- Best of HLE (Text-only), no tools / HLE (Text-only), w/ tools 44.9
- AIME25, no tools 94.5
- HMMT25, no tools 89.4
- IMO-AnswerBench, no tools 78.6
- GPQA, no tools 84.5
- MMLU-Pro, no tools 84.6
- MMLU-Redux, no tools 94.4
- Longform Writing, no tools 73.8
- HealthBench, no tools 58
- BrowseComp, w/ tools 60.2
- BrowseComp-ZH, w/ tools 62.3
- Seal-0, w/ tools 56.3
- FinSearchComp-T3, w/ tools 47.4
- Frames, w/ tools 87
- SWE-bench Verified, w/ tools 71.3
- SWE-bench Multilingual, w/ tools 61.1
- Multi-SWE-bench, w/ tools 41.9
- SciCode, no tools 44.8
- LiveCodeBenchV6, no tools 83.1
- OJ-Bench (cpp), no tools 48.7
- Terminal-Bench, w/ simulated tools (JSON) 47.1
Kimi K2 Thinking
Kimi K2 Thinking places in the top three on 4 benchmarks.
Kimi K2 Thinking
Open weights Flagship
- Terminal-Bench 2.0 35.7% #27 /43
- SciCode 44.8% #19 /49
- MultiChallenge 55.4% #25 /42
Where it ranks
Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.
Knowledge and language
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Redux | 94.4% | #5 of 45 | Lab model card | |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.6% | #37 of 167 | Lab model card | |
| FRAMES | 87% | #2 of 9 | Lab model card | |
| Seal-0 | 56.3% | #2 of 7 | Lab model card | |
| Creative Writing v3 | 73.3 | #36 of 120 | Official leaderboard | |
| Longform Creative Writing (EQ-Bench) | 69.0 | #43 of 119 | Official leaderboard | |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 44.9% | #56 of 154 | Lab model card | |
| CL-bench | 17.6% | #14 of 24 | Official leaderboard | |
| MultiChallenge | 55.4% | #25 of 42 | Official leaderboard | |
| SkateBench v2 | 43.9% | #16 of 21 | Official leaderboard | |
| Longform Writing | 73.8% | #1 of 1 | Lab model card |
Math and science
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMT 2025 | 91% | #6 of 40 | Official leaderboard | |
| AIME 2025 | 94.5% | #24 of 143 | Lab model card | |
| CMIMC 2025 | 90.6% | #6 of 33 | Official leaderboard | |
| BRUMO 2025 | 93.3% | #15 of 42 | Official leaderboard | |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | #83 of 229 | Epoch AI run | |
| FrontierMath | 21.4% | #23 of 55 | Official leaderboard | |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | #93 of 212 | Epoch AI run | |
| HMMT 2025 | 89.4% | #24 of 54 | Lab model card | |
| HiPhO | 57.2% | #16 of 36 | Official leaderboard | |
| General365 | 53% | #13 of 23 | Official leaderboard | |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | 89.2% | #14 of 22 | Official leaderboard | |
| SimpleBench | 39.6% | #76 of 106 | Official leaderboard | |
| IMO-AnswerBench | 78.6% | #27 of 37 | Lab model card | |
| MathArena Apex Shortlist | 47.3% | #31 of 38 | Official leaderboard | |
| SnorkelSequences | 36% | #23 of 25 | Official leaderboard | |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | #52 of 55 | Epoch AI run | |
| MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) | 0% | #47 of 47 | Official leaderboard |
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OJBench | 48.7% | #4 of 16 | Lab model card | |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 83.1% | #25 of 90 | Lab model card | |
| METR Time Horizon | 58 min | #10 of 31 | Official leaderboard | |
| SciCode | 44.8% | #19 of 49 | Lab model card | |
| SWE-bench Verified | 63.4% | #27 of 60 | Official leaderboard | |
| Multi-SWE-bench | 41.9% | #6 of 10 | Lab model card | |
| WeirdML | 42.8% | #68 of 112 | Official leaderboard | |
| Bird-SQL | 59.9% | #8 of 13 | Official leaderboard | |
| Snorkel Agentic Coding | 36.8% | #7 of 11 | Official leaderboard | |
| CF-Div2-Stepfun | 67.9% | #6 of 8 | Official leaderboard | |
| ALE-Bench | 1,103 | #95 of 126 | Official leaderboard | |
| DesignArena Website | 1,106 | #115 of 151 | Official leaderboard | |
| OTelBench | 7.25% | #11 of 14 | Official leaderboard | |
| WebDev Arena | 1,337 | #85 of 105 | WebDev Arena Leaderboard, via Epoch AI | |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 61.1% | #60 of 73 | Lab model card | |
| OpenHands Index | 41% | #28 of 33 | Official leaderboard | |
| PostTrainBench | 7.25% | #23 of 23 | Official leaderboard |
Agents and tools
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 47.1% | #3 of 22 | Lab model card | |
| SnakeBench | 29 | #46 of 188 | Official leaderboard | |
| Step Race | 3 | #15 of 59 | Official leaderboard | |
