Benchmark Almanac

TIR-Bench

Qwen 3.6 Plus 61.6% leads since April 2026
Fading

Models solve 13 kinds of image tasks that need tool use on images, such as rotation, jigsaw, and maze. Most items are multiple choice.

Qwen cards list two numbers for it, and the cards do not say which setting each one uses.

Released
November 2025
Kind
General visual questions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen 3.6 Plus #74 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
April 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
April 2026

In the authors’ words

The frontier of visual reasoning is shifting toward models like OpenAI o3, which can intelligently create and operate tools to transform images for problem-solving, also known as thinking-with-images in chain-of-thought. Yet existing benchmarks fail to fully capture this advanced capability. Even Visual Search, the most common benchmark for current thinking-with-images methods, tests only basic operations such as localization and cropping, offering little insight into more complex, dynamic, and tool-dependent reasoning. We introduce TIR-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating agentic thinking-with-images across 13 diverse tasks, each requiring novel tool use for image processing and manipulation in chain-of-thought. We evaluate 22 multimodal large language models (MLLMs), from leading open-sourced and proprietary models to those with explicit tool-use augmentation. Results show that TIR-Bench is universally challenging, and strong performance requires genuine thinking-with-images capabilities. Finally, we present a pilot study comparing direct versus agentic fine-tuning.

Abstract of TIR-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Agentic Thinking-with-Images Reasoning (arXiv:2511.01833, CC0)
6
Models scored in lab cards
6
Launch posts list it, from 1 lab

Qwen 3.6 Plus leads with 61.6% among models released by March 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in March 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen 3.6 Plus 61.6%
  2. 2 Qwen3.5-27B 59.8%
  3. 3 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 55.5%
  4. 4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 53.2%
  5. 5 Qwen3.5-9B 45.6%
  6. 6 Qwen3.5-4B 38.9%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.6 Plus 61.6% Apr 2026 Lab model card
2 Qwen3.5-27B 59.8% Feb 2026 Lab model card
3 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 55.5% Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 53.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
5 Qwen3.5-9B 45.6% Mar 2026 Lab model card
6 Qwen3.5-4B 38.9% Mar 2026 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in November 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen
Lab claims Not tested since Apr 2026

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.6 Plus Qwen3.5-27B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.6 Plus

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Apr 2, 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 61.6 TIR-Bench (61.6 / 43.7)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-4B 38.9 TIR-Bench 38.9/29.9 (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-9B 45.6 TIR-Bench 45.6/31.9 (with CI / without CI)
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 55.5 TIR-Bench 55.5 / 38.0 (with CI / without CI)
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-27B 59.8 TIR-Bench 59.8 / 42.3 (with CI / without CI)
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 53.2 TIR-Bench 53.2 / 42.5 (with CI / without CI)

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%