Benchmark Almanac

VisualWebBench

Claude Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 65.8% tops its leaderboard Gemini 1.0 Pro 48% leads the models we track
Seed1.5-VL 87.3% leads since May 2025
Dropped

Models answer questions about web page screenshots across seven tasks, such as captioning, OCR, element grounding and action prediction.

Released
April 2024
Kind
Finding things on screen
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
October 2025, dropped after it saturated
Last model added
October 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Multimodal Large Language models (MLLMs) have shown promise in web-related tasks, but evaluating their performance in the web domain remains a challenge due to the lack of comprehensive benchmarks. Existing benchmarks are either designed for general multimodal tasks, failing to capture the unique characteristics of web pages, or focus on end-to-end web agent tasks, unable to measure fine-grained abilities such as OCR, understanding, and grounding. In this paper, we introduce \bench, a multimodal benchmark designed to assess the capabilities of MLLMs across a variety of web tasks. \bench consists of seven tasks, and comprises 1.5K human-curated instances from 139 real websites, covering 87 sub-domains. We evaluate 14 open-source MLLMs, Gemini Pro, Claude-3 series, and GPT-4V(ision) on \bench, revealing significant challenges and performance gaps. Further analysis highlights the limitations of current MLLMs, including inadequate grounding in text-rich environments and subpar performance with low-resolution image inputs. We believe \bench will serve as a valuable resource for the research community and contribute to the creation of more powerful and versatile MLLMs for web-related applications.

Abstract of VisualWebBench: How Far Have Multimodal LLMs Evolved in Web Page Understanding and Grounding? (arXiv:2404.05955, CC0)
22
Entries on its own leaderboard, 7 models we track
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
2
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Claude Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 65.8%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Gemini 1.0 Pro, at 48%.

Seed1.5-VL leads with 87.3%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in March 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 65.8%
  2. 2 GPT-4V(ision) 64.6%
  3. 3 Claude Opus (snapshot unspecified) 58.5%
  4. 4 LLaVA-1.6-34B 50.5%
  5. 5 Gemini 1.0 Pro 48%
  6. 6 LLaVA-1.6-13B 39.4%
  7. 7 LLaVA-1.6-7B 36%
  8. 8 CogAgent-Chat 28.7%
  9. 9 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 28.1%
  10. 10 VILA-13B 27.3%
  11. 11 CogVLM-17B-Chat 25.1%
  12. 12 Qwen-VL 23.9%
  13. 13 SPHINX 19.4%
  14. 14 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 19.4%
  15. 15 mPLUG-Owl2 18.6%
  16. 16 LLaVA-1.5-7B 17%
  17. 17 Yi-VL-6B 16.2%
  18. 18 BLIP-2 11.2%
  19. 19 Fuyu-8B 10.7%
  20. 20 InstructBLIP-13B 10.1%
  21. 21 SeeClick 9.70%
  22. 22 Otter 3.60%

Source: Official VisualWebBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 65.8% Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4V(ision) 64.6% Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus (snapshot unspecified) 58.5% Official leaderboard
4 LLaVA-1.6-34B 50.5% Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 1.0 Pro 48% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
6 LLaVA-1.6-13B 39.4% Official leaderboard
7 LLaVA-1.6-7B 36% Official leaderboard
8 CogAgent-Chat 28.7% Official leaderboard
9 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 28.1% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
10 VILA-13B 27.3% Official leaderboard
11 CogVLM-17B-Chat 25.1% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen-VL 23.9% Official leaderboard
13 SPHINX 19.4% Official leaderboard
14 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 19.4% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
15 mPLUG-Owl2 18.6% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
16 LLaVA-1.5-7B 17% Official leaderboard
17 Yi-VL-6B 16.2% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
18 BLIP-2 11.2% Official leaderboard
19 Fuyu-8B 10.7% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
20 InstructBLIP-13B 10.1% Official leaderboard
21 SeeClick 9.70% Official leaderboard
22 Otter 3.60% Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed1.5-VL 87.3% May 2025 Lab model card
2 LongCat-Flash-Omni 78.7% Oct 2025 Lab model card
3 Gemini 1.0 Pro 48% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
4 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 28.1% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
5 CogVLM-17B-Chat 25.1% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
6 LLaVA-v1.5-13B 19.4% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard
7 mPLUG-Owl2 18.6% Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
8 Yi-VL-6B 16.2% Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
9 Fuyu-8B 10.7% Oct 2023 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind ByteDance Seed
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2024
Lab claims Passed 85% in May 2025, by Seed1.5-VL
Seed1.5-VL 87.3%

Sources: Official VisualWebBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

ByteDance Seed’s own number for Seed1.5-VL passed 85% in May 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.5-VL Gemini 1.0 Pro CogVLM-17B-Chat LLaVA-v1.5-13B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.5-VL Gemini 1.0 Pro

Sources: Official VisualWebBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs dropped it from launch posts once the best score passed 85%

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Meituan
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni 78.7 VisualWebBench
May 12, 2025 Seed1.5-VL 87.3 VisualWebBench

2 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 31, 2025 LongCat-Flash-Omni technical report 78.7 VisualWebBench (Table 5) Capabilities
May 11, 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 87.3 VisualWebBench, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 88.0 Capabilities

More in Computer and browser use

All 69 in Computer and browser use
  • BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
  • ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
  • AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
  • WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces. Muse Spark 1.1 69%
  • MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%