ScienceBoard
Computer-use agents do scientific workflows in desktop software such as ChimeraX, Celestia, GRASS GIS and Lean 4. The apps are modified to expose state for checking.
104 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.
- Released
- May 2025
- Kind
- Desktop apps
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5.6 Sol #13 on the capability index
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large Language Models (LLMs) have extended their impact beyond Natural Language Processing, substantially fostering the development of interdisciplinary research. Recently, various LLM-based agents have been developed to assist scientific discovery progress across multiple aspects and domains. Among these, computer-using agents, capable of interacting with operating systems as humans do, are paving the way to automated scientific problem-solving and addressing routines in researchers' workflows. Recognizing the transformative potential of these agents, we introduce ScienceBoard, which encompasses two complementary contributions: (i) a realistic, multi-domain environment featuring dynamic and visually rich scientific workflows with integrated professional software, where agents can autonomously interact via different interfaces to accelerate complex research tasks and experiments; and (ii) a challenging benchmark of 169 high-quality, rigorously validated real-world tasks curated by humans, spanning scientific-discovery workflows in domains such as biochemistry, astronomy, and geoinformatics. Extensive evaluations of agents with state-of-the-art backbones (e.g., GPT-4o, Claude 3.7, UI-TARS) show that, despite some promising results, they still fall short of reliably assisting scientists in complex workflows, achieving only a 15% overall success rate. In-depth analysis further provides valuable insights for addressing current agent limitations and more effective design principles, paving the way to build more capable agents for scientific discovery. Our code, environment, and benchmark are at https://qiushisun.github.io/ScienceBoard-Home/.
Claude Opus 4.8 leads with 68% among models released by August 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 14 more
- 68.0 Claude Opus 4.8
- 64.7 Qwen-CUA
- 42.6 GPT-5.6 Sol
- 42.0
Qwen 3.8 27B
- 36.2 Qwen-3.7
- 24.2 GPT-5
- 18.3 GPT-5.5
- 17.0 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 15.8 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 14.6 Claude Opus 4.6
- 14.4 GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
- 12.9
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 12.3 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified)
- 11.8
Gemini 3.1 Pro
- 10.8 o3-mini (2025-01-31)
- 9.81 Qwen3-VL-235B
- 7.76 Kimi K2.5
- 7.69 Qwen3.5-39B-A17B
- 7.04 gpt-oss-120b
- 6.51 Qwen3-VL-4B
- 6.51 Qwen3-VL-8B
- 5.92
Qwen3.5-27B
- 5.46
InternVL3-78B
- 2.69
UI-TARS-1.5
- 0.49
QVQ-72B-Preview
- 1 Claude Opus 4.8 screenshot 68%
- 2 Qwen-CUA screenshot 64.7%
- 3 GPT-5.6 Sol screenshot 42.6%
- 4
Qwen 3.8 27B screenshot 42%
- 5 Qwen-3.7 screenshot 36.2%
- 6 GPT-5 screenshot+a11y_tree 24.2%
- 7 GPT-5.5 screenshot 18.3%
- 8 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) screenshot+a11y_tree 17%
- 9 Claude 3.7 Sonnet screenshot+a11y_tree 15.8%
- 10 Claude Opus 4.6 screenshot 14.6%
- 11 GPT-4o (2024-08-06) screenshot+a11y_tree 14.4%
- 12
Qwen2.5-VL-72B screenshot 12.9%
- 13 Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) screenshot+a11y_tree 12.3%
- 14
Gemini 3.1 Pro screenshot 11.8%
- 15 o3-mini (2025-01-31) a11y_tree 10.8%
- 16 Qwen3-VL-235B screenshot 9.81%
- 17 Kimi K2.5 screenshot 7.76%
- 18 Qwen3.5-39B-A17B screenshot 7.69%
- 19 gpt-oss-120b a11y_tree 7.04%
- 20 Qwen3-VL-4B screenshot 6.51%
- 21 Qwen3-VL-8B screenshot 6.51%
- 22
Qwen3.5-27B screenshot 5.92%
- 23
InternVL3-78B screenshot 5.46%
- 24
UI-TARS-1.5 screenshot 2.69%
- 25
QVQ-72B-Preview set_of_marks 0.49%
