PROWBench
Programmable world models must render video that follows the rules and interactions their program specifies. The test checks visual fidelity to fine-grained rules.
48 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.
- Made by
- Alaya Lab
- Released
- October 2026
- Kind
- Interactive world models
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Last model added
- September 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Programmable world models separate executable dynamics from visual generation, offering a promising foundation for next-generation game engines. However, their visual adherence to explicit rules and interactions remains insufficiently evaluated. Existing benchmarks assess visual quality, controllability, and instruction or physical adherence, but rarely test fidelity to fine-grained, program-specified world events. We introduce PROWBench, comprising 170 programmatically constructed episodes and 600 proxy videos covering diverse scenes and interactions. PROWBench logs entity states and timestamped events, including those outside the camera's field of view, as replayable world records, from which it renders synchronized views and proxy representations. This enables generated videos to be checked against the observable consequences of program execution. An extensible framework constructs scenes, controls behaviors, and can render each camera view in different representations, such as coarse 3D, and bounding boxes. The benchmark covers first- and third-person perspectives, with synchronized multi-view observations available for a subset of episodes. Grounded in these records, PROWBench evaluates entity control, long-horizon memory, and, with two VLM-based metrics, Logic-Render Alignment and Interaction Success Rate, adherence to the prescribed timeline and the visual realization of timestamped engine-recorded events.
LynnReal-Omni tops the leaderboard with 68.9
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is MiniMax H3, at 68.0.
- 1 LynnReal-Omni inputs FF+B 68.9
- 2
MiniMax H3 inputs FF+B 68.0
- 3 Seedance 2.5 inputs FF+B 67.0
- 4
Code World Model (CWM) inputs M+FF+D 67.0
- 5 LingBot-World 2.0 inputs FF+C; Bidirectional checkpoint 65.6
- 6 EchoWM inputs FF+C; Base checkpoint 64.0
- 7 SANA-WM inputs FF+C; Bidirectional checkpoint 62.9
- 8 C2R inputs P 62.8
- 9 Cosmos-Transfer2.5 inputs D+CS 62.8
- 10 AlayaWorld v1.1 inputs FF+C; Camera-controlled Stage2b AR teacher with Stage3 DMD adapter; 4 denoising steps per rollout round 61.3
Source: Official PROWBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LynnReal-Omni | 68.9 | inputs FF+B | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 68.0 | inputs FF+B | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Seedance 2.5 | 67.0 | inputs FF+B | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 67.0 | inputs M+FF+D | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | LingBot-World 2.0 | 65.6 | inputs FF+C; Bidirectional checkpoint | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | EchoWM | 64.0 | inputs FF+C; Base checkpoint | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | SANA-WM | 62.9 | inputs FF+C; Bidirectional checkpoint | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | C2R | 62.8 | inputs P | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Cosmos-Transfer2.5 | 62.8 | inputs D+CS | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | AlayaWorld v1.1 | 61.3 | inputs FF+C; Camera-controlled Stage2b AR teacher with Stage3 DMD adapter; 4 denoising steps per rollout round | Official leaderboard |
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official PROWBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in World models
- AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. GPT-5.4 58.3
- IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy.
Muse Spark Open 68.3%
- QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions.
Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
- VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems.
Gemini 3 Pro 91%
- ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics.
Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
- RBench Only in system cards 650 image+text prompts for robot video generation (tasks and embodiments). MLLM judge scores task completion, physical plausibility, stability.
Wan 2.6 60.7%