PAI-Bench
Physical-AI video generation from 1,044 prompts in six domains, VLM-QA plus quality metrics. Companion control and understanding tracks.
Generation score compressed near the real-video reference (Source 82.6. Cosmos3-Super 83.9 exceeds it). Robot domain spreads more (55-90).
- Released
- December 2025
- Kind
- Video world models
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Last in a system card
- October 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Physical AI aims to develop models that can perceive and predict real-world dynamics; yet, the extent to which current multi-modal large language models and video generative models support these abilities is insufficiently understood. We introduce Physical AI Bench (PAI-Bench), a unified and comprehensive benchmark that evaluates perception and prediction capabilities across video generation, conditional video generation, and video understanding, comprising 2,808 real-world cases with task-aligned metrics designed to capture physical plausibility and domain-specific reasoning. Our study provides a systematic assessment of recent models and shows that video generative models, despite strong visual fidelity, often struggle to maintain physically coherent dynamics, while multi-modal large language models exhibit limited performance in forecasting and causal interpretation. These observations suggest that current systems are still at an early stage in handling the perceptual and predictive demands of Physical AI. In summary, PAI-Bench establishes a realistic foundation for evaluating Physical AI and highlights key gaps that future systems must address.
Cosmos3-Super tops the leaderboard with 83.9%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Cosmos3-Nano, at 83.7%.
Cosmos3-Nano leads with 83.7%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 83.9 Cosmos3-Super
- 83.7
Cosmos3-Nano
- 82.1
Veo 3
- 81.1
Cosmos3-Edge
- 81.0 Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B
- 81.0 Cosmos-Predict2.5-2B
- 80.6
Wan2.2-I2V-A14B
- 80.4
Wan2.2-TI2V-5B
- 80.0 Cosmos-Predict2-14B-Video2World
- 79.8
Wan2.1-I2V-14B-720P
- 79.6 Cosmos-Predict2-2B-Video2World
- 78.5 MAGI-1-24B
- 78.3 CogVideoX1.5-5B-I2V
- 77.9 CogVideoX-5b-I2V
- 77.9 LTX-Video-13B
- 77.4 HunyuanVideo-I2V
- 76.9 LTX-Video-2B
- 76.9 MAGI-1-4.5B
- 69.7 DynamiCrafter_1024
- 1 Cosmos3-Super 83.9%
- 2
Cosmos3-Nano 83.7%
- 3
Veo 3 82.1%
- 4
Cosmos3-Edge 81.1%
- 5 Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B 81%
- 6 Cosmos-Predict2.5-2B 81%
- 7
Wan2.2-I2V-A14B 80.6%
- 8
Wan2.2-TI2V-5B 80.4%
- 9 Cosmos-Predict2-14B-Video2World 80%
- 10
Wan2.1-I2V-14B-720P 79.8%
- 11 Cosmos-Predict2-2B-Video2World 79.6%
- 12 MAGI-1-24B 78.5%
- 13 CogVideoX1.5-5B-I2V 78.3%
- 14 CogVideoX-5b-I2V 77.9%
- 15 LTX-Video-13B 77.9%
- 16 HunyuanVideo-I2V 77.4%
- 17 LTX-Video-2B 76.9%
- 18 MAGI-1-4.5B 76.9%
- 19 DynamiCrafter_1024 69.7%
Source: Official PAI-Bench leaderboard
- 1
Cosmos3-Nano 83.7%
- 2
Veo 3 82.1%
- 3
Cosmos3-Edge 81.1%
- 4
Wan2.2-I2V-A14B 80.6%
- 5
Wan2.2-TI2V-5B 80.4%
- 6
Wan2.1-I2V-14B-720P 79.8%
- 7
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 63.8%
Sources: Official PAI-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cosmos3-Super | 83.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | | 83.7% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 82.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | | 81.1% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Cosmos-Predict2.5-14B | 81% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | Cosmos-Predict2.5-2B | 81% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | | 80.6% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 80.4% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Cosmos-Predict2-14B-Video2World | 80% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 79.8% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Cosmos-Predict2-2B-Video2World | 79.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | MAGI-1-24B | 78.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | CogVideoX1.5-5B-I2V | 78.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | CogVideoX-5b-I2V | 77.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | LTX-Video-13B | 77.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | HunyuanVideo-I2V | 77.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | LTX-Video-2B | 76.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | MAGI-1-4.5B | 76.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 19 | DynamiCrafter_1024 | 69.7% | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 83.7% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 82.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | | 81.1% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 80.6% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 80.4% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 79.8% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 63.8% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in December 2025 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official PAI-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official PAI-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | | 63.8 | PAI-Bench, SpatialClaw harness, with agentic vision training, Table 7 | Capabilities |
| May 31, 2026 | | 79.4 | Cosmos3-Nano text-to-video PAIBench-G Overall, Table 12. Also Cosmos3-Nano image-to-video PAIBench-G Overall, Table 12 82.7 | Capabilities |
One lab claim next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 79.4% Cosmos3-Nano text-to-video PAIBench-G Overall, Table 12. Also Cosmos3-Nano image-to-video PAIBench-G Overall, Table 12 82.7 | 83.7% Leaderboard | −4.3 pts |
More in World models
- AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. GPT-5.4 58.3
- IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy.
Muse Spark Open 68.3%
- QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions.
Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
- VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems.
Gemini 3 Pro 91%
- ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics.
Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
- RBench Only in system cards 650 image+text prompts for robot video generation (tasks and embodiments). MLLM judge scores task completion, physical plausibility, stability.
Wan 2.6 60.7%