MCP-Bench
Agents solve multi-step tasks using 28 live MCP servers with 250 tools in areas such as finance, travel, scientific computing and academic search. Scoring covers tool use, coordination and planning.
63 HF paper upvotes and about 510 GitHub stars.
- Made by
- Accenture
- Released
- August 2025
- Kind
- Apps and MCP servers
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last model added
- August 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We introduce MCP-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on realistic, multi-step tasks that demand tool use, cross-tool coordination, precise parameter control, and planning/reasoning for solving tasks. Built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), MCP-Bench connects LLMs to 28 representative live MCP servers spanning 250 tools across domains such as finance, traveling, scientific computing, and academic search. Unlike prior API-based benchmarks, each MCP server provides a set of complementary tools designed to work together, enabling the construction of authentic, multi-step tasks with rich input-output coupling. Tasks in MCP-Bench test agents' ability to retrieve relevant tools from fuzzy instructions without explicit tool names, plan multi-hop execution trajectories for complex objectives, ground responses in intermediate tool outputs, and orchestrate cross-domain workflows - capabilities not adequately evaluated by existing benchmarks that rely on explicit tool specifications, shallow few-step workflows, and isolated domain operations. We propose a multi-faceted evaluation framework covering tool-level schema understanding and usage, trajectory-level planning, and task completion. Experiments on 20 advanced LLMs reveal persistent challenges in MCP-Bench. Code and data: https://github.com/Accenture/mcp-bench.
GPT-5 leads with 0.75 among models released by August 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 0.75 GPT-5
- 0.71 o3
- 0.69 gpt-oss-120b
- 0.69 gemini-2.5-pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 0.68 Claude Sonnet 4
- 0.68 qwen3-235b-a22b-2507
- 0.67 GLM-4.5
- 0.65 gpt-oss-20b
- 0.63 kimi-k2 (snapshot unspecified)
- 0.63
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct
- 0.60 gemini-2.5-flash-lite (snapshot unspecified)
- 0.59 gpt-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 0.58
Gemma 3 27B
- 0.56
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- 0.56 GPT-4o mini
- 0.53
Mistral Small 3.1
- 0.51
Llama 3.1-70B
- 0.51
Amazon Nova Micro
- 0.49
Llama 3.2 90B
- 0.43
Llama 3.1-8B
- 1 GPT-5 0.75
- 2 o3 0.71
- 3 gpt-oss-120b 0.69
- 4 gemini-2.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) 0.69
- 5 Claude Sonnet 4 0.68
- 6 qwen3-235b-a22b-2507 0.68
- 7 GLM-4.5 0.67
- 8 gpt-oss-20b 0.65
- 9 kimi-k2 (snapshot unspecified) 0.63
- 10
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct Jul 2025 0.63
- 11 gemini-2.5-flash-lite (snapshot unspecified) 0.60
- 12 gpt-4o (snapshot unspecified) 0.59
- 13
Gemma 3 27B 0.58
- 14
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 0.56
- 15 GPT-4o mini 0.56
- 16
Mistral Small 3.1 0.53
- 17
Llama 3.1-70B 0.51
- 18
Amazon Nova Micro 0.51
- 19
Llama 3.2 90B 0.49
- 20
Llama 3.1-8B 0.43
Source: Official MCP-Bench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5 | 0.75 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | o3 | 0.71 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | gpt-oss-120b | 0.69 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | gemini-2.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) | 0.69 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 0.68 | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | qwen3-235b-a22b-2507 | 0.68 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | GLM-4.5 | 0.67 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | gpt-oss-20b | 0.65 | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | kimi-k2 (snapshot unspecified) | 0.63 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 0.63 | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | gemini-2.5-flash-lite (snapshot unspecified) | 0.60 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | gpt-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 0.59 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | | 0.58 | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 0.56 | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | GPT-4o mini | 0.56 | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 0.53 | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 0.51 | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 0.51 | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 0.49 | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 0.43 | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in August 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official MCP-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official MCP-Bench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%