| Elimination Game | 4 | #26 of 56 | Official leaderboard | |
| SnorkelWordle | 85% | #10 of 19 | Official leaderboard | |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 35.7% | #27 of 43 | Official leaderboard | |
| BrowseComp-ZH | 62.3% | #12 of 19 | Lab model card | |
| BrowseComp | 60.2% | #58 of 81 | Lab model card | |
| Pencil Puzzle Bench | 0% | #39 of 53 | Official leaderboard | |
| BalatroBench | 5.47 | #12 of 16 | Official leaderboard | |
| AgencyBench | 34.2% | #7 of 9 | Official leaderboard | |
| Agent Poker Bench | 1,012 | #14 of 17 | Official leaderboard | |
| VITA-Bench | 12.8% | #15 of 18 | Official leaderboard | |
| Toolathlon | 17.6% | #42 of 50 | Official leaderboard | |
| EnterpriseOps-Gym | 22.4% | #11 of 12 | Official leaderboard | |
| ClawProBench | 47.8% | #45 of 49 | Official leaderboard | |
| RWSearch | 63% | #7 of 7 | Official leaderboard |
Professional work
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaseLaw v2 | 65.7% | #11 of 53 | Official leaderboard | |
| ProfBench | 48.9% | #32 of 72 | Official leaderboard | |
| SnorkelUnderwrite | 71.3% | #13 of 27 | Official leaderboard | |
| FinQA (Snorkel OpenEnv environment) | 71.7% | #12 of 22 | Official leaderboard | |
| SnorkelFinance | 71.7% | #12 of 22 | Official leaderboard | |
| HealthBench | 58% | #17 of 31 | Lab model card | |
| TaxEval v2 | 71.7% | #71 of 129 | Official leaderboard | |
| CorpFin v2 | 60.6% | #67 of 119 | Official leaderboard | |
| Vals Finance Agent v1 | 26% | #28 of 47 | Official leaderboard | |
| LegalBench | 80.2% | #85 of 138 | Official leaderboard | |
| PRBench | 40.9% | #34 of 48 | Official leaderboard | |
| Physical-Engineering's Last Exam | 0.06 | #13 of 18 | Official leaderboard | |
| Finance Reasoning (Snorkel) | 35% | #16 of 21 | Official leaderboard | |
| Vals Finance Agent | 36.6% | #41 of 49 | Official leaderboard | |
| prinzbench | 22.0 | #22 of 26 | Official leaderboard | |
| APEX-Agents | 4.00% | #8 of 8 | Official leaderboard | |
| FinSearchComp | 47.4% | #7 of 7 | Lab model card |
Safety and security
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioTIER Permit | 99.9% | #3 of 69 | Official leaderboard | |
| Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) | 65.7% | #13 of 35 | Official leaderboard | |
| Human Pathogen Capabilities Test | 52.4% | #42 of 86 | Official leaderboard | |
| Human Pathogen Capabilities Test v2 (HPCT v2) | 50.4% | #42 of 71 | Official leaderboard | |
| Molecular Biology Capabilities Test | 46.1% | #56 of 90 | Official leaderboard | |
| World-Class Bio | 38.9% | #49 of 74 | Official leaderboard | |
| Agentic BAIM-LLM Evaluation (ABLE) | 48.1% | #12 of 18 | Official leaderboard | |
| BioTIER Refuse | 16.3% | #63 of 69 | Official leaderboard |
Other
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAIS Text Capabilities Index | 19.9 | #51 of 68 | Official leaderboard | |
| CAIS Risk Index | 63.9 | #55 of 67 | Official leaderboard |
Its lab's numbers put it at 146.8, 1.4 points above its ECI
The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 18 capability results Moonshot AI reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 145.0 to 148.6. How we compute it.
- AIME 2025 94.5
- MMLU-Redux 94.4
- HMMT 2025 89.4
- FRAMES 87
- MMLU-Pro 84.6
- GPQA Diamond 84.5
- LiveCodeBench v6 83.1
- IMO-AnswerBench 78.6
- SWE-bench Verified 71.3
- BrowseComp-ZH 62.3
- SWE-bench Multilingual 61.1
- BrowseComp 60.2
- HealthBench 58
- OJBench 48.7
- Terminal-Bench 47.1
- Humanity's Last Exam 44.9
- SciCode 44.8
- Multi-SWE-bench 41.9
Its lab's numbers next to 4 leaderboards
Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.
| Benchmark | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 71.3% SWE-bench Verified, w/ tools | 63.4% Leaderboard, mini-SWE-agent | +7.9 pts |
| HMMT 2025 | 89.4% HMMT25, no tools | 93.3% Leaderboard | −3.9 pts |
| AIME 2025 | 94.5% AIME25, no tools | 92.5% Leaderboard | +2.0 pts |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.5% GPQA, no tools | 84.2% Epoch AI run | +0.3 pts |
Moonshot AI's models over time
Moonshot AI's models in color, against every other model on the Epoch Capabilities Index, by release date.
Source: Epoch Capabilities Index, Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)
Its launch post
The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.