Benchmark Almanac

Robust IF Bench

In use

Models follow a diverse set of hard instructions from Microsoft AI's internal benchmark.

In-house: Microsoft AI never released the tasks or the scoring method.

Made by
Microsoft AI
Released
June 2026
Kind
Following precise instructions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Kept private
Last in a launch post
June 2026
Last model added
June 2026
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

MAI-Code-1-Flash leads with 61.2%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 MAI-Code-1-Flash 61.2%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MAI-Code-1-Flash 61.2% Jun 2026 Lab model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MAI-Code-1-Flash 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MAI-Code-1-Flash

Source: Labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Microsoft
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jun 2, 2026 MAI-Code-1-Flash 61.2 Robust IF Bench (internal diverse hard IF, average)

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 2, 2026 MAI-Code-1-Flash model card 61.2 Robust IF Bench, internal diverse hard IF, average (Instruction following table) Capabilities

More in Instructions and chat

All 81 in Instructions and chat
  • IFEval In use Models answer about 500 prompts containing verifiable instructions such as word limits or required keywords. Code checks each instruction for strict and loose accuracy. Gemma 4 31B IT 98.9%
  • IFBench In use 58 new out-of-domain verifiable output constraints. Scored by programmatic constraint checks (strict or loose). Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9%
  • MultiChallenge In use Multi-turn conversations testing instruction retention, inference memory, versioned editing and self-coherence. Graded by LLM judge with rubrics. GPT-6.1 Sol 82%
  • Multi-IF In use Models follow verifiable instructions over three-turn conversations in eight languages, extending IFEval. Scored by instruction accuracy at each turn. LFM3-1.7B 89.1%
  • AdvancedIF In use Models respond to over 1,600 prompts with complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. A judge model checks each response against expert-written rubrics. MAI-Thinking-1 85%
  • IFStruct In use Models generate JSON or YAML that must follow a requested schema and phrasing constraints, without constrained decoding. A response passes only if every structural constraint holds. Gemma 4 31B IT 95.9%