Benchmark Almanac

MIRB

GPT-4V (snapshot unspecified) 53% tops its leaderboard LongVA-7B 37.7% leads the models we track
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 73% leads since August 2025
Only in system cards

Models compare, analyze and reason across several images in four categories: perception, visual world knowledge, reasoning and multi-hop reasoning.

Shanghai AI Lab reports the category average in the InternVL3 and InternVL3.5 reports.

Released
June 2024
Kind
General visual questions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Last in a system card
August 2025
Last model added
August 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

The advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly broadened the scope of applications in natural language processing, with multi-modal LLMs extending these capabilities to integrate and interpret visual data. However, existing benchmarks for visual language models (VLMs) predominantly focus on single-image inputs, neglecting the crucial aspect of multi-image understanding. In this paper, we introduce a Multi-Image Relational Benchmark MIRB, designed to evaluate VLMs' ability to compare, analyze, and reason across multiple images. Our benchmark encompasses four categories: perception, visual world knowledge, reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning. Through a comprehensive evaluation of a wide range of open-source and closed-source models, we demonstrate that while open-source VLMs were shown to approach the performance of GPT-4V in single-image tasks, a significant performance gap remains in multi-image reasoning tasks. Our findings also reveal that even the state-of-the-art GPT-4V model struggles with our benchmark, underscoring the need for further research and development in this area. We believe our contribution of MIRB could serve as a testbed for developing the next-generation multi-modal models.

Abstract of Benchmarking Multi-Image Understanding in Vision and Language Models: Perception, Knowledge, Reasoning, and Multi-Hop Reasoning (arXiv:2406.12742, CC0)
15
Entries on its own leaderboard, 7 models we track
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

GPT-4V (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 53%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is LongVA-7B, at 37.7%.

InternVL3.5-241B-A28B leads with 73%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in June 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-4V (snapshot unspecified) 53%
  2. 2 InternLM-XC2d5 42.5%
  3. 3 LongVA-7B 37.7%
  4. 4 VILA-7B 36.5%
  5. 5 Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct 35.2%
  6. 6 Mantis-IDEFICS2 34.8%
  7. 7 VILA-2.7B 33.1%
  8. 8 Idefics2-8B 33%
  9. 9 InternLM-XComposer2 32.5%
  10. 10 LLaVA-Next-7B 29.8%
  11. 11 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b 29.4%
  12. 12 llava-v1.5-7b 28.5%
  13. 13 Emu2-Chat 27.2%
  14. 14 IDEFICS1-9B 26.6%
  15. 15 Qwen-VL-Chat 14.4%

Source: Official MIRB leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4V (snapshot unspecified) 53% Official leaderboard
2 InternLM-XC2d5 42.5% Official leaderboard
3 LongVA-7B 37.7% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
4 VILA-7B 36.5% Official leaderboard
5 Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct 35.2% May 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Mantis-IDEFICS2 34.8% Official leaderboard
7 VILA-2.7B 33.1% Official leaderboard
8 Idefics2-8B 33% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
9 InternLM-XComposer2 32.5% Official leaderboard
10 LLaVA-Next-7B 29.8% Official leaderboard
11 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b 29.4% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
12 llava-v1.5-7b 28.5% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
13 Emu2-Chat 27.2% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
14 IDEFICS1-9B 26.6% Official leaderboard
15 Qwen-VL-Chat 14.4% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 73% Aug 2025 Lab model card
2 LongVA-7B 37.7% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Phi-3-vision-128k-instruct 35.2% May 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Idefics2-8B 33% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
5 llava-v1.6-vicuna-13b 29.4% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
6 llava-v1.5-7b 28.5% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
7 Emu2-Chat 27.2% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen-VL-Chat 14.4% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in June 2024 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Microsoft Other labs
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2024
LongVA-7B 37.7%

Source: Official MIRB leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B LongVA-7B Idefics2-8B llava-v1.5-7b Qwen-VL-Chat 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) InternVL3.5-241B-A28B LongVA-7B

Sources: Official MIRB leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 73 MIRB (avg) (Table 5) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%