OmniGAIA
Agents answer multi-hop questions that need reasoning and multi-turn tool use across video, audio and image inputs. Questions come from an omni-modal event graph built on real data.
Qwen reports it as omni-modal web search with no harness.
- Made by
- Renmin University of China (RUC-NLPIR) and others
- Released
- February 2026
- Kind
- Deep research
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- September 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Human intelligence naturally intertwines omni-modal perception – spanning vision, audio, and language – with complex reasoning and tool usage to interact with the world. However, current multi-modal LLMs are primarily confined to bi-modal interactions (e.g., vision-language), lacking the unified cognitive capabilities required for general AI assistants. To bridge this gap, we introduce OmniGAIA, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate omni-modal agents on tasks necessitating deep reasoning and multi-turn tool execution across video, audio, and image modalities. Constructed via a novel omni-modal event graph approach, OmniGAIA synthesizes complex, multi-hop queries derived from real-world data that require cross-modal reasoning and external tool integration. Furthermore, we propose OmniAtlas, a native omni-modal foundation agent under tool-integrated reasoning paradigm with active omni-modal perception. Trained on trajectories synthesized via a hindsight-guided tree exploration strategy and OmniDPO for fine-grained error correction, OmniAtlas effectively enhances the tool-use capabilities of existing open-source models. This work marks a step towards next-generation native omni-modal AI assistants for real-world scenarios.
Orchestra-o1-GPT-5 tops the leaderboard with 72.8%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Gemini 3 Pro, at 62.5%.
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads with 74%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in March 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 72.8 Orchestra-o1-GPT-5
- 62.5
Gemini 3 Pro
- 57.2
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 51.7
Gemini 3 Flash
- 33.9
Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash
- 30.8 Gemini-2.5-Pro [snapshot unspecified]
- 20.8 OmniAtlas-Qwen-3 30B
- 13.3 OmniAtlas-Qwen-2.5 7B
- 13.3 Qwen-3-Omni 30B
- 11.1 LongCat-Flash-Omni 560B
- 10.3 OmniAtlas-Qwen-2.5 3B
- 8.60 Gemini-2.5-Flash-Lite [snapshot unspecified]
- 8.30 Ming-Flash-Omni 100B
- 3.90 Ming-Lite-Omni-1.5 20B
- 3.60
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 3.10 MiniCPM-O-2.6 8B
- 2.80 Baichuan-Omni-1.5 8B
- 1.40 Qwen-2.5-Omni 3B
- 1 Orchestra-o1-GPT-5 72.8%
- 2
Gemini 3 Pro 62.5%
- 3
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 57.2%
- 4
Gemini 3 Flash 51.7%
- 5
Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 33.9%
- 6 Gemini-2.5-Pro [snapshot unspecified] 30.8%
- 7 OmniAtlas-Qwen-3 30B 20.8%
- 8 OmniAtlas-Qwen-2.5 7B 13.3%
- 9 Qwen-3-Omni 30B 13.3%
- 10 LongCat-Flash-Omni 560B 11.1%
- 11 OmniAtlas-Qwen-2.5 3B 10.3%
- 12 Gemini-2.5-Flash-Lite [snapshot unspecified] 8.60%
- 13 Ming-Flash-Omni 100B 8.30%
- 14 Ming-Lite-Omni-1.5 20B 3.90%
- 15
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 3.60%
- 16 MiniCPM-O-2.6 8B 3.10%
- 17 Baichuan-Omni-1.5 8B 2.80%
- 18 Qwen-2.5-Omni 3B 1.40%
Source: Official OmniGAIA leaderboard
- 1
Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 74%
- 2
Gemini 3 Pro 62.5%
- 3
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 57.2%
- 4
Gemini 3 Flash 51.7%
- 5 MiMo-V2-Omni 49.8%
- 6
Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash 33.9%
- 7
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 3.60%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official OmniGAIA leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orchestra-o1-GPT-5 | 72.8% | Orchestra-o1-GPT-5 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 62.5% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 57.2% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 51.7% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 33.9% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Gemini-2.5-Pro [snapshot unspecified] | 30.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | OmniAtlas-Qwen-3 30B | 20.8% | OmniAtlas-Qwen-3 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | OmniAtlas-Qwen-2.5 7B | 13.3% | OmniAtlas-Qwen-2.5 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Qwen-3-Omni 30B | 13.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | LongCat-Flash-Omni 560B | 11.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | OmniAtlas-Qwen-2.5 3B | 10.3% | OmniAtlas-Qwen-2.5 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Gemini-2.5-Flash-Lite [snapshot unspecified] | 8.60% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | Ming-Flash-Omni 100B | 8.30% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | Ming-Lite-Omni-1.5 20B | 3.90% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | | 3.60% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | MiniCPM-O-2.6 8B | 3.10% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | Baichuan-Omni-1.5 8B | 2.80% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | Qwen-2.5-Omni 3B | 1.40% | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 74% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 62.5% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 57.2% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 51.7% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | MiMo-V2-Omni | 49.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 33.9% | Mar 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 3.60% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 4 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in February 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official OmniGAIA leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official OmniGAIA leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in September 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | 74 | OmniGAIA Web Search | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 33.9 | OmniGAIA without thinking prompt, Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 57.2 | OmniGAIA (judged by deepseek-v3.2-thinking) | |
| Mar 18, 2026 | MiMo-V2-Omni | 49.8 | OmniGAIA |
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | | 74 | OmniGAIA, no external agent harness (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Apr 17, 2026 | | 57.2 | OmniGAIA, DeepSeek-V3.2-Thinking judge (Table 7) | Capabilities |
2 lab claims next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 2 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 57.2% OmniGAIA (judged by deepseek-v3.2-thinking) | 57.2% Leaderboard | Same |
| | 33.9% OmniGAIA without thinking prompt, Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash | 33.9% Leaderboard | Same |
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%