Benchmark Almanac

CoWorkBench

Claude Fable 5 75.9% leads since June 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 76.1% leads since September 2026
In use

Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished).

Lab-created in-house eval (Alibaba Qwen). Only Qwen reports scores. Tasks and graders are not public.

Made by
Alibaba Qwen
Kind
Tasks from real jobs
Level
Expert
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
Claude Fable 5 #11 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2026
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026
5
Models scored on its own leaderboard
7
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Claude Fable 5 leads with 75.9% among models released by August 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads with 76.1%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Fable 5 75.9%
  2. 2 Qwen 3.8 Max 74.8%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.8 72.3%
  4. 4 GPT-5.6 Sol max 71.5%
  5. 5 Qwen3.7-Max 64.6%

Source: Official CoWorkBench leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Fable 5 75.9% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen 3.8 Max 74.8% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.8 72.3% May 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.6 Sol 71.5% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3.7-Max 64.6% May 2026 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 76.1% Sep 2026 Lab model card
2 Claude Fable 5 75.9% Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.3% Sep 2026 Lab model card
4 Qwen 3.8 Max 74.8% Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3.8 Flash 73.9% Aug 2026 Lab model card
6 Claude Opus 4.8 72.3% May 2026 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-5.6 Sol 71.5% max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen 3.8 27B 70.7% Aug 2026 Lab model card
9 Qwen3.7-Max 67.2% May 2026 Lab model card
10 Qwen3.7-Plus 65.1% Jun 2026 Lab model card

Labs report scores for 7 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since 2023 4 models have held number one with claims included since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Qwen Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2026
Lab claims Not tested since Sep 2026

Sources: Official CoWorkBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Claude Fable 5 Qwen3.7-Max 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Qwen3.7-Max

Sources: Official CoWorkBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 18, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 75.3 CoWorkBench Long-horizon office work
Sep 2, 2026 Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 76.1 Long-horizon office work, CoWorkBench
Aug 26, 2026 Qwen3.8 Flash 73.9 Long-horizon office work CoWorkBench
Aug 14, 2026 Qwen 3.8 27B 70.7 Long-horizon office work CoWorkBench
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 74.8 CoWorkBench
Jun 1, 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 65.1 CoWorkBench
May 20, 2026 Qwen3.7-Max 67.2 CoWorkBench

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 22, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 75.3 CoWorkBench, in-house long-horizon office tasks (Table 2) Capabilities

2 lab claims next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Qwen3.7-Max 67.2% CoWorkBench 64.6% Leaderboard +2.6 pts
Qwen 3.8 Max 74.8% CoWorkBench 74.8% Leaderboard Same

More in Economic work

All 97 in Economic work
  • JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
  • GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate. Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
  • GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
  • AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
  • OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%
  • SpreadsheetBench In use Real spreadsheet manipulation questions from Excel forums. Output workbook is checked cell-by-cell against reference solutions. MiniMax-M3 89.3%