MultiPL-E
Models write code for HumanEval and MBPP problems translated into 18 other programming languages. Scored by pass@1 on unit tests.
- Released
- August 2022
- Kind
- Function-level problems
- Level
- School
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Code
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Kimi K2 Jul 2025 #116 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- April 2026, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- April 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large language models have demonstrated the ability to generate both natural language and programming language text. Such models open up the possibility of multi-language code generation: could code generation models generalize knowledge from one language to another? Although contemporary code generation models can generate semantically correct Python code, little is known about their abilities with other languages. We propose MultiPL-E, a system for translating unit test-driven code generation benchmarks to new languages. We create the first massively multilingual code generation benchmark by using MultiPL-E to translate two popular Python code generation benchmarks to 18 additional programming languages. We use MultiPL-E to extend the HumanEval benchmark and MBPP benchmark to 18 languages that encompass a range of programming paradigms and popularity. Using these new parallel benchmarks, we evaluate the multi-language performance of three state-of-the-art code generation models: Codex, CodeGen, and InCoder. We find that Codex matches or even exceeds its performance on Python for several other languages. The range of programming languages represented in MultiPL-E allow us to explore the impact of language frequency and language features on model performance. Finally, the MultiPL-E approach of compiling code generation benchmarks to new programming languages is both scalable and extensible, making it straightforward to evaluate new models, benchmarks, and languages.
Qwen3-Coder-Next leads with 88.2% among models released by April 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct leads with 63.4% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Qwen3-Coder-Next leads with 88.2%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 88.2
Qwen3-Coder-Next
- 85.7 Kimi K2
- 81.4
Mistral Medium 3
- 81.4
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 79.5
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 77.1
Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M
- 76.9
Mistral Large 2
- 76.2 Mercury Coder Small
- 75.4
Qwen2.5-32B
- 75.1
Qwen2.5-72B
- 73.7
Qwen-Turbo
- 72.8
Qwen2.5-14B
- 70.4
Qwen2.5-7B
- 69.2
Qwen2-72B
- 65.8
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 62.3 Granite 4.1 30B
- 57.4 Granite 4.0 H Small
- 32.2 granite-4.0-1b
- 1
Qwen3-Coder-Next 88.2%
- 2 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 85.7%
- 3
Mistral Medium 3 81.4%
- 4
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 81.4%
- 5
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 79.5%
- 6
Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M 77.1%
- 7
Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024 76.9%
- 8 Mercury Coder Small 76.2%
- 9
Qwen2.5-32B 75.4%
- 10
Qwen2.5-72B 75.1%
- 11
Qwen-Turbo 73.7%
- 12
Qwen2.5-14B 72.8%
- 13
Qwen2.5-7B 70.4%
- 14
Qwen2-72B 69.2%
- 15
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 65.8%
- 16 Granite 4.1 30B 62.3%
- 17 Granite 4.0 H Small 57.4%
- 18 granite-4.0-1b 32.2%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 63.4%
- 2
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B 55.1%
- 3
Code Llama 70B Instruct 42.6%
- 4 CodeQwen1.5-7B 40.5%
- 5
Code Llama 34B Instruct 35.1%
- 6
StarCoder 2 15B 34.9%
- 7
StarCoder 2 7B 26.1%
- 8
Falcon-180B 24.1%
- 9
StarCoder 2 3B 23.4%
Source: Official MultiPL-E leaderboard
- 88.2
Qwen3-Coder-Next
- 85.7 Kimi K2
- 81.4
Mistral Medium 3
- 81.4
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 79.5
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 77.1
Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M
- 76.9
Mistral Large 2
- 76.2 Mercury Coder Small
- 75.4
Qwen2.5-32B
- 75.1
Qwen2.5-72B
- 73.7
Qwen-Turbo
- 72.8
Qwen2.5-14B
- 70.4
Qwen2.5-7B
- 69.2
Qwen2-72B
- 65.8
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 63.4
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct
- 62.3 Granite 4.1 30B
- 57.4 Granite 4.0 H Small
- 55.1
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
- 42.6
Code Llama 70B Instruct
- 40.5 CodeQwen1.5-7B
- 35.1
Code Llama 34B Instruct
- 34.9
