VisualWebArena
Multimodal web agents complete 910 visually grounded tasks on self-hosted classifieds, shopping and Reddit-style sites. Execution-based checks score each task.
Built on the WebArena environments by the same group. Many 2024 and 2025 agent papers report it.
- Made by
- Carnegie Mellon University
- Released
- January 2024
- Kind
- Web browsing
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Llama 3-70B #181 on the capability index
- Last model added
- April 2024
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Autonomous agents capable of planning, reasoning, and executing actions on the web offer a promising avenue for automating computer tasks. However, the majority of existing benchmarks primarily focus on text-based agents, neglecting many natural tasks that require visual information to effectively solve. Given that most computer interfaces cater to human perception, visual information often augments textual data in ways that text-only models struggle to harness effectively. To bridge this gap, we introduce VisualWebArena, a benchmark designed to assess the performance of multimodal web agents on realistic visually grounded tasks. VisualWebArena comprises of a set of diverse and complex web-based tasks that evaluate various capabilities of autonomous multimodal agents. To perform on this benchmark, agents need to accurately process image-text inputs, interpret natural language instructions, and execute actions on websites to accomplish user-defined objectives. We conduct an extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLM-based autonomous agents, including several multimodal models. Through extensive quantitative and qualitative analysis, we identify several limitations of text-only LLM agents, and reveal gaps in the capabilities of state-of-the-art multimodal language agents. VisualWebArena provides a framework for evaluating multimodal autonomous language agents, and offers insights towards building stronger autonomous agents for the web. Our code, baseline models, and data is publicly available at https://jykoh.com/vwa.
GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 19.8%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-4V, at 16.4%.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM 19.8%
- 2 GPT-4V Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM 16.4%
- 3 GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) Caption-augmented; Accessibility Tree + Captions 12.8%
- 4 Gemini-Pro-1.5 Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM 12%
- 5
Llama 3-70B Caption-augmented; Accessibility Tree + Captions 9.78%
- 6 Gemini-Flash-1.5 Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM 6.59%
- 7
Gemini 1.0 Pro Multimodal; Image + Captions + Accessibility Tree 6.04%
- 8 GPT-3.5 (snapshot unspecified) Caption-augmented; Accessibility Tree + Captions 2.97%
- 9
Mixtral 8x7B Caption-augmented; Accessibility Tree + Captions 1.87%
- 10
Llama 2-70B Text-only; Accessibility Tree 1.10%
- 11
IDEFICS-80B-Instruct Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM 0.99%
- 12 CogVLM-17B-Chat Multimodal; Image + Captions + Accessibility Tree 0.33%
Source: Official VisualWebArena leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 19.8% | Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-4V | 16.4% | Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) | 12.8% | Caption-augmented; Accessibility Tree + Captions, Visual backbone: BLIP-2-T5XL | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Gemini-Pro-1.5 | 12% | Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 9.78% | Caption-augmented; Accessibility Tree + Captions, Visual backbone: BLIP-2-T5XL | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Gemini-Flash-1.5 | 6.59% | Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 6.04% | Multimodal; Image + Captions + Accessibility Tree | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | GPT-3.5 (snapshot unspecified) | 2.97% | Caption-augmented; Accessibility Tree + Captions, Visual backbone: BLIP-2-T5XL | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 1.87% | Caption-augmented; Accessibility Tree + Captions, Visual backbone: BLIP-2-T5XL | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 1.10% | Text-only; Accessibility Tree | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 0.99% | Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | CogVLM-17B-Chat | 0.33% | Multimodal; Image + Captions + Accessibility Tree | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard |
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official VisualWebArena leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4V | Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM | 16.4% | |||
| GPT-4V | Multimodal; Image + Captions + Accessibility Tree | 15.1% | |||
| | Caption-augmented; Accessibility Tree + Captions | Visual backbone: BLIP-2-T5XL | 9.78% | ||
| | Multimodal; Image + Captions + Accessibility Tree | 6.04% | |||
| | Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM | 5.71% | |||
| | Caption-augmented; Accessibility Tree + Captions | Visual backbone: BLIP-2-T5XL | 3.85% | ||
| | Text-only; Accessibility Tree | 2.20% | |||
| | Caption-augmented; Accessibility Tree + Captions | Visual backbone: BLIP-2-T5XL | 1.87% | ||
| | Text-only; Accessibility Tree | 1.76% | |||
| | Text-only; Accessibility Tree | 1.10% | |||
| | Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM | 0.99% | |||
| | Multimodal; Image + Captions + Accessibility Tree | 0.77% | |||
| | Caption-augmented; Accessibility Tree + Captions | Visual backbone: BLIP-2-T5XL | 0.66% | ||
| CogVLM-17B-Chat | Multimodal; Image + Captions + Accessibility Tree | 0.33% | |||
| CogVLM-17B-Chat | Multimodal (SoM); Image + Captions + SoM | 0.33% |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official VisualWebArena leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official VisualWebArena leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Computer and browser use
- BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
- ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
- AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
- WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces.
Muse Spark 1.1 69%
- MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%