non-diffuse residual term that captures view-dependent lighting effects. We analyze our dataset at the level of scenes, objects, and pixels, and we analyze costs in terms of money, computation time, and annotation effort. Remarkably, we find that it is possible to generate our entire dataset from scratch, for roughly half the cost of training a popular open-source natural language processing model. We also evaluate sim-to-real transfer performance on two real-world scene understanding tasks - semantic segmentation and 3D shape prediction - where we find that pre-training on our dataset significantly improves performance on both tasks, and achieves state-of-the-art performance on the most challenging Pix3D test set. All of our rendered image data, as well as all the code we used to generate our dataset and perform our experiments, is available online.

Abstract of Hypersim: A Photorealistic Synthetic Dataset for Holistic Indoor Scene Understanding (arXiv:2011.02523, CC0)
9
Models scored in lab cards
9
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Qwen3.5-9B leads with 13.5 among models released by February 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3.5-9B 13.5
  2. 2 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 13.1
  3. 3 Qwen3.5-27B 13.0
  4. 4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 12.7
  5. 5 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 12.5
  6. 6 Qwen3.5-4B 12.5
  7. 7 Qwen3.5-2B 12.4
  8. 8 Qwen3.5-0.8B 11.9
  9. 9 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 11.0

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5-9B 13.5 Mar 2026 Lab model card
2 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 13.1 Feb 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5-27B 13.0 Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 12.7 Feb 2026 Lab model card
5 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 12.5 Feb 2026 Lab model card
6 Qwen3.5-4B 12.5 Mar 2026 Lab model card
7 Qwen3.5-2B 12.4 Mar 2026 Lab model card
8 Qwen3.5-0.8B 11.9 Mar 2026 Lab model card
9 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 11.0 Sep 2025 Lab model card

4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2026
Qwen3.5-9B 13.5

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 2026 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 2026

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in March 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-0.8B 11.9 Hypersim 11.9/11.0 (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-2B 12.4 Hypersim 12.4/12.4 (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-4B 12.5 Hypersim
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-9B 13.5 Hypersim
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 13.1 Hypersim
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-27B 13 Hypersim
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 12.7 Hypersim
Feb 16, 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 12.5 Hypersim
Sep 23, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 11 Hypersim

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Nov 26, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 11 Hypersim, 3D grounding (Table 2) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%