QuAC
Models answer free-form questions in information-seeking dialogs about a hidden Wikipedia section, across 100K questions. Scored by word-level F1.
- Released
- August 2018
- Kind
- Reading comprehension
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
- Strongest model tested
-
Llama 3-70B #181 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- April 2024, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- November 2024
In the authors’ words
We present QuAC, a dataset for Question Answering in Context that contains 14K information-seeking QA dialogs (100K questions in total). The dialogs involve two crowd workers: (1) a student who poses a sequence of freeform questions to learn as much as possible about a hidden Wikipedia text, and (2) a teacher who answers the questions by providing short excerpts from the text. QuAC introduces challenges not found in existing machine comprehension datasets: its questions are often more open-ended, unanswerable, or only meaningful within the dialog context, as we show in a detailed qualitative evaluation. We also report results for a number of reference models, including a recently state-of-the-art reading comprehension architecture extended to model dialog context. Our best model underperforms humans by 20 F1, suggesting that there is significant room for future work on this data. Dataset, baseline, and leaderboard available at http://quac.ai.
Llama 3-70B leads with 51.1%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
- 1
Llama 3-70B 51.1%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 51.1% | Apr 2024 | Lab model card |
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
No launch post has listed it since April 2024
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2024 | 51.1 | QuAC (1-shot, F1) [pretrained] |
12 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2024 | | 44.9 | QuAC, pretrained (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Nov 23, 2024 | | 51.1 | QuAC, pretrained (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Nov 23, 2024 | | 53.6 | QuAC, pretrained (Table 9) | Capabilities |
| Jul 23, 2024 | | 44.9 | QuAC (F1), 1-shot, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) | Capabilities |
| Jul 23, 2024 | | 51.1 | QuAC (F1), 1-shot, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) | Capabilities |
| Jul 23, 2024 | | 53.6 | QuAC (F1), 1-shot, pretrained (Base pretrained models table) | Capabilities |
| Apr 18, 2024 | | 44.4 | QuAC (1-shot, F1), pretrained (Base pretrained models table) | Capabilities |
| Apr 18, 2024 | | 51.1 | QuAC (1-shot, F1), pretrained (Base pretrained models table) | Capabilities |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 39.4 | QuAC (f1), 0-shot, pretrained (Table 23) | Capabilities |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 42.4 | QuAC (f1), 0-shot, pretrained (Table 23) | Capabilities |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 42.9 | QuAC (f1), 0-shot, pretrained (Table 23) | Capabilities |
| Jul 19, 2023 | | 42.7 | QuAC (f1), 0-shot, pretrained (Table 23) | Capabilities |
More in Knowledge
- MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects.
Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
- SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
- WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1.
Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
- BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly.
Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
- KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry.
Solar Pro 4 79.2%
- HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed.
Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%