Spider2-V
Multimodal agents do data science and engineering workflows in real enterprise apps such as BigQuery, dbt and Airbyte, on a desktop computer. Execution-based checks score each task.
NeurIPS 2024 Datasets and Benchmarks. Built on OSWorld infrastructure. Different from the text-to-SQL Spider 2.0.
- Made by
- HKU XLANG Lab and collaborators
- Released
- July 2024
- Kind
- Desktop apps
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-4o May 2024 #161 on the capability index
- Last model added
- May 2024
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Data science and engineering workflows often span multiple stages, from warehousing to orchestration, using tools like BigQuery, dbt, and Airbyte. As vision language models (VLMs) advance in multimodal understanding and code generation, VLM-based agents could potentially automate these workflows by generating SQL queries, Python code, and GUI operations. This automation can improve the productivity of experts while democratizing access to large-scale data analysis. In this paper, we introduce Spider2-V, the first multimodal agent benchmark focusing on professional data science and engineering workflows, featuring 494 real-world tasks in authentic computer environments and incorporating 20 enterprise-level professional applications. These tasks, derived from real-world use cases, evaluate the ability of a multimodal agent to perform data-related tasks by writing code and managing the GUI in enterprise data software systems. To balance realistic simulation with evaluation simplicity, we devote significant effort to developing automatic configurations for task setup and carefully crafting evaluation metrics for each task. Furthermore, we supplement multimodal agents with comprehensive documents of these enterprise data software systems. Our empirical evaluation reveals that existing state-of-the-art LLM/VLM-based agents do not reliably automate full data workflows (14.0% success). Even with step-by-step guidance, these agents still underperform in tasks that require fine-grained, knowledge-intensive GUI actions (16.2%) and involve remote cloud-hosted workspaces (10.6%). We hope that Spider2-V paves the way for autonomous multimodal agents to transform the automation of data science and engineering workflow. Our code and data are available at https://spider2-v.github.io.
Learn-by-interact tops the leaderboard with 16.6%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-4 Turbo, at 14%.
The newest model with a score here came out in May 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Learn-by-interact SoM + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 200k 16.6%
- 2 GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023, SoM + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 128k 14%
- 3 GPT-4o May 2024, SoM + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 128k 13.8%
- 4 Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) SoM + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 128k 9.10%
- 5 Claude 3 Opus SoM + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 200k 8.10%
- 6
Llama 3-70B a11ytree + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 32k 2.00%
- 7
Mixtral 8x7B a11ytree + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 32k 0.80%
- 8 Qwen-Max a11ytree + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 32k 0.60%
Source: Official Spider2-V leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Learn-by-interact | 16.6% | SoM + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 200k | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-4 Turbo Nov 2023 | 14% | SoM + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 128k | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 13.8% | SoM + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 128k | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 9.10% | SoM + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 128k | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Claude 3 Opus | 8.10% | SoM + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 200k | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 2.00% | a11ytree + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 32k | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 0.80% | a11ytree + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 32k | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Qwen-Max | 0.60% | a11ytree + EF + RAG t=1.0, top-p=0.9 len = 32k | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Spider2-V leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official Spider2-V leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Computer and browser use
- BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
- ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
- AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
- WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces.
Muse Spark 1.1 69%
- MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%