Benchmark Almanac

Nuscene

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 16.0 leads since February 2026
Fading

Models localize named objects as 3D boxes in nuScenes driving camera images. Scored by mAP.

The catalog description infers a camera grounding setup from a model report. The official nuScenes detection board ranks NDS and has a separate nuscenes-detection proposal.

Released
March 2019
Kind
Detection and captioning
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B #77 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
March 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
March 2026

In the authors’ words

Robust detection and tracking of objects is crucial for the deployment of autonomous vehicle technology. Image based benchmark datasets have driven development in computer vision tasks such as object detection, tracking and segmentation of agents in the environment. Most autonomous vehicles, however, carry a combination of cameras and range sensors such as lidar and radar. As machine learning based methods for detection and tracking become more prevalent, there is a need to train and evaluate such methods on datasets containing range sensor data along with images. In this work we present nuTonomy scenes (nuScenes), the first dataset to carry the full autonomous vehicle sensor suite: 6 cameras, 5 radars and 1 lidar, all with full 360 degree field of view. nuScenes comprises 1000 scenes, each 20s long and fully annotated with 3D bounding boxes for 23 classes and 8 attributes. It has 7x as many annotations and 100x as many images as the pioneering KITTI dataset. We define novel 3D detection and tracking metrics. We also provide careful dataset analysis as well as baselines for lidar and image based detection and tracking. Data, development kit and more information are available online.

Abstract of nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving (arXiv:1903.11027, CC0)
8
Models scored in lab cards
8
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads with 16.0 among models released by February 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 16.0
  2. 2 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 15.4
  3. 3 Qwen3.5-27B 15.2
  4. 4 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 14.6
  5. 5 Qwen3.5-9B 11.8
  6. 6 Qwen3.5-4B 9.90
  7. 7 Qwen3.5-2B 6.90
  8. 8 Qwen3.5-0.8B 5.70

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 16.0 Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 15.4 Feb 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5-27B 15.2 Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 14.6 Feb 2026 Lab model card
5 Qwen3.5-9B 11.8 Mar 2026 Lab model card
6 Qwen3.5-4B 9.90 Mar 2026 Lab model card
7 Qwen3.5-2B 6.90 Mar 2026 Lab model card
8 Qwen3.5-0.8B 5.70 Mar 2026 Lab model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2026

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
5.00 7.50 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 2026 5.00 7.50 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 2026

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in March 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-0.8B 5.7 Nuscene 5.7/7.0 (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-2B 6.9 Nuscene 6.9/8.5 (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-4B 9.9 Nuscene
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-9B 11.8 Nuscene
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 14.6 Nuscene
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-27B 15.2 Nuscene
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 15.4 Nuscene
Feb 16, 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 16 Nuscene

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%