Source: Official ScienceBoard leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 68% | screenshot, ScienceBoard harness | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Qwen-CUA | 64.7% | screenshot, ScienceBoard harness | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 42.6% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 42% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Qwen-3.7 | 36.2% | screenshot, ScienceBoard harness | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | GPT-5 | 24.2% | screenshot+a11y_tree, ScienceBoard baseline | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GPT-5.5 | 18.3% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 17% | screenshot+a11y_tree, ScienceBoard baseline | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 15.8% | screenshot+a11y_tree, ScienceBoard baseline | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 14.6% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) | 14.4% | screenshot+a11y_tree, ScienceBoard baseline | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 12.9% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Gemini-2.0-Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 12.3% | screenshot+a11y_tree, ScienceBoard baseline | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 11.8% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | o3-mini (2025-01-31) | 10.8% | a11y_tree, ScienceBoard baseline | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Qwen3-VL-235B | 9.81% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Kimi K2.5 | 7.76% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | Qwen3.5-39B-A17B | 7.69% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | gpt-oss-120b | 7.04% | a11y_tree, ScienceBoard baseline | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | Qwen3-VL-4B | 6.51% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | Qwen3-VL-8B | 6.51% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | | 5.92% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | | 5.46% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | | 2.69% | screenshot, ScienceBoard baseline | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | | 0.49% | set_of_marks, ScienceBoard baseline | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official ScienceBoard leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.8 | screenshot | ScienceBoard harness | 68% | ||
| GPT-5.6 Sol | screenshot | ScienceBoard baseline | 42.6% | ||
| | screenshot | ScienceBoard baseline | 42% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.8 | screenshot | ScienceBoard baseline | 27.8% | ||
| GPT-5 | screenshot+a11y_tree | ScienceBoard baseline | 24.2% | ||
| GPT-5.5 | screenshot | ScienceBoard baseline | 18.3% | ||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | screenshot+a11y_tree | ScienceBoard baseline | 15.8% | ||
| Claude Opus 4.6 | screenshot | ScienceBoard baseline | 14.6% | ||
| | screenshot | ScienceBoard baseline | 12.9% | ||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | a11y_tree | ScienceBoard baseline | 12.1% | ||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | set_of_marks | ScienceBoard baseline | 11.9% | ||
| | screenshot | ScienceBoard baseline | 11.8% | ||
| | screenshot+a11y_tree | ScienceBoard baseline | 11.7% | ||
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | screenshot | ScienceBoard baseline | 10.5% | ||
| GPT-5 | screenshot | ScienceBoard baseline | 9.20% | ||
| Kimi K2.5 | screenshot | ScienceBoard baseline | 7.76% | ||
| gpt-oss-120b | a11y_tree | ScienceBoard baseline | 7.04% | ||
| | set_of_marks | ScienceBoard baseline | 6.36% | ||
| | screenshot | ScienceBoard baseline | 5.92% | ||
| | screenshot | ScienceBoard baseline | 5.46% | ||
| | a11y_tree | ScienceBoard baseline | 4.33% | ||
| | screenshot+a11y_tree | ScienceBoard baseline | 3.20% | ||
| | screenshot | ScienceBoard baseline | 2.69% | ||
| | set_of_marks | ScienceBoard baseline | 2.18% | ||
| | a11y_tree | ScienceBoard baseline | 1.11% | ||
| | set_of_marks | ScienceBoard baseline | 0.49% |
3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in May 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official ScienceBoard leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official ScienceBoard leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Computer and browser use
- BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
- ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
- AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
- WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces.
Muse Spark 1.1 69%
- MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%