Benchmark Almanac

OSWorld-MCP

Kimi K2.5 56.6% leads since January 2026
Not in model cards

Computer-use agents complete OSWorld desktop tasks while they can also call 158 MCP tools across 7 common applications. The benchmark checks whether agents pick a tool call or GUI actions at the right time. It reports task accuracy, tool invocation rate and average completion steps.

Results are given at 15 and 50 step limits. Later entries ran once, the original ones three times, and some used model-specific prompts, so the board warns they are not strictly comparable. About 239 GitHub stars and 24 HF paper upvotes.

Released
October 2025
Kind
Desktop apps
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 3.1 Pro #39 on the capability index
Last model added
February 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

With advances in decision-making and reasoning capabilities, multimodal agents show strong potential in computer application scenarios. Past evaluations have mainly assessed GUI interaction skills, while tool invocation abilities, such as those enabled by the Model Context Protocol (MCP), have been largely overlooked. Comparing agents with integrated tool invocation to those evaluated only on GUI interaction is inherently unfair. We present OSWorld-MCP, the first comprehensive and fair benchmark for assessing computer-use agents' tool invocation, GUI operation, and decision-making abilities in a real-world environment. We design a novel automated code-generation pipeline to create tools and combine them with a curated selection from existing tools. Rigorous manual validation yields 158 high-quality tools (covering 7 common applications), each verified for correct functionality, practical applicability, and versatility. Extensive evaluations of state-of-the-art multimodal agents on OSWorld-MCP show that MCP tools generally improve task success rates (e.g., from 8.3% to 20.4% for OpenAI o3 at 15 steps, from 40.1% to 43.3% for Claude 4 Sonnet at 50 steps), underscoring the importance of assessing tool invocation capabilities. However, even the strongest models have relatively low tool invocation rates, Only 36.3%, indicating room for improvement and highlighting the benchmark's challenge. By explicitly measuring MCP tool usage skills, OSWorld-MCP deepens understanding of multimodal agents and sets a new standard for evaluating performance in complex, tool-assisted environments. Our code, environment, and data are publicly available at https://osworld-mcp.github.io.

Abstract of OSWorld-MCP: Benchmarking MCP Tool Invocation In Computer-Use Agents (arXiv:2510.24563, CC0)
11
Entries on its own leaderboard, 9 models we track

Kimi K2.5 leads with 56.6% among models released by February 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Kimi K2.5 Max Steps: 50 Runs: 1 Prompt: specific prompt 56.6%
  2. 2 OpenAI o3 + UI-TARS-1.5-72B Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 49.5%
  3. 3 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Steps: 50 Runs: 1 Prompt: unified prompt 49.5%
  4. 4 Claude Sonnet 4 thinking; Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 45%
  5. 5 Gemini 3.1 Pro Max Steps: 50 Runs: 1 Prompt: unified prompt 44.2%
  6. 6 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B thinking; Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 39.5%
  7. 7 Seed1.5-VL Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 38.2%
  8. 8 Qwen3.5-Plus Max Steps: 50 Runs: 1 Prompt: specific prompt 37.6%
  9. 9 gemini-2.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 25.7%
  10. 10 o3 Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 24.1%
  11. 11 Qwen2.5-VL-72B Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 15.6%

Source: Official OSWorld-MCP leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Kimi K2.5 56.6% Max Steps: 50 Runs: 1 Prompt: specific prompt Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
2 OpenAI o3 + UI-TARS-1.5-72B 49.5% Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt, Agent-S2.5 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Sonnet 4.5 49.5% Max Steps: 50 Runs: 1 Prompt: unified prompt Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Sonnet 4 45% thinking; Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt May 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 3.1 Pro 44.2% Max Steps: 50 Runs: 1 Prompt: unified prompt Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 39.5% thinking; Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Seed1.5-VL 38.2% Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt May 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen3.5-Plus 37.6% Max Steps: 50 Runs: 1 Prompt: specific prompt Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
9 gemini-2.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) 25.7% Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt Official leaderboard
10 o3 24.1% Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 15.6% Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt Jan 2025 Official leaderboard

More effort adds a median 8 points

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
Kimi K2.5
Max Steps: … Max Steps: …
56.6%
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Max Steps: … Max Steps: …
49.5%
Claude Sonnet 4
thinking; M… thinking; M…
45%
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Max Steps: … Max Steps: …
44.2%
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
thinking; M… thinking; M…
39.5%
Seed1.5-VL
Max Steps: … Max Steps: …
38.2%
Qwen3.5-Plus
Max Steps: … Max Steps: …
37.6%
o3
Max Steps: … Max Steps: …
24.1%
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
Max Steps: …
15.6%

Source: Official OSWorld-MCP leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
Kimi K2.5 Max Steps: 50 Runs: 1 Prompt: specific prompt 56.6%
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Steps: 50 Runs: 1 Prompt: unified prompt 49.5%
Claude Sonnet 4 thinking; Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 45%
Gemini 3.1 Pro Max Steps: 50 Runs: 1 Prompt: unified prompt 44.2%
Kimi K2.5 Max Steps: 15 Runs: 1 Prompt: specific prompt 42.8%
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B thinking; Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 39.5%
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Max Steps: 15 Runs: 1 Prompt: unified prompt 38.9%
Seed1.5-VL Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 38.2%
Qwen3.5-Plus Max Steps: 50 Runs: 1 Prompt: specific prompt 37.6%
Claude Sonnet 4 thinking; Max Steps: 15 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 36.1%
Gemini 3.1 Pro Max Steps: 15 Runs: 1 Prompt: unified prompt 34.1%
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B thinking; Max Steps: 15 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 32.8%
Qwen3.5-Plus Max Steps: 15 Runs: 1 Prompt: specific prompt 31.5%
Seed1.5-VL Max Steps: 15 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 30.7%
o3 Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 24.1%
o3 Max Steps: 15 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 17.6%
Qwen2.5-VL-72B Max Steps: 50 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 15.6%
Qwen2.5-VL-72B Max Steps: 15 Runs: 3 Prompt: unified prompt 14.5%

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in October 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic Moonshot AI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Feb 2026
Kimi K2.5 56.6%

Source: Official OSWorld-MCP leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K2.5 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Claude Sonnet 4 Seed1.5-VL o3 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Kimi K2.5 Claude Sonnet 4.5

Source: Official OSWorld-MCP leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Computer and browser use

All 69 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%