Benchmark Almanac

LAB: US Case Law

Not in model cards

Agents draft a litigation brief for the same party and motion as a real filed federal brief, from the case record. Model judges compare briefs pairwise and wins become Elo ratings.

100 environments built from RECAP dockets and CourtListener opinions. Each runs closed-book with cited cases supplied or open-book with a CourtListener MCP. Opus 5.5 rated highest at launch.

Made by
Harvey
Released
October 2026
Kind
Law
Level
Expert
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended

No scores here yet

No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for LAB: US Case Law yet.

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 179 in Law, finance and medicine
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy. Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%