Benchmark Almanac

MultiPL-E

Qwen3-Coder-Next 88.2% leads since February 2026
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 63.4% leads since November 2024
Qwen3-Coder-Next 88.2% leads since February 2026
Fading

Models write code for HumanEval and MBPP problems translated into 18 other programming languages. Scored by pass@1 on unit tests.

Released
August 2022
Kind
Function-level problems
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Kimi K2 Jul 2025 #116 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
April 2026, dropped after it saturated
Last model added
April 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large language models have demonstrated the ability to generate both natural language and programming language text. Such models open up the possibility of multi-language code generation: could code generation models generalize knowledge from one language to another? Although contemporary code generation models can generate semantically correct Python code, little is known about their abilities with other languages. We propose MultiPL-E, a system for translating unit test-driven code generation benchmarks to new languages. We create the first massively multilingual code generation benchmark by using MultiPL-E to translate two popular Python code generation benchmarks to 18 additional programming languages. We use MultiPL-E to extend the HumanEval benchmark and MBPP benchmark to 18 languages that encompass a range of programming paradigms and popularity. Using these new parallel benchmarks, we evaluate the multi-language performance of three state-of-the-art code generation models: Codex, CodeGen, and InCoder. We find that Codex matches or even exceeds its performance on Python for several other languages. The range of programming languages represented in MultiPL-E allow us to explore the impact of language frequency and language features on model performance. Finally, the MultiPL-E approach of compiling code generation benchmarks to new programming languages is both scalable and extensible, making it straightforward to evaluate new models, benchmarks, and languages.

Abstract of MultiPL-E: A Scalable and Extensible Approach to Benchmarking Neural Code Generation (arXiv:2208.08227, CC0)
18
Models scored in lab cards
11
Launch posts list it, from 5 labs
19
System cards report it, from 4 labs

Qwen3-Coder-Next leads with 88.2% among models released by April 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct leads with 63.4% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Qwen3-Coder-Next leads with 88.2%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3-Coder-Next 88.2%
  2. 2 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 85.7%
  3. 3 Mistral Medium 3 81.4%
  4. 4 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 81.4%
  5. 5 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 79.5%
  6. 6 Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M 77.1%
  7. 7 Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024 76.9%
  8. 8 Mercury Coder Small 76.2%
  9. 9 Qwen2.5-32B 75.4%
  10. 10 Qwen2.5-72B 75.1%
  11. 11 Qwen-Turbo 73.7%
  12. 12 Qwen2.5-14B 72.8%
  13. 13 Qwen2.5-7B 70.4%
  14. 14 Qwen2-72B 69.2%
  15. 15 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 65.8%
  16. 16 Granite 4.1 30B 62.3%
  17. 17 Granite 4.0 H Small 57.4%
  18. 18 granite-4.0-1b 32.2%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3-Coder-Next 88.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 85.7% Jul 2025 Lab model card
3 Mistral Medium 3 81.4% May 2025 Lab model card
4 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 81.4% Sep 2025 Lab model card
5 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 79.5% Feb 2025 Lab model card
6 Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M 77.1% Jan 2025 Lab model card
7 Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024 76.9% Jul 2024 Lab model card
8 Mercury Coder Small 76.2% Feb 2025 Lab model card
9 Qwen2.5-32B 75.4% Dec 2024 Lab model card
10 Qwen2.5-72B 75.1% Sep 2024 Lab model card
11 Qwen-Turbo 73.7% Dec 2024 Lab model card
12 Qwen2.5-14B 72.8% Dec 2024 Lab model card
13 Qwen2.5-7B 70.4% Dec 2024 Lab model card
14 Qwen2-72B 69.2% Jun 2024 Lab model card
15 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 65.8% Mar 2025 Lab model card
16 Granite 4.1 30B 62.3% Apr 2026 Lab model card
17 Granite 4.0 H Small 57.4% Oct 2025 Lab model card
18 granite-4.0-1b 32.2% Oct 2025 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 63.4% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B 55.1% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Code Llama 70B Instruct 42.6% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
4 CodeQwen1.5-7B 40.5% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Code Llama 34B Instruct 35.1% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard
6 StarCoder 2 15B 34.9% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
7 StarCoder 2 7B 26.1% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Falcon-180B 24.1% Sep 2023 Official leaderboard
9 StarCoder 2 3B 23.4% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3-Coder-Next 88.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 85.7% Jul 2025 Lab model card
3 Mistral Medium 3 81.4% May 2025 Lab model card
4 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 81.4% Sep 2025 Lab model card
5 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 79.5% Feb 2025 Lab model card
6 Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M 77.1% Jan 2025 Lab model card
7 Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024 76.9% Jul 2024 Lab model card
8 Mercury Coder Small 76.2% Feb 2025 Lab model card
9 Qwen2.5-32B 75.4% Dec 2024 Lab model card
10 Qwen2.5-72B 75.1% Sep 2024 Lab model card
11 Qwen-Turbo 73.7% Dec 2024 Lab model card
12 Qwen2.5-14B 72.8% Dec 2024 Lab model card
13 Qwen2.5-7B 70.4% Dec 2024 Lab model card
14 Qwen2-72B 69.2% Jun 2024 Lab model card
15 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 65.8% Mar 2025 Lab model card
16 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 63.4% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Granite 4.1 30B 62.3% Apr 2026 Lab model card
18 Granite 4.0 H Small 57.4% Oct 2025 Lab model card
19 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B 55.1% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
20 Code Llama 70B Instruct 42.6% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
21 CodeQwen1.5-7B 40.5% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
22 Code Llama 34B Instruct 35.1% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard
23 StarCoder 2 15B 34.9% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
24 granite-4.0-1b 32.2% Oct 2025 Lab model card
25 StarCoder 2 7B 26.1% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
26 Falcon-180B 24.1% Sep 2023 Official leaderboard
27 StarCoder 2 3B 23.4% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 60 entries, 9 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

