VisualWebBench
Models answer questions about web page screenshots across seven tasks, such as captioning, OCR, element grounding and action prediction.
- Made by
- Junpeng Liu, Yifan Song et al.
- Released
- April 2024
- Kind
- Finding things on screen
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Last in a launch post
- October 2025, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- October 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Multimodal Large Language models (MLLMs) have shown promise in web-related tasks, but evaluating their performance in the web domain remains a challenge due to the lack of comprehensive benchmarks. Existing benchmarks are either designed for general multimodal tasks, failing to capture the unique characteristics of web pages, or focus on end-to-end web agent tasks, unable to measure fine-grained abilities such as OCR, understanding, and grounding. In this paper, we introduce \bench, a multimodal benchmark designed to assess the capabilities of MLLMs across a variety of web tasks. \bench consists of seven tasks, and comprises 1.5K human-curated instances from 139 real websites, covering 87 sub-domains. We evaluate 14 open-source MLLMs, Gemini Pro, Claude-3 series, and GPT-4V(ision) on \bench, revealing significant challenges and performance gaps. Further analysis highlights the limitations of current MLLMs, including inadequate grounding in text-rich environments and subpar performance with low-resolution image inputs. We believe \bench will serve as a valuable resource for the research community and contribute to the creation of more powerful and versatile MLLMs for web-related applications.
Claude Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 65.8%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Gemini 1.0 Pro, at 48%.
Seed1.5-VL leads with 87.3%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in March 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 65.8 Claude Sonnet (snapshot unspecified)
- 64.6 GPT-4V(ision)
- 58.5 Claude Opus (snapshot unspecified)
- 50.5 LLaVA-1.6-34B
- 48.0
Gemini 1.0 Pro
- 39.4 LLaVA-1.6-13B
- 36.0 LLaVA-1.6-7B
- 28.7 CogAgent-Chat
- 28.1
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat
- 27.3 VILA-13B
- 25.1 CogVLM-17B-Chat
- 23.9 Qwen-VL
- 19.4 SPHINX
- 19.4
LLaVA-v1.5-13B
- 18.6
mPLUG-Owl2
- 17.0 LLaVA-1.5-7B
- 16.2
Yi-VL-6B
- 11.2 BLIP-2
- 10.7 Fuyu-8B
- 10.1 InstructBLIP-13B
- 9.70 SeeClick
- 3.60 Otter
- 1 Claude Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 65.8%
- 2 GPT-4V(ision) 64.6%
- 3 Claude Opus (snapshot unspecified) 58.5%
- 4 LLaVA-1.6-34B 50.5%
- 5
Gemini 1.0 Pro 48%
- 6 LLaVA-1.6-13B 39.4%
- 7 LLaVA-1.6-7B 36%
- 8 CogAgent-Chat 28.7%
- 9
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 28.1%
- 10 VILA-13B 27.3%
- 11 CogVLM-17B-Chat 25.1%
- 12 Qwen-VL 23.9%
- 13 SPHINX 19.4%
- 14
LLaVA-v1.5-13B 19.4%
- 15
mPLUG-Owl2 18.6%
- 16 LLaVA-1.5-7B 17%
- 17
Yi-VL-6B 16.2%
- 18 BLIP-2 11.2%
- 19 Fuyu-8B 10.7%
- 20 InstructBLIP-13B 10.1%
- 21 SeeClick 9.70%
- 22 Otter 3.60%
Source: Official VisualWebBench leaderboard
- 1
Seed1.5-VL 87.3%
- 2
LongCat-Flash-Omni 78.7%
- 3
Gemini 1.0 Pro 48%
- 4
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 28.1%
- 5 CogVLM-17B-Chat 25.1%
- 6
LLaVA-v1.5-13B 19.4%
- 7
mPLUG-Owl2 18.6%
- 8
Yi-VL-6B 16.2%
- 9 Fuyu-8B 10.7%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official VisualWebBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) | 65.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | GPT-4V(ision) | 64.6% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | Claude Opus (snapshot unspecified) | 58.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | LLaVA-1.6-34B | 50.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | | 48% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | LLaVA-1.6-13B | 39.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | LLaVA-1.6-7B | 36% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | CogAgent-Chat | 28.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | | 28.1% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | VILA-13B | 27.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | CogVLM-17B-Chat | 25.1% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Qwen-VL | 23.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | SPHINX | 19.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | | 19.4% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 18.6% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | LLaVA-1.5-7B | 17% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | | 16.2% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | BLIP-2 | 11.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 19 | Fuyu-8B | 10.7% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | InstructBLIP-13B | 10.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | SeeClick | 9.70% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 22 | Otter | 3.60% | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 87.3% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 78.7% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 48% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 28.1% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | CogVLM-17B-Chat | 25.1% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 19.4% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 18.6% | Nov 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 16.2% | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Fuyu-8B | 10.7% | Oct 2023 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official VisualWebBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
ByteDance Seed’s own number for Seed1.5-VL passed 85% in May 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official VisualWebBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs dropped it from launch posts once the best score passed 85%
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2025 | 78.7 | VisualWebBench | |
| May 12, 2025 | 87.3 | VisualWebBench |
2 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2025 | | 78.7 | VisualWebBench (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 87.3 | VisualWebBench, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 88.0 | Capabilities |
More in Computer and browser use
- BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
- ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
- AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
- WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces.
Muse Spark 1.1 69%
- MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%