OfficeQA
Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers.
Pro = 133 hard questions. Pro V2 (90 questions, new corpus) followed. Answers gated on HF to limit crawling.
- Made by
- Databricks
- Released
- March 2026
- Kind
- Documents and spreadsheets
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Fable 5.2 #1 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- July 2026
- Last model added
- November 2026
In the authors’ words
We introduce OfficeQA Pro, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on grounded, multi-document reasoning over a large and heterogeneous document corpus. The corpus consists of U.S. Treasury Bulletins spanning nearly 100 years, comprising 89,000 pages and over 26 million numerical values. OfficeQA Pro consists of 133 questions that require precise document parsing, retrieval, and analytical reasoning across both unstructured text and tabular data. Frontier LLMs including Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview achieve less than 5% accuracy on OfficeQA Pro when relying on parametric knowledge, and less than 12% with additional access to the web. When provided directly with the document corpus, frontier agents still struggle on over half of questions, scoring 34.1% on average. We find that providing agents with a structured document representation produced by Databricks' ai_parse_document yields a 16.1% average relative performance gain across agents. We conduct additional ablations to study the effects of model selection, table representation, retrieval strategy, and test-time scaling on performance. Despite these improvements, significant headroom remains before agents can be considered reliable at enterprise-grade grounded reasoning.
Claude Opus 4.7 leads with 86.3%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1 Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%
- 2 Claude Fable 5.2 83.4%
- 3 Claude Fable 5.1 80.2%
- 4 Claude Opus 5.5 78.9%
- 5 Claude Opus 5 78.1%
- 6 Claude Opus 4.8 77.6%
- 7 Claude Sonnet 5.5 76.9%
- 8 Claude Haiku 5.5 73.5%
- 9 Claude Sonnet 5 73.3%
- 10 GPT-5.4 68.1%
- 11 Kimi K3 63.3%
- 12 Grok 4.6 63.2%
- 13 Claude Fable 5 57.9%
- 14
MiniMax-M3 45.1%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 86.3% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5.2 | 83.4% | Nov 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 80.2% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 78.9% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | Claude Opus 5 | 78.1% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 77.6% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 76.9% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 73.5% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 73.3% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | GPT-5.4 | 68.1% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | Kimi K3 | 63.3% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | Grok 4.6 | 63.2% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | Claude Fable 5 | 57.9% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 45.1% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card |
2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in March 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Anthropic’s own number for Claude Opus 4.7 passed 85% in April 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
3 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | Kimi K3 | 63.3 | OfficeQA Pro |
| Jun 9, 2026 | Claude Fable 5 | 57.9 | OfficeQA Pro |
| Jun 1, 2026 | 45.1 | OfficeQA Pro | |
| Apr 16, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 80.6 | OfficeQA Pro |
| Apr 16, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 86.3 | OfficeQA |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GPT-5.4 | 68.1 | OfficeQA (GPT-5.4) |
11 system cards report it, from 3 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2026 | Claude Fable 5.2 system card | 83.4 | OfficeQA, relevant documents preselected and provided as extracted text, max effort, mean of five runs (Section 8.14.1) | Capabilities |
| Oct 7, 2026 | Claude Haiku 5.5 system card | 73.5 | OfficeQA, max effort, mean of five runs (8.10.1) | Capabilities |
| Sep 28, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 system card | 76.9 | OfficeQA at max effort, documents preselected as extracted text (8.14.1) | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2026 | Claude Opus 5.5 system card | 78.9 | OfficeQA, max effort, mean of five runs, extracted text with code tools (8.14.1) | Capabilities |
| Sep 1, 2026 | Claude Fable 5.1 system card | 80.2 | OfficeQA, extracted text with code tools, public API with production safeguards (8.15.1) | Capabilities |
| Aug 12, 2026 | Grok 4.6 model card | 63.2 | OfficeQA Pro, accuracy, high, Databricks harness (3.4) | Capabilities |
| Jul 27, 2026 | Kimi K3 technical report | 63.3 | OfficeQA Pro, PDF corpus rendered as images (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 24, 2026 | Claude Opus 5 system card | 78.1 | OfficeQA, extracted text with code tools, public API with production safeguards (8.13.1) | Capabilities |
| Jun 30, 2026 | Claude Sonnet 5 system card | 73.3 | OfficeQA exact match, max effort, mean of five trials, extracted text with code tools (8.11.1, Figure 8.11.1.A) | Capabilities |
| May 28, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.8 system card | 77.6 | OfficeQA, internal agentic harness with extracted text and code tools, exact match (8.13.1) | Capabilities |
| Apr 16, 2026 | Claude Opus 4.7 system card | 86.3 | OfficeQA, exact-match grading (Table 8.1.A, 8.10.1) | Capabilities |
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Claude Fable 5 75.9%
- SpreadsheetBench In use Real spreadsheet manipulation questions from Excel forums. Output workbook is checked cell-by-cell against reference solutions.
MiniMax-M3 89.3%