ViVerBench
Models judge whether visual outcomes in multimodal reasoning are correct, across 16 task categories such as boxes, points, counts, mazes, GUIs, charts and LaTeX.
Scoring is rule-based, with an optional GPT-4.1 judge. The project page lists humans at 93.2 and random choice at 50.
- Made by
- Tsinghua University and ByteDance Seed
- Released
- October 2025
- Kind
- General visual questions
- Level
- School
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last in a system card
- February 2026
- Last model added
- February 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We introduce Generative Universal Verifier, a novel concept and plugin designed for next-generation multimodal reasoning in vision-language models and unified multimodal models, providing the fundamental capability of reflection and refinement on visual outcomes during the reasoning and generation process. This work makes three main contributions: (1) We build ViVerBench, a comprehensive benchmark spanning 16 categories of critical tasks for evaluating visual outcomes in multimodal reasoning. Results show that existing VLMs consistently underperform across these tasks, underscoring a substantial gap from human-level capability in reliable visual verification. (2) We design two automated pipelines to construct large-scale visual verification data and train OmniVerifier-7B, the first omni-capable generative verifier trained for universal visual verification and achieves notable gains on ViVerBench(+8.3). Through training, we identify three atomic capabilities in visual verification and demonstrate how they generalize and interact synergistically. (3) We propose OmniVerifier-TTS, a sequential test-time scaling paradigm that leverages the universal verifier to bridge image generation and editing within unified models, enhancing the upper bound of generative ability through iterative fine-grained optimization. Beyond generation, we extend universal verifier to broader world-modeling interleaved reasoning scenarios. Empirically, OmniVerifier-TTS achieves improvements on T2I-ReasonBench(+3.7), and GenEval++(+4.3), outperforming existing parallel test-time scaling methods, such as Best-of-N. By endowing multimodal reasoning with reliable visual verification, OmniVerifier advances both reliable reflection during generation and scalable test-time refinement, marking a step toward more trustworthy and controllable next-generation reasoning systems.
Gemini 2.5 Pro [snapshot unspecified] tops the leaderboard with 74.5%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-5, at 74.4%.
Seed2.0 Pro leads with 75.9%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Gemini 2.5 Pro [snapshot unspecified] 74.5%
- 2 GPT-5 74.4%
- 3 o3 73.5%
- 4
Seed1.5-VL 73.1%
- 5 o4-mini 72.7%
- 6 o1 71.5%
- 7
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 67.1%
- 8
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 66.1%
- 9 OmniVerifier 7B 65.3%
- 10 GPT-4o [snapshot unspecified] 64.5%
- 11
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 57%
Source: Official ViVerBench leaderboard
- 1
Seed2.0 Pro 75.9%
- 2 GPT-5 74.4%
- 3 o3 73.5%
- 4
Seed1.5-VL 73.1%
- 5 o4-mini 72.7%
- 6 o1 71.5%
- 7
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 67.1%
- 8
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 66.1%
- 9
Qwen2.5-VL-7B 57%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official ViVerBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro [snapshot unspecified] | 74.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | GPT-5 | 74.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | o3 | 73.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 73.1% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | o4-mini | 72.7% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | o1 | 71.5% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 67.1% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 66.1% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | OmniVerifier 7B | 65.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | GPT-4o [snapshot unspecified] | 64.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | | 57% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 75.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | GPT-5 | 74.4% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | o3 | 73.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 73.1% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | o4-mini | 72.7% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | o1 | 71.5% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 67.1% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 66.1% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 57% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official ViVerBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official ViVerBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 75.9 | ViVerBench (Table 8) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%