Ring-1T
Ring-1T ranks first on CNMO 2024.
29
Benchmarks with a score
1
Ranked first, out of five or more models
5
In the top three
Ring-1T
Open weights Flagship
141.3
#167 of 404
Self-Reported Index, from the lab's own numbers. No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet.
- BBEH micro average 59.6% #4 /15
- HealthBench 57.9% #18 /31
- PHYBench 42.6% #3 /5
Where it ranks
Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.
Knowledge and language
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGIEval | 88.1% | #3 of 40 | Lab model card | |
| Arena-Hard v2.0 | 81.6% | #4 of 24 | Lab model card | |
| Creative Writing v3 | 85.4 | #3 of 12 | Lab model card | |
| C-Eval | 91.5% | #12 of 46 | Lab model card | |
| BBEH micro average | 59.6% | #4 of 15 | Lab model card | |
| ConStory-Bench | 0.54 | #5 of 14 | Official leaderboard | |
| MMLU-Pro | 80.5% | #76 of 167 | Lab model card | |
| CMMLU | 89.1% | #8 of 17 | Lab model card | |
| TriviaQA | 78.6% | #21 of 40 | Lab model card | |
| IFEval | 85.2% | #79 of 135 | Lab model card | |
| MultiChallenge | 50.9% | #31 of 42 | Lab model card | |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 16% | #121 of 154 | Lab model card |
Math and science
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNMO 2024 | 88.5% | #1 of 7 | Lab model card | |
| ZebraLogic | 95.2% | #4 of 23 | Lab model card | |
| AIME 2025 | 93.4% | #30 of 143 | Lab model card | |
| Omni-MATH | 82.6% | #1 of 4 | Lab model card | |
| GPQA Diamond | 78.6% | #128 of 302 | Lab model card | |
| HMMT 2025 | 86.7% | #28 of 54 | Lab model card | |
| PHYBench | 42.6% | #3 of 5 | Lab model card | |
| ARC-AGI | 55.9% | #16 of 21 | Lab model card | |
| UGMathBench | 76.5% | #1 of 1 | Lab model card |
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aider-Edit | 78.6% | #2 of 5 | Lab model card | |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 78.3% | #37 of 90 | Lab model card | |
| Codeforces rating | 2,088 | #21 of 47 | Lab model card | |
| ICPC World Finals 2025 | 5.00 | #3 of 3 | Lab model card |
Agents and tools
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 68.8% | #21 of 41 | Lab model card | |
| SnakeBench | 16 | #168 of 188 | Official leaderboard |
Professional work
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HealthBench | 57.9% | #18 of 31 | Lab model card | |
| FinanceReasoning | 87.4% | #1 of 1 | Lab model card |
Its lab's numbers put it at 141.3, number 167 of 404
The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 18 capability results Ant Group reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 138.7 to 143.9. How we compute it.
- ZebraLogic 95.2
- AIME 2025 93.4
- C-Eval 91.5
- CMMLU 89.1
- AGIEval 88.1
- HMMT 2025 86.7
- IFEval 85.2
- Arena-Hard v2.0 81.6
- MMLU-Pro 80.5
- GPQA Diamond 78.6
- TriviaQA 78.6
- LiveCodeBench v6 78.3
- Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) 68.8
- BBEH micro average 59.6
- HealthBench 57.9
- ARC-AGI 55.9
- MultiChallenge 50.9
- Humanity's Last Exam 16
Its launch post
The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.
Its system card
Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 19 of them aren't in the launch post.
Capabilities
- AIME 2025 93.4
- Omni-MATH 82.6
- HMMT 2025 86.7
- CNMO 2024 88.5
- FinanceReasoning 87.4
- UGMathBench 76.5
- LiveCodeBench v6 78.3
- Codeforces rating 2088
- Aider-Edit 78.6
- ARC-AGI 55.9
- BBEH micro average 59.6
- ZebraLogic 95.2
- Humanity's Last Exam 16
- GPQA Diamond 78.6
- MMLU-Pro 80.5
- C-Eval 91.5
- PHYBench 42.6
- AGIEval 88.1
- TriviaQA 78.6
- CMMLU 89.1
- Arena-Hard v2.0 81.6
- Creative Writing v3 85.4
- IFEval 85.2
- MultiChallenge 50.9
- Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) 68.8
- IMO 2025
Health
- HealthBench 57.9