VisualAgentBench
Large multimodal models act as agents in embodied, GUI and visual design environments, including mobile, WebArena-based web and Minecraft tasks.
ICLR 2025. 279 GitHub stars at November 1st, 2026.
- Made by
- Tsinghua University and Zhipu AI (THUDM)
- Released
- August 2024
- Kind
- Web browsing
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-4o May 2024 #161 on the capability index
- Last model added
- July 2024
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have ushered in a new era in artificial intelligence, merging capabilities in both language and vision to form highly capable Visual Foundation Agents. These agents are postulated to excel across a myriad of tasks, potentially approaching general artificial intelligence. However, existing benchmarks fail to sufficiently challenge or showcase the full potential of LMMs in complex, real-world environments. To address this gap, we introduce VisualAgentBench (VAB), a comprehensive and pioneering benchmark specifically designed to train and evaluate LMMs as visual foundation agents across diverse scenarios, including Embodied, Graphical User Interface, and Visual Design, with tasks formulated to probe the depth of LMMs' understanding and interaction capabilities. Through rigorous testing across nine proprietary LMM APIs and eight open models, we demonstrate the considerable yet still developing agent capabilities of these models. Additionally, VAB constructs a trajectory training set constructed through hybrid methods including Program-based Solvers, LMM Agent Bootstrapping, and Human Demonstrations, promoting substantial performance improvements in LMMs through behavior cloning. Our work not only aims to benchmark existing models but also provides a solid foundation for future development into visual foundation agents. Code, train & test data, and part of fine-tuned open LMMs are available at https://github.com/THUDM/VisualAgentBench.
GPT-4o leads with 36.2% among models released by July 2024
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 36.2 GPT-4o
- 31.7 gpt-4-vision-preview
- 29.9 gpt-4-turbo-0409
- 26.9 claude-3.5-sonnet (snapshot unspecified)
- 21.9 Claude 3 Opus
- 20.5 GPT-4o mini
- 19.8 gemini-1.5-pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 16.0 InternVL-2 (VAB fine-tuned, 7 B + 0.3 B)
- 12.0 GLM-4V (VAB fine-tuned, 9 B + 4 B)
- 10.5 LLaVA-NeXT (VAB fine-tuned, 8 B + 0.3 B)
- 10.3 CogVLM2 (VAB fine-tuned, 8 B + 12 B)
- 8.90 CogAgent (VAB fine-tuned, 7 B + 11 B)
- 8.40 CogVLM (VAB fine-tuned, 7 B + 10 B)
- 7.70 LLaVA-1.5 (VAB fine-tuned, 13 B + 1 B)
- 6.30
Gemini 1.0 Pro
- 5.70 Qwen-VL (VAB fine-tuned, 7 B + 2 B)
- 2.70 Qwen-VL-Max
- 1 GPT-4o May 2024 36.2%
- 2 gpt-4-vision-preview 31.7%
- 3 gpt-4-turbo-0409 29.9%
- 4 claude-3.5-sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 26.9%
- 5 Claude 3 Opus 21.9%
- 6 GPT-4o mini 20.5%
- 7 gemini-1.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) 19.8%
- 8 InternVL-2 (VAB fine-tuned, 7 B + 0.3 B) 16%
- 9 GLM-4V (VAB fine-tuned, 9 B + 4 B) 12%
- 10 LLaVA-NeXT (VAB fine-tuned, 8 B + 0.3 B) 10.5%
- 11 CogVLM2 (VAB fine-tuned, 8 B + 12 B) 10.3%
- 12 CogAgent (VAB fine-tuned, 7 B + 11 B) 8.90%
- 13 CogVLM (VAB fine-tuned, 7 B + 10 B) 8.40%
- 14 LLaVA-1.5 (VAB fine-tuned, 13 B + 1 B) 7.70%
- 15
Gemini 1.0 Pro 6.30%
- 16 Qwen-VL (VAB fine-tuned, 7 B + 2 B) 5.70%
- 17 Qwen-VL-Max 2.70%
Source: Official VisualAgentBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 36.2% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | gpt-4-vision-preview | 31.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | gpt-4-turbo-0409 | 29.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | claude-3.5-sonnet (snapshot unspecified) | 26.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Claude 3 Opus | 21.9% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | GPT-4o mini | 20.5% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | gemini-1.5-pro (snapshot unspecified) | 19.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | InternVL-2 (VAB fine-tuned, 7 B + 0.3 B) | 16% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | GLM-4V (VAB fine-tuned, 9 B + 4 B) | 12% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | LLaVA-NeXT (VAB fine-tuned, 8 B + 0.3 B) | 10.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | CogVLM2 (VAB fine-tuned, 8 B + 12 B) | 10.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | CogAgent (VAB fine-tuned, 7 B + 11 B) | 8.90% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | CogVLM (VAB fine-tuned, 7 B + 10 B) | 8.40% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | LLaVA-1.5 (VAB fine-tuned, 13 B + 1 B) | 7.70% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | | 6.30% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Qwen-VL (VAB fine-tuned, 7 B + 2 B) | 5.70% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | Qwen-VL-Max | 2.70% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official VisualAgentBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official VisualAgentBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Computer and browser use
- BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
- ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
- AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
- WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces.
Muse Spark 1.1 69%
- MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%