7 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023 4 models have held number one across all independent runs since 2023 9 models have held number one with claims included since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Meta Qwen Mistral AI Moonshot AI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Nov 2024
Lab claims Passed 85% in Jul 2025, by Kimi K2

Sources: Official MultiPL-E leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Moonshot AI’s own number for Kimi K2 passed 85% in July 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3-Coder-Next Kimi K2 Mistral Medium 3 Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M Mistral Large 2 Qwen2-72B Code Llama 70B Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3-Coder-Next Mistral Medium 3

Sources: Official MultiPL-E leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
Mistral AI
Inception Labs
Moonshot AI
IBM
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Apr 29, 2026 Granite 4.1 30B 62.3 MULTIPLE (pass@1)
Oct 28, 2025 granite-4.0-1b 32.2 MULTIPLE (pass@1)
Oct 2, 2025 Granite 4.0 H Small 57.4 MULTIPLE (pass@1)
Sep 22, 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 81.4 MultiPL-E
Jul 11, 2025 Kimi K2 85.7 MultiPL-E, Pass@1
May 7, 2025 Mistral Medium 3 81.4 MultiPL-E average 0-shot
Mar 27, 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 65.8 MultiPL-E
Feb 26, 2025 Mercury Coder Small 76.2 MultiPL-E
Sep 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-72B 75.1 MultiPL-E
Jul 24, 2024 Mistral Large 2 76.9 MultiPL-E Average (Python, C++, Bash, Java, TypeScript, PHP, C#)
Jun 7, 2024 Qwen2-72B 69.2 MultiPL-E

19 system cards report it, from 4 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Feb 28, 2026 Qwen3-Coder-Next technical report 88.2 MultiPL-E (Table 6) Capabilities
Sep 22, 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B technical report 81.4 MultiPL-E, Instruct (Table 4). Thinking 80.6 (Table 5) Capabilities
Jul 21, 2025 Kimi K2 technical report 85.7 MultiPL-E (Pass@1) (Table 3) Capabilities
Jun 17, 2025 Mercury Coder Small technical report 76.2 MultiPL-E Avg over C++ 82.0, Java 80.1, JS 83.9, PHP 78.3, Bash 50.1, TS 82.6 (Tables 1 and 2) Capabilities
Mar 26, 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B technical report 65.8 MultiPL-E (Table 1) Capabilities
Feb 19, 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 79.5 MultiPL-E (Table 4) Capabilities
Jan 26, 2025 Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M technical report 77.1 MultiPL-E (Table 6) Capabilities
Dec 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-7B technical report 70.4 MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (Table 8) Capabilities
Dec 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-72B technical report 75.1 MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct (Table 6) Capabilities
Dec 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-32B technical report 75.4 MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct (Table 7) Capabilities
Dec 19, 2024 Qwen2.5-14B technical report 72.8 MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct (Table 7) Capabilities
Dec 19, 2024 Qwen-Turbo technical report 73.7 MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-Turbo (Table 7) Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-8B technical report MultiPL-E pass@1 by language, no overall, post-trained (Table 19): HumanEval C++ 52.8, Java 58.2, PHP 54.7, TS 56.6, C# 38.0, Shell 39.2. MBPP C++ 53.7, Java 54.4, PHP 55.7, TS 62.8, C# 43.3, Shell 33.0 Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-70B technical report MultiPL-E pass@1 by language, no overall, post-trained (Table 19): HumanEval C++ 71.4, Java 72.2, PHP 67.7, TS 73.0, C# 50.0, Shell 51.9. MBPP C++ 65.2, Java 65.3, PHP 64.0, TS 70.5, C# 51.0, Shell 41.9 Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-405B technical report MultiPL-E pass@1 by language, no overall, post-trained (Table 19): HumanEval C++ 82.0, Java 80.4, PHP 76.4, TS 81.1, C# 54.4, Shell 57.6. MBPP C++ 67.5, Java 65.8, PHP 76.6, TS 72.6, C# 53.1, Shell 43.7 Capabilities
Jul 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-8B model card Multipl-E HumanEval 50.8 and Multipl-E MBPP 52.4, pass@1, no overall, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) Capabilities
Jul 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-70B model card Multipl-E HumanEval 65.5 and Multipl-E MBPP 62.0, pass@1, no overall, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) Capabilities
Jul 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-405B model card Multipl-E HumanEval 75.2 and Multipl-E MBPP 65.7, pass@1, no overall, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) Capabilities
Jul 15, 2024 Qwen2-72B technical report 69.2 MultiPL-E, Qwen2-72B-Instruct (Table 6) Capabilities

3 logged changes that move scores

Changes by the maintainers, so a score from before a change may not compare with one from after it. Newest first, each with the maintainers' own source. The list may be incomplete. What we log.

  1. Harness changed July 15th, 2025

    The maintainers removed a spurious Lua stop token. New Lua evaluations avoid premature truncation and can score higher than earlier runs. Source

  2. Tasks changed July 6th, 2024

    The maintainers added four programming languages and corrected four Scala problems in version 3.0. The release also changed prompt whitespace across several existing languages. Source

  3. Tasks changed October 3rd, 2022

    The maintainers added translated MBPP tasks alongside HumanEval tasks. Scores must identify which source task set they use. Source

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471