StarCoder 2 15B
- 32.2 granite-4.0-1b
- 26.1
StarCoder 2 7B
- 24.1
Falcon-180B
- 23.4
StarCoder 2 3B
- 1
Qwen3-Coder-Next 88.2%
- 2 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 85.7%
- 3
Mistral Medium 3 81.4%
- 4
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 81.4%
- 5
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 79.5%
- 6
Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M 77.1%
- 7
Mistral Large 2 Jul 2024 76.9%
- 8 Mercury Coder Small 76.2%
- 9
Qwen2.5-32B 75.4%
- 10
Qwen2.5-72B 75.1%
- 11
Qwen-Turbo 73.7%
- 12
Qwen2.5-14B 72.8%
- 13
Qwen2.5-7B 70.4%
- 14
Qwen2-72B 69.2%
- 15
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 65.8%
- 16
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 63.4%
- 17 Granite 4.1 30B 62.3%
- 18 Granite 4.0 H Small 57.4%
- 19
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B 55.1%
- 20
Code Llama 70B Instruct 42.6%
- 21 CodeQwen1.5-7B 40.5%
- 22
Code Llama 34B Instruct 35.1%
- 23
StarCoder 2 15B 34.9%
- 24 granite-4.0-1b 32.2%
- 25
StarCoder 2 7B 26.1%
- 26
Falcon-180B 24.1%
- 27
StarCoder 2 3B 23.4%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official MultiPL-E leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 88.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 85.7% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 81.4% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 81.4% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 79.5% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 77.1% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 76.9% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | Mercury Coder Small | 76.2% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 75.4% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 75.1% | Sep 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 73.7% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 72.8% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 70.4% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 69.2% | Jun 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 65.8% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | Granite 4.1 30B | 62.3% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | Granite 4.0 H Small | 57.4% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | granite-4.0-1b | 32.2% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 63.4% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 55.1% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 42.6% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | CodeQwen1.5-7B | 40.5% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 35.1% | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 34.9% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 26.1% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 24.1% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 23.4% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 88.2% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Kimi K2 Jul 2025 | 85.7% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 81.4% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 81.4% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 79.5% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 77.1% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 76.9% | Jul 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | Mercury Coder Small | 76.2% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 75.4% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 75.1% | Sep 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 73.7% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 72.8% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 70.4% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 69.2% | Jun 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 65.8% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 63.4% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Granite 4.1 30B | 62.3% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | Granite 4.0 H Small | 57.4% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 55.1% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 42.6% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | CodeQwen1.5-7B | 40.5% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 35.1% | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 34.9% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | granite-4.0-1b | 32.2% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | | 26.1% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 24.1% | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 23.4% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 60 entries, 9 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
