PubMedQA
Models answer biomedical research questions with yes, no, or maybe, given a PubMed abstract without its conclusion. Scored by accuracy.
- Made by
- University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University
- Released
- September 2019
- Kind
- Medicine
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude 3 Opus #172 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- March 2024, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- April 2024
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We introduce PubMedQA, a novel biomedical question answering (QA) dataset collected from PubMed abstracts. The task of PubMedQA is to answer research questions with yes/no/maybe (e.g.: Do preoperative statins reduce atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting?) using the corresponding abstracts. PubMedQA has 1k expert-annotated, 61.2k unlabeled and 211.3k artificially generated QA instances. Each PubMedQA instance is composed of (1) a question which is either an existing research article title or derived from one, (2) a context which is the corresponding abstract without its conclusion, (3) a long answer, which is the conclusion of the abstract and, presumably, answers the research question, and (4) a yes/no/maybe answer which summarizes the conclusion. PubMedQA is the first QA dataset where reasoning over biomedical research texts, especially their quantitative contents, is required to answer the questions. Our best performing model, multi-phase fine-tuning of BioBERT with long answer bag-of-word statistics as additional supervision, achieves 68.1% accuracy, compared to single human performance of 78.0% accuracy and majority-baseline of 55.2% accuracy, leaving much room for improvement. PubMedQA is publicly available at https://pubmedqa.github.io.
Claude 3 Sonnet leads with 78.3% among models released by March 2024
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
GPT-4 leads with 82% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
GPT-4 leads with 82%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in March 2024, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Claude 3 Sonnet 78.3%
- 2 Claude 3 Haiku 76%
- 3 Claude 3 Opus 75.8%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 GPT-4 Jun 2023 82%
- 2 GPT-4 Mar 2023 75.2%
- 3 Reka Core 74.6%
Source: Official PubMedQA leaderboard
- 1 GPT-4 Jun 2023 82%
- 2 Claude 3 Sonnet 78.3%
- 3 Claude 3 Haiku 76%
- 4 Claude 3 Opus 75.8%
- 5 GPT-4 Mar 2023 75.2%
- 6 Reka Core 74.6%
Sources: Official PubMedQA leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 78.3% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Claude 3 Haiku | 76% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Claude 3 Opus | 75.8% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4 Jun 2023 | 82% | Medprompt | Jun 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | GPT-4 Mar 2023 | 75.2% | Mar 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Reka Core | 74.6% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4 Jun 2023 | 82% | Medprompt | Jun 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 78.3% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Claude 3 Haiku | 76% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | Claude 3 Opus | 75.8% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | GPT-4 Mar 2023 | 75.2% | Mar 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Reka Core | 74.6% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 24 entries, 3 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one across all independent runs since 2023 2 models have held number one with claims included since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official PubMedQA leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official PubMedQA leaderboard and labs’ model cards
No launch post has listed it since March 2024
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Opus | 75.8 | PubMedQA (5-shot) |
3 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Sonnet model card | 78.3 | PubMedQA, 5-shot. 0-shot 79.7 (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Opus model card | 75.8 | PubMedQA, 5-shot. 0-shot 74.9 (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Haiku model card | 76 | PubMedQA, 5-shot. 0-shot 78.5 (Table 1) | Capabilities |
More in Law, finance and medicine
- MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
- HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
- HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
- FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy.
Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
- KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items.
Solar Pro 4 77.5%
- KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024.
Solar Pro 4 93.2%