Benchmark Almanac

Real-World Finance v2 (Anthropic)

Claude Fable 5.2 1,637 leads since November 2026
Only in system cards

Agents complete 294 long-horizon finance tasks such as building financial models. A model grader compares deliverables pairwise and ratings are fit as Elo.

In-house Anthropic evaluation. Scores are Elo with Sonnet 4.6 fixed at 1000, so they do not compare with the first version.

Made by
Anthropic
Kind
Finance
Level
Expert
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
Claude Fable 5.2 #1 on the capability index
Last in a system card
November 2026
Last model added
November 2026
3
Models scored in lab cards
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Claude Fable 5.2 leads with 1,637

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Bars start at 1,200.

  1. 1 Claude Fable 5.2 1,637
  2. 2 Claude Fable 5 1,374
  3. 3 Claude Sonnet 5 1,219

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Fable 5.2 1,637 Nov 2026 Lab model card
2 Claude Fable 5 1,374 Jun 2026 Lab model card
3 Claude Sonnet 5 1,219 Jun 2026 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Lab claims 2 leaders

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 2026 2027 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 2026 2027

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Nov 9, 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 system card 1637 Real-World Finance v2 Elo, max effort, one attempt at each of 123 tasks. Opus 5.5 grader gaps divided by 2.61 and anchored to Fable 5 at 1374. Six unfinished tasks excluded from headline comparison (Section 8.14.6) Capabilities
Jun 30, 2026 Claude Sonnet 5 system card 1219 Real-World Finance v2 Elo, 294 tasks, pairwise Opus 4.8 grader, Sonnet 4.6 anchored at 1000 (8.11.2, Figure 8.11.2.A) Capabilities
Jun 9, 2026 Claude Fable 5 system card 1374 Real-World Finance v2 Elo, 294 tasks, 2,491 pairwise grades, Opus 4.8 grader, Sonnet 4.6 anchored at 1000, labeled Fable/Mythos 5; preferred over Opus 4.8 in 74% of comparisons (8.17.3.1, Figure 8.17.3.1.A) Capabilities

More in Law, finance and medicine

All 179 in Law, finance and medicine
  • MedXpertQA-MM In use Models answer expert-level medical exam questions that combine images with clinical records and test results. Scoring is accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 80.4%
  • HealthBench Professional In use 525 physician-authored tasks from real clinician chats (care consult, documentation, research) with physician-adjudicated rubrics. Claude Sonnet 5.5 69.2%
  • HealthBench In use 5,000 realistic health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics. A length-adjusted variant penalizes verbosity. GPT-5 67.2%
  • FinSearchComp In use Agents search the web to fetch live financial data, look up history, and run multi-step investigations, across 635 expert-written questions. Scored by answer accuracy. Ling-3.1-flash 81.7%
  • KBL In use Models answer Korean legal knowledge and reasoning tasks and Korean bar exam questions. It has 7 knowledge tasks, 4 reasoning tasks and 2,510 bar exam items. Solar Pro 4 77.5%
  • KorMedMCQA In use Models answer 7,469 multiple-choice questions from Korean licensing exams for doctors, nurses, pharmacists and dentists, held from 2012 to 2024. Solar Pro 4 93.2%