Benchmark Almanac

OpenAI Dynamic Mental Health Benchmarks

Only in system cards

Multi-turn conversations with adversarial simulated users on mental-health risks. Scored on safe and supportive responses.

Made by
OpenAI
Kind
Wellbeing and sycophancy
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Kept private
Last in a system card
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026
20
System cards report it, from 1 lab

No scores here yet

No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for OpenAI Dynamic Mental Health Benchmarks yet.

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

20 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 29, 2026 GPT-6 Luna system card addendum Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, 3 categories, no overall score (Table 7) Health
Oct 26, 2026 GPT-6.1 Terra system card addendum Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, 3 categories, no overall score (Table 28) Health
Oct 7, 2026 GPT-6 Sol system card addendum Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, 3 categories, no overall score (Table 7) Health
Oct 7, 2026 GPT-6 Luna system card addendum Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, 3 categories, no overall score (Table 7) Health
Sep 29, 2026 GPT-6.1 Sol system card addendum Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, 3 categories, no overall score (Table 8) Health
Sep 22, 2026 GPT-6 Sol system card Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, 3 categories, no overall score (Table 30, A.4.2) Health
Sep 22, 2026 GPT-6 Luna system card Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, 3 categories, no overall score (Table 30, A.4.2) Health
Sep 3, 2026 GPT-6 Astra system card Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, 3 categories, no overall score (Table 7) Health
Aug 6, 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card addendum Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, not_unsafe, 3 categories, no overall score (3.4) Health
Aug 6, 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna system card addendum Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, not_unsafe, 3 categories, no overall score (3.4) Health
Jul 9, 2026 GPT-5.6 Terra system card Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, not_unsafe, 3 categories, no overall score (5.2) Health
Jul 9, 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, not_unsafe, 3 categories, no overall score (5.2) Health
Jul 9, 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna system card Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, not_unsafe, 3 categories, no overall score (5.2) Health
Jun 25, 2026 GPT-5.6 Terra system card Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, not_unsafe, 3 categories, no overall score (5.2) Health
Jun 25, 2026 GPT-5.6 Sol system card Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, not_unsafe, 3 categories, no overall score (5.2) Health
Jun 25, 2026 GPT-5.6 Luna system card Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, not_unsafe, 3 categories, no overall score (5.2) Health
May 4, 2026 GPT-5.5 Instant system card Dynamic Mental Health Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, not_unsafe, 3 categories, no overall score: mental health 0.999, emotional reliance 0.963, self-harm 0.913 (Table 3) Health
Apr 23, 2026 GPT-5.5 system card Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, not_unsafe, 3 categories, no overall score (Table 8) Health
Mar 17, 2026 GPT-5.4 Mini system card Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, 3 categories, no overall score (Table 17) Safety
Mar 5, 2026 GPT-5.4 system card Dynamic Benchmarks with Adversarial User Simulations, not_unsafe, 3 categories, no overall score (Table 2) Safety

More in Safety and alignment

All 465 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. Gemini 4 Carbon 0%
  • DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics. Muse Spark 1.2 88.4%
  • Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) In use Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage. Claude Opus 4.5 89%
  • IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%