Benchmark Almanac

PROWBench

LynnReal-Omni 68.9 tops its leaderboard MiniMax H3 68.0 leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Programmable world models must render video that follows the rules and interactions their program specifies. The test checks visual fidelity to fine-grained rules.

48 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.

Made by
Alaya Lab
Released
October 2026
Kind
Interactive world models
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last model added
September 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Programmable world models separate executable dynamics from visual generation, offering a promising foundation for next-generation game engines. However, their visual adherence to explicit rules and interactions remains insufficiently evaluated. Existing benchmarks assess visual quality, controllability, and instruction or physical adherence, but rarely test fidelity to fine-grained, program-specified world events. We introduce PROWBench, comprising 170 programmatically constructed episodes and 600 proxy videos covering diverse scenes and interactions. PROWBench logs entity states and timestamped events, including those outside the camera's field of view, as replayable world records, from which it renders synchronized views and proxy representations. This enables generated videos to be checked against the observable consequences of program execution. An extensible framework constructs scenes, controls behaviors, and can render each camera view in different representations, such as coarse 3D, and bounding boxes. The benchmark covers first- and third-person perspectives, with synchronized multi-view observations available for a subset of episodes. Grounded in these records, PROWBench evaluates entity control, long-horizon memory, and, with two VLM-based metrics, Logic-Render Alignment and Interaction Success Rate, adherence to the prescribed timeline and the visual realization of timestamped engine-recorded events.

Abstract of PROWBench: Do Video Models Render What the Program Specifies? (arXiv:2610.02205, CC0)
10
Entries on its own leaderboard, 2 models we track

LynnReal-Omni tops the leaderboard with 68.9

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is MiniMax H3, at 68.0.

  1. 1 LynnReal-Omni inputs FF+B 68.9
  2. 2 MiniMax H3 inputs FF+B 68.0
  3. 3 Seedance 2.5 inputs FF+B 67.0
  4. 4 Code World Model (CWM) inputs M+FF+D 67.0
  5. 5 LingBot-World 2.0 inputs FF+C; Bidirectional checkpoint 65.6
  6. 6 EchoWM inputs FF+C; Base checkpoint 64.0
  7. 7 SANA-WM inputs FF+C; Bidirectional checkpoint 62.9
  8. 8 C2R inputs P 62.8
  9. 9 Cosmos-Transfer2.5 inputs D+CS 62.8
  10. 10 AlayaWorld v1.1 inputs FF+C; Camera-controlled Stage2b AR teacher with Stage3 DMD adapter; 4 denoising steps per rollout round 61.3

Source: Official PROWBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 LynnReal-Omni 68.9 inputs FF+B Official leaderboard
2 MiniMax H3 68.0 inputs FF+B Official leaderboard
3 Seedance 2.5 67.0 inputs FF+B Official leaderboard
4 Code World Model (CWM) 67.0 inputs M+FF+D Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
5 LingBot-World 2.0 65.6 inputs FF+C; Bidirectional checkpoint Official leaderboard
6 EchoWM 64.0 inputs FF+C; Base checkpoint Official leaderboard
7 SANA-WM 62.9 inputs FF+C; Bidirectional checkpoint Official leaderboard
8 C2R 62.8 inputs P Official leaderboard
9 Cosmos-Transfer2.5 62.8 inputs D+CS Official leaderboard
10 AlayaWorld v1.1 61.3 inputs FF+C; Camera-controlled Stage2b AR teacher with Stage3 DMD adapter; 4 denoising steps per rollout round Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
67.0 67.0

Source: Official PROWBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in World models

All 39 in World models
  • AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. GPT-5.4 58.3
  • IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy. Muse Spark Open 68.3%
  • QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions. Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
  • VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems. Gemini 3 Pro 91%
  • ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics. Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
  • RBench Only in system cards 650 image+text prompts for robot video generation (tasks and embodiments). MLLM judge scores task completion, physical plausibility, stability. Wan 2.6 60.7%