7 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023 4 models have held number one across all independent runs since 2023 9 models have held number one with claims included since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official MultiPL-E leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Moonshot AI’s own number for Kimi K2 passed 85% in July 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official MultiPL-E leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2026 | Granite 4.1 30B | 62.3 | MULTIPLE (pass@1) |
| Oct 28, 2025 | granite-4.0-1b | 32.2 | MULTIPLE (pass@1) |
| Oct 2, 2025 | Granite 4.0 H Small | 57.4 | MULTIPLE (pass@1) |
| Sep 22, 2025 | 81.4 | MultiPL-E | |
| Jul 11, 2025 | Kimi K2 | 85.7 | MultiPL-E, Pass@1 |
| May 7, 2025 | 81.4 | MultiPL-E average 0-shot | |
| Mar 27, 2025 | 65.8 | MultiPL-E | |
| Feb 26, 2025 | Mercury Coder Small | 76.2 | MultiPL-E |
| Sep 19, 2024 | 75.1 | MultiPL-E | |
| Jul 24, 2024 | 76.9 | MultiPL-E Average (Python, C++, Bash, Java, TypeScript, PHP, C#) | |
| Jun 7, 2024 | 69.2 | MultiPL-E |
19 system cards report it, from 4 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2026 | | 88.2 | MultiPL-E (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2025 | | 81.4 | MultiPL-E, Instruct (Table 4). Thinking 80.6 (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Jul 21, 2025 | Kimi K2 technical report | 85.7 | MultiPL-E (Pass@1) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Jun 17, 2025 | Mercury Coder Small technical report | 76.2 | MultiPL-E Avg over C++ 82.0, Java 80.1, JS 83.9, PHP 78.3, Bash 50.1, TS 82.6 (Tables 1 and 2) | Capabilities |
| Mar 26, 2025 | | 65.8 | MultiPL-E (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | 79.5 | MultiPL-E (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Jan 26, 2025 | | 77.1 | MultiPL-E (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Dec 19, 2024 | | 70.4 | MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (Table 8) | Capabilities |
| Dec 19, 2024 | | 75.1 | MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Dec 19, 2024 | | 75.4 | MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Dec 19, 2024 | | 72.8 | MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Dec 19, 2024 | | 73.7 | MultiPL-E, Qwen2.5-Turbo (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Nov 23, 2024 | | MultiPL-E pass@1 by language, no overall, post-trained (Table 19): HumanEval C++ 52.8, Java 58.2, PHP 54.7, TS 56.6, C# 38.0, Shell 39.2. MBPP C++ 53.7, Java 54.4, PHP 55.7, TS 62.8, C# 43.3, Shell 33.0 | Capabilities | |
| Nov 23, 2024 | | MultiPL-E pass@1 by language, no overall, post-trained (Table 19): HumanEval C++ 71.4, Java 72.2, PHP 67.7, TS 73.0, C# 50.0, Shell 51.9. MBPP C++ 65.2, Java 65.3, PHP 64.0, TS 70.5, C# 51.0, Shell 41.9 | Capabilities | |
| Nov 23, 2024 | | MultiPL-E pass@1 by language, no overall, post-trained (Table 19): HumanEval C++ 82.0, Java 80.4, PHP 76.4, TS 81.1, C# 54.4, Shell 57.6. MBPP C++ 67.5, Java 65.8, PHP 76.6, TS 72.6, C# 53.1, Shell 43.7 | Capabilities | |
| Jul 23, 2024 | | Multipl-E HumanEval 50.8 and Multipl-E MBPP 52.4, pass@1, no overall, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) | Capabilities | |
| Jul 23, 2024 | | Multipl-E HumanEval 65.5 and Multipl-E MBPP 62.0, pass@1, no overall, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) | Capabilities | |
| Jul 23, 2024 | | Multipl-E HumanEval 75.2 and Multipl-E MBPP 65.7, pass@1, no overall, instruction tuned (Instruction tuned models table) | Capabilities | |
| Jul 15, 2024 | | 69.2 | MultiPL-E, Qwen2-72B-Instruct (Table 6) | Capabilities |
3 logged changes that move scores
Changes by the maintainers, so a score from before a change may not compare with one from after it. Newest first, each with the maintainers' own source. The list may be incomplete. What we log.
- Harness changed July 15th, 2025
The maintainers removed a spurious Lua stop token. New Lua evaluations avoid premature truncation and can score higher than earlier runs. Source
- Tasks changed July 6th, 2024
The maintainers added four programming languages and corrected four Scala problems in version 3.0. The release also changed prompt whitespace across several existing languages. Source
- Tasks changed October 3rd, 2022
The maintainers added translated MBPP tasks alongside HumanEval tasks. Scores must identify which source task set they use. Source
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471