Benchmark Almanac

UGMathBench

o4-mini 81.9% leads since April 2025
o4-mini 81.9% leads since April 2025
Only in system cards

Models solve 5,062 undergraduate math problems across 16 subjects. Each problem has three randomized versions, and effective accuracy counts problems solved in all versions.

The paper was accepted to ICLR 2025. The authors plan more randomized versions as models saturate it. Ant Group reports it in the Ring-1T technical report.

Released
January 2025
Kind
Word problems
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
o4-mini #94 on the capability index
Last in a system card
October 2025
Last model added
October 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides in mathematical reasoning, underscoring the need for a comprehensive and fair evaluation of their capabilities. However, existing benchmarks often fall short, either lacking extensive coverage of undergraduate-level mathematical problems or probably suffering from test-set contamination. To address these issues, we introduce UGMathBench, a diverse and dynamic benchmark specifically designed for evaluating undergraduate-level mathematical reasoning with LLMs. UGMathBench comprises 5,062 problems across 16 subjects and 111 topics, featuring 10 distinct answer types. Each problem includes three randomized versions, with additional versions planned for release as leading open-source LLMs become saturated in UGMathBench. Furthermore, we propose two key metrics: effective accuracy (EAcc), which measures the percentage of correctly solved problems across all three versions, and reasoning gap (Δ), which assesses reasoning robustness by calculating the difference between the average accuracy across all versions and EAcc. Our extensive evaluation of 23 leading LLMs reveals that the highest EAcc achieved is 56.3% by OpenAI-o1-mini, with large Δ values observed across different models. This highlights the need for future research aimed at developing "large reasoning models" with high EAcc and Δ= 0. We anticipate that the release of UGMathBench, along with its detailed evaluation codes, will serve as a valuable resource to advance the development of LLMs in solving mathematical problems. Codes and data are available at https://github.com/YangLabHKUST/UGMathBench

Abstract of UGMathBench: A Diverse and Dynamic Benchmark for Undergraduate-Level Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models (arXiv:2501.13766, CC0)
8
Entries on its own leaderboard, 7 models we track
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

o4-mini leads with 81.9% among models released by April 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

o4-mini leads with 81.9%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 o4-mini medium 81.9%
  2. 2 Qwen3-235B-A22B thinking 81.8%
  3. 3 Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 80.6%
  4. 4 o3-mini medium 79%
  5. 5 Qwen3-32B thinking 78.5%
  6. 6 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 73.7%
  7. 7 GPT-4o Aug 2024 62.8%
  8. 8 GPT-4o mini (snapshot unspecified) 58.3%

Source: Official UGMathBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 o4-mini 81.9% medium Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen3-235B-A22B 81.8% thinking Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 80.6% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
4 o3-mini 79% medium Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3-32B 78.5% thinking Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 73.7% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-4o Aug 2024 62.8% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-4o mini (snapshot unspecified) 58.3% May 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 o4-mini 81.9% medium Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen3-235B-A22B 81.8% thinking Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 2.5 Pro Mar 2025 80.6% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
4 o3-mini 79% medium Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3-32B 78.5% thinking Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Ring-1T 76.5% Oct 2025 Lab model card
7 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 73.7% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-4o Aug 2024 62.8% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

4 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in January 2025 4 models have held number one with claims included since its release in January 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2025
o4-mini 81.9%

Source: Official UGMathBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) o4-mini GPT-4o 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) o4-mini GPT-4o

Sources: Official UGMathBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 21, 2025 Ring-1T technical report 76.5 UGMathBench (Table 1) Capabilities

More in Math

All 113 in Math
  • AIME 2026 In use Models solve the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2026 AIME I and II math competitions. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 100%
  • IMO-AnswerBench In use 400 olympiad problems with short verifiable answers, robustified against memorization. Scored by answer match. GLM-5.2 91%
  • HMMT 2026 In use Models solve the 33 final-answer problems from the February 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 98.5%
  • PolyMath In use Models solve 9,000 parallel math problems in 18 languages across four difficulty levels, from school math to frontier math. Final answers are checked. Qwen3.7-Max 86.5%
  • MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) In use Evaluates models on newly released math competitions after release. Final-answer or human/LLM-judged proof scores. Claude Opus 4.8 81.3%
  • MathArena Apex Shortlist In use Models solve 47 hard final-answer problems that MathArena selected from 2025 competitions, where the best models scored about 50% at selection. Scored by accuracy over repeated attempts. GPT-5.5 98.4%