Benchmark Almanac

PAI-Bench

Cosmos3-Super 83.9% tops its leaderboard Cosmos3-Nano 83.7% leads the models we track
Cosmos3-Nano 83.7% leads since May 2026
Only in system cards

Physical-AI video generation from 1,044 prompts in six domains, VLM-QA plus quality metrics. Companion control and understanding tracks.

Generation score compressed near the real-video reference (Source 82.6. Cosmos3-Super 83.9 exceeds it). Robot domain spreads more (55-90).

Made by
SHI Labs + NVIDIA
Released
December 2025
Kind
Video world models
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last in a system card
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Physical AI aims to develop models that can perceive and predict real-world dynamics; yet, the extent to which current multi-modal large language models and video generative models support these abilities is insufficiently understood. We introduce Physical AI Bench (PAI-Bench), a unified and comprehensive benchmark that evaluates perception and prediction capabilities across video generation, conditional video generation, and video understanding, comprising 2,808 real-world cases with task-aligned metrics designed to capture physical plausibility and domain-specific reasoning. Our study provides a systematic assessment of recent models and shows that video generative models, despite strong visual fidelity, often struggle to maintain physically coherent dynamics, while multi-modal large language models exhibit limited performance in forecasting and causal interpretation. These observations suggest that current systems are still at an early stage in handling the perceptual and predictive demands of Physical AI. In summary, PAI-Bench establishes a realistic foundation for evaluating Physical AI and highlights key gaps that future systems must address.

Abstract of PAI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark For Physical AI (arXiv:2512.01989, CC0)
19
Entries on its own leaderboard, 6 models we track
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Cosmos3-Super tops the leaderboard with 83.9%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Cosmos3-Nano, at 83.7%.

Cosmos3-Nano leads with 83.7%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Cosmos3-Super 83.9%
  2. 2 Cosmos3-Nano 83.7%
  3. 3 Veo 3 82.1%
  4. 4 Cosmos3-Edge 81.1%
  5. 5 Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B 81%
  6. 6 Cosmos-Predict2.5-2B 81%
  7. 7 Wan2.2-I2V-A14B 80.6%
  8. 8 Wan2.2-TI2V-5B 80.4%
  9. 9 Cosmos-Predict2-14B-Video2World 80%
  10. 10 Wan2.1-I2V-14B-720P 79.8%
  11. 11 Cosmos-Predict2-2B-Video2World 79.6%
  12. 12 MAGI-1-24B 78.5%
  13. 13 CogVideoX1.5-5B-I2V 78.3%
  14. 14 CogVideoX-5b-I2V 77.9%
  15. 15 LTX-Video-13B 77.9%
  16. 16 HunyuanVideo-I2V 77.4%
  17. 17 LTX-Video-2B 76.9%
  18. 18 MAGI-1-4.5B 76.9%
  19. 19 DynamiCrafter_1024 69.7%

Source: Official PAI-Bench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Cosmos3-Super 83.9% Official leaderboard
2 Cosmos3-Nano 83.7% May 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Veo 3 82.1% Official leaderboard
4 Cosmos3-Edge 81.1% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B 81% Official leaderboard
6 Cosmos-Predict2.5-2B 81% Official leaderboard
7 Wan2.2-I2V-A14B 80.6% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Wan2.2-TI2V-5B 80.4% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Cosmos-Predict2-14B-Video2World 80% Official leaderboard
10 Wan2.1-I2V-14B-720P 79.8% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Cosmos-Predict2-2B-Video2World 79.6% Official leaderboard
12 MAGI-1-24B 78.5% Official leaderboard
13 CogVideoX1.5-5B-I2V 78.3% Official leaderboard
14 CogVideoX-5b-I2V 77.9% Official leaderboard
15 LTX-Video-13B 77.9% Official leaderboard
16 HunyuanVideo-I2V 77.4% Official leaderboard
17 LTX-Video-2B 76.9% Official leaderboard
18 MAGI-1-4.5B 76.9% Official leaderboard
19 DynamiCrafter_1024 69.7% Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Cosmos3-Nano 83.7% May 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Veo 3 82.1% Official leaderboard
3 Cosmos3-Edge 81.1% Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Wan2.2-I2V-A14B 80.6% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Wan2.2-TI2V-5B 80.4% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Wan2.1-I2V-14B-720P 79.8% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 63.8% Oct 2026 Lab model card

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in December 2025 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Alibaba Group NVIDIA
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jul 2026
Cosmos3-Nano 83.7%

Source: Official PAI-Bench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Cosmos3-Nano Wan2.2-I2V-A14B Wan2.1-I2V-14B-720P 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Cosmos3-Nano Wan2.1-I2V-14B-720P

Sources: Official PAI-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL technical report 63.8 PAI-Bench, SpatialClaw harness, with agentic vision training, Table 7 Capabilities
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Nano technical report 79.4 Cosmos3-Nano text-to-video PAIBench-G Overall, Table 12. Also Cosmos3-Nano image-to-video PAIBench-G Overall, Table 12 82.7 Capabilities

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Cosmos3-Nano 79.4% Cosmos3-Nano text-to-video PAIBench-G Overall, Table 12. Also Cosmos3-Nano image-to-video PAIBench-G Overall, Table 12 82.7 83.7% Leaderboard −4.3 pts

More in World models

All 39 in World models
  • AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. GPT-5.4 58.3
  • IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy. Muse Spark Open 68.3%
  • QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions. Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
  • VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems. Gemini 3 Pro 91%
  • ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics. Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
  • RBench Only in system cards 650 image+text prompts for robot video generation (tasks and embodiments). MLLM judge scores task completion, physical plausibility, stability. Wan 2.6 60.7%