Benchmark Almanac

RoboEval

π0.5 40.5% leads
MolmoAct 2 44.3% leads
Fading

Robot policies perform eight bimanual manipulation tasks with controlled variations in simulation. Scores add behavior and progress metrics, such as coordination and efficiency, to task success.

The paper ships over three thousand expert demonstrations. Version 2 of the paper came out on May 4th, 2026. Ai2 reports a 0 to 1 score for MolmoAct 2.

Released
July 2025
Kind
Simulated robots
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
May 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
May 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce RoboEval, a structured evaluation framework and benchmark for robotic manipulation that augments binary success with principled behavioral and outcome metrics. Existing evaluations often collapse performance into outcome counts, masking differences in execution quality and obscuring failure structure. RoboEval provides eight bimanual tasks with systematically controlled variations, more than three thousand expert demonstrations, and a modular simulation platform for reproducible experimentation. All tasks are instrumented with standardized metrics that quantify efficiency, coordination, and safety/stability, as well as outcome measures that trace stagewise progress and localize failure modes. Through extensive experiments with state-of-the-art visuomotor policies, we validate these metrics by analyzing their stability under variation, discriminative power across policies with similar success rates, and correlation with task success. Project Page: https://robo-eval.github.io

Abstract of RoboEval: Where Robotic Manipulation Meets Structured and Scalable Evaluation (arXiv:2507.00435, CC0)
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

MolmoAct 2 leads with 44.3%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

π0.5 leads with 40.5% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

MolmoAct 2 leads with 44.3%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 MolmoAct 2 44.3%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Source: Official RoboEval leaderboard

Sources: Labs’ model cards and official RoboEval leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MolmoAct 2 44.3% May 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 π0.5 40.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MolmoAct 2 44.3% May 2026 Lab model card
2 π0.5 40.5% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 6 entries, 1 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MolmoAct 2 π0.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MolmoAct 2 π0.5

Sources: Official RoboEval leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in May 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Ai2
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
May 5, 2026 MolmoAct 2 0.443 RoboEval (0 to 1, higher is better)

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
May 4, 2026 MolmoAct 2 technical report 44.3 RoboEval success rate averaged over 8 bimanual tasks, fine-tuned (6.3 text and Figure 6) Capabilities

More in Robotics

All 103 in Robotics
  • ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
  • RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
  • RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
  • Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
  • Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
  • Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds. Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%