KoBALT
Models answer 700 expert-written multiple-choice questions on 24 Korean linguistic phenomena in syntax, semantics, pragmatics, phonology and morphology.
Questions have little n-gram overlap with standard Korean corpora, to limit contamination.
- Released
- May 2025
- Kind
- Reasoning in many languages
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet #118 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- April 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- April 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We introduce KoBALT (Korean Benchmark for Advanced Linguistic Tasks), a comprehensive linguistically-motivated benchmark comprising 700 multiple-choice questions spanning 24 phenomena across five linguistic domains: syntax, semantics, pragmatics, phonetics/phonology, and morphology. KoBALT is designed to advance the evaluation of large language models (LLMs) in Korean, a morphologically rich language, by addressing the limitations of conventional benchmarks that often lack linguistic depth and typological grounding. It introduces a suite of expert-curated, linguistically motivated questions with minimal n-gram overlap with standard Korean corpora, substantially mitigating the risk of data contamination and allowing a more robust assessment of true language understanding. Our evaluation of 20 contemporary LLMs reveals significant performance disparities, with the highest-performing model achieving 61% general accuracy but showing substantial variation across linguistic domains - from stronger performance in semantics (66%) to considerable weaknesses in phonology (31%) and morphology (36%). Through human preference evaluation with 95 annotators, we demonstrate a strong correlation between KoBALT scores and human judgments, validating our benchmark's effectiveness as a discriminative measure of Korean language understanding. KoBALT addresses critical gaps in linguistic evaluation for typologically diverse languages and provides a robust framework for assessing genuine linguistic competence in Korean language models.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 61% among models released by March 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
K-EXAONE leads with 61.8%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in March 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 61.0 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 52.0 Claude-3-5-sonnet (snapshot unspecified)
- 47.0 DeepSeek-V3-XL
- 44.0 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 43.0 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified)
- 37.0
Qwen2.5-72B
- 36.0 C4ai-command-a-03
- 35.0
Gemma 3 27B
- 32.0 Mistral-Small-24B
- 32.0
Llama 3.3 70B
- 30.0
Qwen2.5-32B
- 25.0
Aya Expanse 32B
- 21.0
Gemma 2 9B
- 19.0
Qwen2.5-7B
- 19.0
Aya Expanse 8B
- 17.0
Llama 3.1-8B
- 17.0
Ministral 8B
- 12.0
Mistral 7B v0.3
- 1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 61%
- 2 Claude-3-5-sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 52%
- 3 DeepSeek-V3-XL 47%
- 4 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 44%
- 5 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) 43%
- 6
Qwen2.5-72B 37%
- 7 C4ai-command-a-03 36%
- 8
Gemma 3 27B 35%
- 9 Mistral-Small-24B 32%
- 10
Llama 3.3 70B 32%
- 11
Qwen2.5-32B 30%
- 12
Aya Expanse 32B 25%
- 13
Gemma 2 9B 21%
- 14
Qwen2.5-7B 19%
- 15
Aya Expanse 8B 19%
- 16
Llama 3.1-8B 17%
- 17
Ministral 8B 17%
- 18
Mistral 7B v0.3 12%
Source: Official KoBALT leaderboard
- 1
K-EXAONE 61.8%
- 2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 61%
- 3
EXAONE 4.5 33B 52.1%
- 4
Solar Open 100B 44.3%
- 5
Qwen2.5-72B 37%
- 6
Gemma 3 27B 35%
- 7
Llama 3.3 70B 32%
- 8
Qwen2.5-32B 30%
- 9
Aya Expanse 32B 25%
- 10
Gemma 2 9B 21%
- 11
Qwen2.5-7B 19%
- 12
Aya Expanse 8B 19%
- 13
Llama 3.1-8B 17%
- 14
Ministral 8B 17%
- 15
Mistral 7B v0.3 12%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official KoBALT leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 61% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | Claude-3-5-sonnet (snapshot unspecified) | 52% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | DeepSeek-V3-XL | 47% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 44% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) | 43% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | | 37% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | C4ai-command-a-03 | 36% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | | 35% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Mistral-Small-24B | 32% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 32% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 30% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 25% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 21% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 19% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 19% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 17% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 17% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 12% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 61.8% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 61% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 52.1% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 44.3% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 37% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 35% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 32% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 30% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 25% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 21% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 19% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 19% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 17% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 17% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 12% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official KoBALT leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official KoBALT leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026 | 52.1 | KoBALT | |
| Dec 31, 2025 | 44.3 | KoBALT | |
| Dec 31, 2025 | 61.8 | KoBALT |
3 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026 | | 52.1 | KoBALT (Table 3, Reasoning mode) | Capabilities |
| Jan 11, 2026 | | 44.3 | KoBALT (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Jan 5, 2026 | | 61.8 | KoBALT (Table 3, Reasoning mode). Non-reasoning 49.1 (Table 4) | Capabilities |
More in Multilingual
- MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
- WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET.
K-EXAONE 90.5%
- MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language.
Qwen3.7-Max 87%
- CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories.
Solar Open 2 90.7%
- Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 90.1%
- MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%