Benchmark Almanac

Mantis-Eval

LongCat-Flash-Omni 84.8% leads since October 2025
Dropped

Models answer questions that need reasoning across several interleaved images. Scored by accuracy.

Released with the Mantis model paper as its multi-image test set.

Released
May 2024
Kind
General visual questions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
October 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
October 2025

In the authors’ words

Large multimodal models (LMMs) have shown great results in single-image vision language tasks. However, their abilities to solve multi-image visual language tasks is yet to be improved. The existing LMMs like OpenFlamingo, Emu2, and Idefics gain their multi-image ability through pre-training on hundreds of millions of noisy interleaved image-text data from the web, which is neither efficient nor effective. In this paper, we aim to build strong multi-image LMMs via instruction tuning with academic-level resources. Therefore, we meticulously construct Mantis-Instruct containing 721K multi-image instruction data to train a family of Mantis models. The instruction tuning empowers Mantis with different multi-image skills like co-reference, comparison, reasoning, and temporal understanding. We evaluate Mantis on 8 multi-image benchmarks and 6 single-image benchmarks. Mantis-Idefics2 can achieve SoTA results on all the multi-image benchmarks and beat the strongest multi-image baseline, Idefics2-8B by an average of 13 absolute points. Notably, Idefics2-8B was pre-trained on 140M interleaved multi-image data, which is 200x larger than Mantis-Instruct. We observe that Mantis performs equivalently well on the held-in and held-out benchmarks, which shows its generalization ability. We further evaluate Mantis on single-image benchmarks and demonstrate that Mantis also maintains a strong single-image performance on par with CogVLM and Emu2. Our results show that multi-image abilities are not necessarily gained through massive pre-training, instead, they can be gained by low-cost instruction tuning. The training and evaluation of Mantis has paved the road for future work to improve LMMs' multi-image abilities.

Abstract of MANTIS: Interleaved Multi-Image Instruction Tuning (arXiv:2405.01483, CC0)
2
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 2 labs

LongCat-Flash-Omni leads with 84.8%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 LongCat-Flash-Omni 84.8%
  2. 2 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 77%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 LongCat-Flash-Omni 84.8% Oct 2025 Lab model card
2 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 77% Aug 2025 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in May 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Shanghai AI Lab Meituan
Lab claims Not tested since Oct 2025

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) LongCat-Flash-Omni InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) LongCat-Flash-Omni InternVL3.5-241B-A28B

Source: Labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since October 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Meituan
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 84.8 Mantis

2 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 84.8 Mantis (Table 5) Capabilities
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 77 Mantis Eval (Table 5) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%