Benchmark Almanac

QuAC

Dropped

Models answer free-form questions in information-seeking dialogs about a hidden Wikipedia section, across 100K questions. Scored by word-level F1.

Released
August 2018
Kind
Reading comprehension
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
Public, plus a private test set
Strongest model tested
Llama 3-70B #181 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
April 2024, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
November 2024

In the authors’ words

We present QuAC, a dataset for Question Answering in Context that contains 14K information-seeking QA dialogs (100K questions in total). The dialogs involve two crowd workers: (1) a student who poses a sequence of freeform questions to learn as much as possible about a hidden Wikipedia text, and (2) a teacher who answers the questions by providing short excerpts from the text. QuAC introduces challenges not found in existing machine comprehension datasets: its questions are often more open-ended, unanswerable, or only meaningful within the dialog context, as we show in a detailed qualitative evaluation. We also report results for a number of reference models, including a recently state-of-the-art reading comprehension architecture extended to model dialog context. Our best model underperforms humans by 20 F1, suggesting that there is significant room for future work on this data. Dataset, baseline, and leaderboard available at http://quac.ai.

Abstract of QuAC : Question Answering in Context (arXiv:1808.07036, CC0)
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
12
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Llama 3-70B leads with 51.1%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Llama 3-70B 51.1%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Llama 3-70B 51.1% Apr 2024 Lab model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Llama 3-70B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Llama 3-70B

Source: Labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since April 2024

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Meta
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Apr 18, 2024 Llama 3-70B 51.1 QuAC (1-shot, F1) [pretrained]

12 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-8B technical report 44.9 QuAC, pretrained (Table 9) Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-70B technical report 51.1 QuAC, pretrained (Table 9) Capabilities
Nov 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-405B technical report 53.6 QuAC, pretrained (Table 9) Capabilities
Jul 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-8B model card 44.9 QuAC (F1), 1-shot, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
Jul 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-70B model card 51.1 QuAC (F1), 1-shot, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
Jul 23, 2024 Llama 3.1-405B model card 53.6 QuAC (F1), 1-shot, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
Apr 18, 2024 Llama 3-8B model card 44.4 QuAC (1-shot, F1), pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
Apr 18, 2024 Llama 3-70B model card 51.1 QuAC (1-shot, F1), pretrained (Base pretrained models table) Capabilities
Jul 19, 2023 Llama 2-7B technical report 39.4 QuAC (f1), 0-shot, pretrained (Table 23) Capabilities
Jul 19, 2023 Llama 2-70B technical report 42.4 QuAC (f1), 0-shot, pretrained (Table 23) Capabilities
Jul 19, 2023 Llama 2-34B technical report 42.9 QuAC (f1), 0-shot, pretrained (Table 23) Capabilities
Jul 19, 2023 Llama 2-13B technical report 42.7 QuAC (f1), 0-shot, pretrained (Table 23) Capabilities

More in Knowledge

All 121 in Knowledge
  • MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects. Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
  • SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy. Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
  • WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1. Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
  • BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly. Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
  • KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry. Solar Pro 4 79.2%
  • HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed. Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%