Benchmark Almanac

KoBALT

Claude 3.7 Sonnet 61% leads since May 2025
K-EXAONE 61.8% leads since December 2025
Fading

Models answer 700 expert-written multiple-choice questions on 24 Korean linguistic phenomena in syntax, semantics, pragmatics, phonology and morphology.

Questions have little n-gram overlap with standard Korean corpora, to limit contamination.

Released
May 2025
Kind
Reasoning in many languages
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3.7 Sonnet #118 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
April 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
April 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce KoBALT (Korean Benchmark for Advanced Linguistic Tasks), a comprehensive linguistically-motivated benchmark comprising 700 multiple-choice questions spanning 24 phenomena across five linguistic domains: syntax, semantics, pragmatics, phonetics/phonology, and morphology. KoBALT is designed to advance the evaluation of large language models (LLMs) in Korean, a morphologically rich language, by addressing the limitations of conventional benchmarks that often lack linguistic depth and typological grounding. It introduces a suite of expert-curated, linguistically motivated questions with minimal n-gram overlap with standard Korean corpora, substantially mitigating the risk of data contamination and allowing a more robust assessment of true language understanding. Our evaluation of 20 contemporary LLMs reveals significant performance disparities, with the highest-performing model achieving 61% general accuracy but showing substantial variation across linguistic domains - from stronger performance in semantics (66%) to considerable weaknesses in phonology (31%) and morphology (36%). Through human preference evaluation with 95 annotators, we demonstrate a strong correlation between KoBALT scores and human judgments, validating our benchmark's effectiveness as a discriminative measure of Korean language understanding. KoBALT addresses critical gaps in linguistic evaluation for typologically diverse languages and provides a robust framework for assessing genuine linguistic competence in Korean language models.

Abstract of KoBALT: Korean Benchmark For Advanced Linguistic Tasks (arXiv:2505.16125, CC0)
18
Entries on its own leaderboard, 12 models we track
3
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
3
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 61% among models released by March 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

K-EXAONE leads with 61.8%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in March 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 61%
  2. 2 Claude-3-5-sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 52%
  3. 3 DeepSeek-V3-XL 47%
  4. 4 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 44%
  5. 5 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) 43%
  6. 6 Qwen2.5-72B 37%
  7. 7 C4ai-command-a-03 36%
  8. 8 Gemma 3 27B 35%
  9. 9 Mistral-Small-24B 32%
  10. 10 Llama 3.3 70B 32%
  11. 11 Qwen2.5-32B 30%
  12. 12 Aya Expanse 32B 25%
  13. 13 Gemma 2 9B 21%
  14. 14 Qwen2.5-7B 19%
  15. 15 Aya Expanse 8B 19%
  16. 16 Llama 3.1-8B 17%
  17. 17 Ministral 8B 17%
  18. 18 Mistral 7B v0.3 12%

Source: Official KoBALT leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 61% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Claude-3-5-sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 52% Official leaderboard
3 DeepSeek-V3-XL 47% Official leaderboard
4 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 44% Official leaderboard
5 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) 43% Official leaderboard
6 Qwen2.5-72B 37% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
7 C4ai-command-a-03 36% Official leaderboard
8 Gemma 3 27B 35% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Mistral-Small-24B 32% Official leaderboard
10 Llama 3.3 70B 32% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen2.5-32B 30% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Aya Expanse 32B 25% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Gemma 2 9B 21% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen2.5-7B 19% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Aya Expanse 8B 19% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
16 Llama 3.1-8B 17% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Ministral 8B 17% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
18 Mistral 7B v0.3 12% Sep 2023 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 K-EXAONE 61.8% Dec 2025 Lab model card
2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 61% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
3 EXAONE 4.5 33B 52.1% Apr 2026 Lab model card
4 Solar Open 100B 44.3% Dec 2025 Lab model card
5 Qwen2.5-72B 37% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Gemma 3 27B 35% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Llama 3.3 70B 32% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen2.5-32B 30% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Aya Expanse 32B 25% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Gemma 2 9B 21% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen2.5-7B 19% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Aya Expanse 8B 19% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Llama 3.1-8B 17% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
14 Ministral 8B 17% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Mistral 7B v0.3 12% Sep 2023 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 3 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in May 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Anthropic LG AI Research
Own leaderboard Not tested since May 2025
Lab claims Not tested since Apr 2026
K-EXAONE 61.8%

Sources: Official KoBALT leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) K-EXAONE Claude 3.7 Sonnet Qwen2.5-72B Qwen2.5-32B Gemma 2 9B Mistral 7B v0.3 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) K-EXAONE Qwen2.5-72B

Sources: Official KoBALT leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

LG AI Research
Upstage
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Apr 9, 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B 52.1 KoBALT
Dec 31, 2025 Solar Open 100B 44.3 KoBALT
Dec 31, 2025 K-EXAONE 61.8 KoBALT

3 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Apr 9, 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B technical report 52.1 KoBALT (Table 3, Reasoning mode) Capabilities
Jan 11, 2026 Solar Open 100B technical report 44.3 KoBALT (Table 5) Capabilities
Jan 5, 2026 K-EXAONE technical report 61.8 KoBALT (Table 3, Reasoning mode). Non-reasoning 49.1 (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Multilingual

All 120 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 90.1%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%