Hypersim
Models localize named objects as 3D boxes in synthetic indoor Hypersim images, using the Omni3D test split. Scored by mAP at IoU 0.15.
A dataset used by Qwen as a 3D grounding test, not a standalone LLM benchmark.
- Made by
- Apple (dataset), Meta AI (Omni3D split)
- Released
- November 2020
- Kind
- Detection and captioning
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B #77 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- March 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- March 2026
In the authors’ words
For many fundamental scene understanding tasks, it is difficult or impossible to obtain per-pixel ground truth labels from real images. We address this challenge by introducing Hypersim, a photorealistic synthetic dataset for holistic indoor scene understanding. To create our dataset, we leverage a large repository of synthetic scenes created by professional artists, and we generate 77,400 images of 461 indoor scenes with detailed per-pixel labels and corresponding ground truth geometry. Our dataset: (1) relies exclusively on publicly available 3D assets; (2) includes complete scene geometry, material information, and lighting information for every scene; (3) includes dense per-pixel semantic instance segmentations and complete camera information for every image; and (4) factors every image into diffuse reflectance, diffuse illumination, and a non-diffuse residual term that captures view-dependent lighting effects. We analyze our dataset at the level of scenes, objects, and pixels, and we analyze costs in terms of money, computation time, and annotation effort. Remarkably, we find that it is possible to generate our entire dataset from scratch, for roughly half the cost of training a popular open-source natural language processing model. We also evaluate sim-to-real transfer performance on two real-world scene understanding tasks - semantic segmentation and 3D shape prediction - where we find that pre-training on our dataset significantly improves performance on both tasks, and achieves state-of-the-art performance on the most challenging Pix3D test set. All of our rendered image data, as well as all the code we used to generate our dataset and perform our experiments, is available online.
Qwen3.5-9B leads with 13.5 among models released by February 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1
Qwen3.5-9B 13.5
- 2
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 13.1
- 3
Qwen3.5-27B 13.0
- 4
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 12.7
- 5
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 12.5
- 6
Qwen3.5-4B 12.5
- 7
Qwen3.5-2B 12.4
- 8
Qwen3.5-0.8B 11.9
- 9
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 11.0
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 13.5 | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 13.1 | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 13.0 | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 12.7 | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 12.5 | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 12.5 | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 12.4 | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 11.9 | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 11.0 | Sep 2025 | Lab model card |
4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in March 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2026 | 11.9 | Hypersim 11.9/11.0 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 12.4 | Hypersim 12.4/12.4 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 12.5 | Hypersim | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 13.5 | Hypersim | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 13.1 | Hypersim | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 13 | Hypersim | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 12.7 | Hypersim | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 12.5 | Hypersim | |
| Sep 23, 2025 | 11 | Hypersim |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 11 | Hypersim, 3D grounding (Table 2) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%