LAB: Contracts
500 in-house contracting tasks (drafting, redlines, issues lists, escalation memos) across 10 contract categories. All-pass expert-rubric grading.
Scores reported on a 50-task official hold-out. No public leaderboard as of the Tenet post (2026-08), so every score is Harvey's own run. Each negotiation stage is graded as a separate step, so it does not yet test autonomous end-to-end negotiation.
- Made by
- Harvey
- Released
- June 2026
- Kind
- Law
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
No scores here yet
No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for LAB: Contracts yet.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4% - HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7% - KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5% - KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%