Benchmark Almanac

Real2Sim

Claude Opus 5.5 0.58 leads since November 2026
Not in model cards

Coding agents get a robot recording from DROID (three camera videos, stereo calibration, joint and gripper commands and the task instruction) and build an interactive simulation of the scene. Each scene is scored on how closely it matches the recording, on replaying the recorded actions, and on whether a fixed robot policy completes the task in it.

Ten DROID episodes, all recorded on one Franka Panda rig. Each model builds every scene twice, once with a plain prompt and once with the agent instructions from RoboSimStudio (arXiv 2610.18835). The score is the mean of four equally weighted parts: visual fidelity (1 minus LPIPS), semantic fidelity (DINOv2 cosine), replay of the recorded actions and success of the π0.5-DROID policy. One reviewer who knew the model and harness judged the replays. No policy rollout has succeeded so far, and the policy was not tested on a known-good scene, so a failure may come from the policy rather than the scene.

Released
November 2026
Kind
Simulated robots
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 14th, 2026
3
Models scored on its own leaderboard

Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 0.58

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 14th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

  1. 1 Claude Opus 5.5 0.58
  2. 2 Gemini 4 Argon 0.51
  3. 3 GPT-6 Astra 0.40

Source: Official Real2Sim leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 5.5 0.58 RoboSimStudio Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Gemini 4 Argon 0.51 RoboSimStudio Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-6 Astra 0.40 RoboSimStudio Sep 2026 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard 1 leader

Source: Official Real2Sim leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0.40 0.50 0.60 0.40 0.50 0.60

Source: Official Real2Sim leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Robotics

All 104 in Robotics
  • ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
  • RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
  • RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
  • Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
  • Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
  • Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds. Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%