Benchmark Almanac

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash ranks first on 6 of the 29 benchmarks with five or more models scored.

Qwen Released September 18th, 2026 Family Qwen3.8 The lab's model card Compare with others
49
Benchmarks with a score
6
Ranked first, out of five or more models
15
In the top three
Qwen Sep 2026

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash

Closed weights Mid-size

154.6 #62 of 404
Self-Reported Index, from the lab's own numbers. No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet.
  • IFBench 81.5% #5 /80
  • NL2Repo-Bench 48.9% #14 /30
  • ERQA 71% #7 /36

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
IFBench 81.5% #5 of 80 Lab model card
Humanity's Last Exam 36.5% #70 of 154 Lab model card

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
GPQA Diamond 91% #26 of 302 Lab model card

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
LiveCodeBench v6 92.6% #2 of 90 Lab model card
SWE-bench Multilingual 80.5% #15 of 73 Lab model card
SWE-Bench Pro 63.3% #20 of 81 Lab model card
NL2Repo-Bench 48.9% #14 of 30 Lab model card
DeepSWE 57.8% #44 of 56 Lab model card
Vision2Web 62.9% #6 of 7 Lab model card

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
AndroidWorld 87.1% #1 of 23 Lab model card
WildClawBench 71% #1 of 5 Lab model card
OmniGAIA 74% #1 of 4 Lab model card
DuelLab GameBench 2 69.7 #21 of 57 Official leaderboard
UniClawBench 69.6% #1 of 1 Lab model card

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
CoWorkBench 75.3% #2 of 7 Lab model card
YC-Bench $1,380,061 #22 of 59 Official leaderboard

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
CharXiv 91.4% #4 of 75 Lab model card
MATH-Vision (MathVision) 96.2% #3 of 51 Lab model card
Daily-Omni 85.1% #1 of 14 Official leaderboard
RealWorldQA 87.7% #3 of 38 Lab model card
VoxMem 38.5% #1 of 9 Official leaderboard
MMAU 81.8% #2 of 15 Lab model card
VoiceBench 91.6% #2 of 12 Lab model card
Audio MC 71.5% #1 of 6 Lab model card
WorldSense (omnimodal) 68.5% #1 of 6 Lab model card
ERQA 71% #7 of 36 Lab model card
LVBench 76.9% #7 of 31 Lab model card
MuChoMusic 72.6% #1 of 4 Lab model card
QIVD 69.6% #1 of 4 Lab model card
VideoMME v2 (with subtitles) 65% #2 of 6 Lab model card
AV-SpeakerBench 77.2% #1 of 3 Lab model card
AVUT 86.6% #1 of 3 Lab model card
Claw-Eval-MM 61.9% #3 of 6 Lab model card
MMSU 82.1% #3 of 6 Lab model card
MMAR 79.8% #2 of 4 Lab model card
JointAVBench 75.9% #1 of 2 Lab model card
OmniVideoBench 63.4% #1 of 2 Lab model card
Omni-Cloze 63.2% #2 of 3 Lab model card
StreamingBench 80.8% #2 of 3 Lab model card
WildSpeech-Bench 74.3 #2 of 3 Lab model card
DECIDE 30.5 #6 of 8 Official leaderboard
AgenticVBench 36.8% #1 of 1 Lab model card
HumMusQA 75.8% #1 of 1 Lab model card
LongAudioSpan 82.7% #1 of 1 Lab model card
LVOmniBench 63.3% #1 of 1 Lab model card
MMOU 78.8% #1 of 1 Lab model card
MusTBench 50.6% #1 of 1 Lab model card
OmniCap-IF 80.6% #1 of 1 Lab model card
SpotSoundBench 67.2% #1 of 1 Lab model card

Its lab's numbers put it at 154.6, number 62 of 404

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 15 capability results Qwen reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 152.1 to 157.1. How we compute it.

Its lab's number next to a leaderboard

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
Daily-Omni 85.1% DailyOmni Audio-Visual Understanding 85.1% Leaderboard, Omni-Modal Language Models (With Visual and Audio) Same

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 2 of them aren't in the launch post.