Benchmark Almanac

PubMedQA

Claude 3 Sonnet 78.3% leads since March 2024
GPT-4 Jun 2023 82% leads since June 2023
GPT-4 Jun 2023 82% leads since June 2023
Dropped

Models answer biomedical research questions with yes, no, or maybe, given a PubMed abstract without its conclusion. Scored by accuracy.

Released
September 2019
Kind
Medicine
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3 Opus #172 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
March 2024, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
April 2024
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce PubMedQA, a novel biomedical question answering (QA) dataset collected from PubMed abstracts. The task of PubMedQA is to answer research questions with yes/no/maybe (e.g.: Do preoperative statins reduce atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting?) using the corresponding abstracts. PubMedQA has 1k expert-annotated, 61.2k unlabeled and 211.3k artificially generated QA instances. Each PubMedQA instance is composed of (1) a question which is either an existing research article title or derived from one, (2) a context which is the corresponding abstract without its conclusion, (3) a long answer, which is the conclusion of the abstract and, presumably, answers the research question, and (4) a yes/no/maybe answer which summarizes the conclusion. PubMedQA is the first QA dataset where reasoning over biomedical research texts, especially their quantitative contents, is required to answer the questions. Our best performing model, multi-phase fine-tuning of BioBERT with long answer bag-of-word statistics as additional supervision, achieves 68.1% accuracy, compared to single human performance of 78.0% accuracy and majority-baseline of 55.2% accuracy, leaving much room for improvement. PubMedQA is publicly available at https://pubmedqa.github.io.

Abstract of PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answering (arXiv:1909.06146, CC0)
3
Models scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Claude 3 Sonnet leads with 78.3% among models released by March 2024

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

GPT-4 leads with 82% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

GPT-4 leads with 82%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in March 2024, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude 3 Sonnet 78.3%
  2. 2 Claude 3 Haiku 76%
  3. 3 Claude 3 Opus 75.8%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Source: Official PubMedQA leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3 Sonnet 78.3% Mar 2024 Lab model card
2 Claude 3 Haiku 76% Mar 2024 Lab model card
3 Claude 3 Opus 75.8% Mar 2024 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4 Jun 2023 82% Medprompt Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4 Mar 2023 75.2% Mar 2023 Official leaderboard
3 Reka Core 74.6% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4 Jun 2023 82% Medprompt Jun 2023 Official leaderboard
2 Claude 3 Sonnet 78.3% Mar 2024 Lab model card
3 Claude 3 Haiku 76% Mar 2024 Lab model card
4 Claude 3 Opus 75.8% Mar 2024 Lab model card
5 GPT-4 Mar 2023 75.2% Mar 2023 Official leaderboard
6 Reka Core 74.6% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 24 entries, 3 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one across all independent runs since 2023 2 models have held number one with claims included since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2024
GPT-4 82%
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2024

Sources: Official PubMedQA leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4 GPT-4 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4 GPT-4

Sources: Official PubMedQA leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since March 2024

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Anthropic
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Opus 75.8 PubMedQA (5-shot)

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Sonnet model card 78.3 PubMedQA, 5-shot. 0-shot 79.7 (Table 1) Capabilities
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Opus model card 75.8 PubMedQA, 5-shot. 0-shot 74.9 (Table 1) Capabilities
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Haiku model card 76 PubMedQA, 5-shot. 0-shot 78.5 (Table 1) Capabilities

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 179 in Law, finance and medicine
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy. Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%