Benchmark Almanac

RMBench

Mem-0 42% tops its leaderboard π0.5 10.4% leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Policies run 9 simulated bimanual manipulation tasks on RoboTwin 2.0 that need memory of earlier observations, at several levels of memory complexity. Success rate.

About 225 GitHub stars. Tasks split into single-memory M(1) and multi-memory M(n) groups. Evaluation can run through XPolicyLab adapters. The paper also proposes the Mem-0 policy.

Released
March 2026
Kind
Simulated robots
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Last model added
April 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Robotic manipulation policies have made rapid progress in recent years, yet most existing approaches give limited consideration to memory capabilities. Consequently, they struggle to solve tasks that require reasoning over historical observations and maintaining task-relevant information over time, which are common requirements in real-world manipulation scenarios. Although several memory-aware policies have been proposed, systematic evaluation of memory-dependent manipulation remains underexplored, and the relationship between architectural design choices and memory performance is still not well understood. To address this gap, we introduce RMBench, a simulation benchmark comprising 9 manipulation tasks that span multiple levels of memory complexity, enabling systematic evaluation of policy memory capabilities. We further propose Mem-0, a modular manipulation policy with explicit memory components designed to support controlled ablation studies. Through extensive simulation and real-world experiments, we identify memory-related limitations in existing policies and provide empirical insights into how architectural design choices influence memory performance. The website is available at https://rmbench.github.io/.

Abstract of RMBench: Memory-Dependent Robotic Manipulation Benchmark with Insights into Policy Design (arXiv:2603.01229, CC0)
8
Entries on its own leaderboard, 1 model we track

Mem-0 tops the leaderboard with 42%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is π0.5, at 10.4%.

  1. 1 Mem-0 42%
  2. 2 MemoryVLA 19.4%
  3. 3 π0.5 10.4%
  4. 4 X-VLA 9.80%
  5. 5 MemER 8.70%
  6. 6 ACT 5.90%
  7. 7 DP 5.80%
  8. 8 QwenOFT 5.70%

Source: Official RMBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Mem-0 42% Official leaderboard
2 MemoryVLA 19.4% Official leaderboard
3 π0.5 10.4% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
4 X-VLA 9.80% Official leaderboard
5 MemER 8.70% Official leaderboard
6 ACT 5.90% Official leaderboard
7 DP 5.80% Official leaderboard
8 QwenOFT 5.70% Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) π0.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) π0.5

Source: Official RMBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Robotics

All 104 in Robotics
  • ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
  • RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
  • RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
  • Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
  • Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
  • Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds. Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%