Benchmark Almanac

SUNRGBD

Gemini Robotics-ER 48.3 leads since March 2025
Fading

Models detect objects in about 10,000 indoor RGB-D images and predict their 3D bounding boxes. Scored by average precision.

Released
June 2015
Kind
Detection and captioning
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B #77 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
March 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
March 2026
9
Models scored in lab cards
7
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab
3
System cards report it, from 3 labs

Gemini Robotics-ER leads with 48.3 among models released by February 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini Robotics-ER 48.3
  2. 2 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 38.3
  3. 3 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 36.2
  4. 4 Qwen3.5-27B 35.4
  5. 5 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 34.9
  6. 6 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 33.4
  7. 7 Seed1.5-VL 32.0
  8. 8 Qwen3.5-2B 28.7
  9. 9 Qwen3.5-0.8B 26.1

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini Robotics-ER 48.3 Mar 2025 Lab model card
2 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 38.3 Feb 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 36.2 Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 Qwen3.5-27B 35.4 Feb 2026 Lab model card
5 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 34.9 Sep 2025 Lab model card
6 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 33.4 Feb 2026 Lab model card
7 Seed1.5-VL 32.0 May 2025 Lab model card
8 Qwen3.5-2B 28.7 Mar 2026 Lab model card
9 Qwen3.5-0.8B 26.1 Mar 2026 Lab model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Lab claims Not tested since Mar 2026
Gemini Robotics-ER 48.3

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 2025 2026 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 2025 2026

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in March 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-0.8B 26.1 SUNRGBD 26.1/23.3 (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-2B 28.7 SUNRGBD 28.7/25.6 (with CI / without CI)
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 33.4 SUNRGBD
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-27B 35.4 SUNRGBD
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 36.2 SUNRGBD
Feb 16, 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 38.3 SUNRGBD
Sep 23, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 34.9 SUNRGBD

3 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Nov 26, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 34.9 SUNRGBD, 3D grounding (Table 2) Capabilities
May 11, 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 32 SUN-RGBD 3D detection AP@15, thinking, stated in 6.1.2 text. Non-thinking 33.5 Capabilities
Mar 25, 2025 Gemini Robotics-ER technical report 48.3 SUN-RGBD 3D object detection AP@15 (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%