GDPval
Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Only the 220-task gold set is public, with an automated grading service. OpenAI says its hosted GDPval leaderboard is no longer active and points to the GDPval-AA board instead.
- Made by
- OpenAI
- Released
- September 2025
- Kind
- Tasks from real jobs
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Graded by people
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5.5 Pro #14 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- September 2026
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We introduce GDPval, a benchmark evaluating AI model capabilities on real-world economically valuable tasks. GDPval covers the majority of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Work Activities for 44 occupations across the top 9 sectors contributing to U.S. GDP (Gross Domestic Product). Tasks are constructed from the representative work of industry professionals with an average of 14 years of experience. We find that frontier model performance on GDPval is improving roughly linearly over time, and that the current best frontier models are approaching industry experts in deliverable quality. We analyze the potential for frontier models, when paired with human oversight, to perform GDPval tasks cheaper and faster than unaided experts. We also demonstrate that increased reasoning effort, increased task context, and increased scaffolding improves model performance on GDPval. Finally, we open-source a gold subset of 220 tasks and provide a public automated grading service at evals.openai.com to facilitate future research in understanding real-world model capabilities.
Seed2.1 Pro leads with 87.9% among models released by June 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 47.5% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Seed2.1 Pro leads with 87.9%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in June 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 13 more
- 1
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- 2 GPT-5.5 84.9%
- 3 GPT-5.4 83%
- 4 GPT-5.5 Pro 82.3%
- 5 GPT-5.4 Pro 82%
- 6 GPT-5.2 Pro 74.1%
- 7 GPT-5.2 70.9%
- 8 GPT-5.3 Codex 70.9%
- 9
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 53.1%
- 10
Nemotron 3 Ultra 46.7%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 Claude Opus 4.1 47.5%
- 2 GPT-5 high 38.8%
- 3 o3 high 34.1%
- 4 o4-mini high 27.9%
- 5 Grok 4 24.3%
Source: Official GDPval leaderboard
- 1
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- 2 GPT-5.5 84.9%
- 3 GPT-5.4 83%
- 4 GPT-5.5 Pro 82.3%
- 5 GPT-5.4 Pro 82%
- 6 GPT-5.2 Pro 74.1%
- 7 GPT-5.2 70.9%
- 8 GPT-5.3 Codex 70.9%
- 9
Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 53.1%
- 10 Claude Opus 4.1 47.5%
- 11
Nemotron 3 Ultra 46.7%
- 12 GPT-5 high 38.8%
- 13 o3 high 34.1%
- 14 o4-mini high 27.9%
- 15 Grok 4 24.3%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official GDPval leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 87.9% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | GPT-5.5 | 84.9% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | GPT-5.4 | 83% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | GPT-5.5 Pro | 82.3% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | GPT-5.4 Pro | 82% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | GPT-5.2 Pro | 74.1% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | GPT-5.2 | 70.9% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | GPT-5.3 Codex | 70.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 53.1% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 46.7% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.1 | 47.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-5 | 38.8% | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | o3 | 34.1% | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | o4-mini | 27.9% | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Grok 4 | 24.3% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 87.9% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | GPT-5.5 | 84.9% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | GPT-5.4 | 83% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | GPT-5.5 Pro | 82.3% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | GPT-5.4 Pro | 82% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | GPT-5.2 Pro | 74.1% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | GPT-5.2 | 70.9% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | GPT-5.3 Codex | 70.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 53.1% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.1 | 47.5% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 46.7% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | GPT-5 | 38.8% | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | o3 | 34.1% | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | o4-mini | 27.9% | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Grok 4 | 24.3% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 7 entries, 5 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in September 2025 Number one over time 5 models have held number one with claims included since its release in September 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official GDPval leaderboard and labs’ model cards
ByteDance Seed’s own number for Seed2.1 Pro passed 85% in June 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official GDPval leaderboard and labs’ model cards
3 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2026 | Grok 4.7 | GDPval (Professional knowledge work) Elo chart [Grok 4.7 xhigh] | |
| Jun 23, 2026 | 87.9 | GDPval (model card Table 1) | |
| Jun 4, 2026 | 46.7 | GDPVal (metric not stated) | |
| Apr 28, 2026 | 53.1 | GDPval | |
| Apr 23, 2026 | GPT-5.5 Pro | 82.3 | GDPval (wins or ties) |
| Apr 23, 2026 | GPT-5.5 | 84.9 | GDPval (wins or ties) |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GPT-5.4 Pro | 82 | GDPval |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GPT-5.4 | 83 | GDPval (wins or ties) |
| Feb 5, 2026 | GPT-5.3 Codex | 70.9 | GDPval (wins or ties) |
| Dec 11, 2025 | GPT-5.2 Pro | 74.1 | GDPval (ties allowed, wins or ties) |
| Dec 11, 2025 | GPT-5.2 | 70.9 | GDPval (wins or ties) Knowledge work tasks |
2 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2026 | | 87.9 | GDPval (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| Jun 9, 2026 | | 46.7 | GDPVal, NVIDIA open implementation, metric not stated (Table 10) | Capabilities |
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Claude Fable 5 75.9%
- OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%
- SpreadsheetBench In use Real spreadsheet manipulation questions from Excel forums. Output workbook is checked cell-by-cell against reference solutions.
MiniMax-M3 89.3%