VQAv2
Open-ended questions about COCO images, balanced to reduce language priors. Scored by consensus accuracy against 10 human answers.
Saturated legacy benchmark.
- Made by
- Virginia Tech + Georgia Tech
- Released
- December 2016
- Kind
- General visual questions
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemma 3 27B #164 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- March 2026, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- March 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Problems at the intersection of vision and language are of significant importance both as challenging research questions and for the rich set of applications they enable. However, inherent structure in our world and bias in our language tend to be a simpler signal for learning than visual modalities, resulting in models that ignore visual information, leading to an inflated sense of their capability. We propose to counter these language priors for the task of Visual Question Answering (VQA) and make vision (the V in VQA) matter! Specifically, we balance the popular VQA dataset by collecting complementary images such that every question in our balanced dataset is associated with not just a single image, but rather a pair of similar images that result in two different answers to the question. Our dataset is by construction more balanced than the original VQA dataset and has approximately twice the number of image-question pairs. Our complete balanced dataset is publicly available at www.visualqa.org as part of the 2nd iteration of the Visual Question Answering Dataset and Challenge (VQA v2.0). We further benchmark a number of state-of-art VQA models on our balanced dataset. All models perform significantly worse on our balanced dataset, suggesting that these models have indeed learned to exploit language priors. This finding provides the first concrete empirical evidence for what seems to be a qualitative sense among practitioners. Finally, our data collection protocol for identifying complementary images enables us to develop a novel interpretable model, which in addition to providing an answer to the given (image, question) pair, also provides a counter-example based explanation. Specifically, it identifies an image that is similar to the original image, but it believes has a different answer to the same question. This can help in building trust for machines among their users.
Reka Edge leads with 88.4% among models released by March 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Molmo2-8B leads with 87.1% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Reka Edge leads with 88.4%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in March 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Reka Edge 88.4%
- 2
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 80.2%
- 3
Gemini 1.0 Ultra 77.8%
- 4 GPT-4 Mar 2023 77.2%
- 5
Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 73.2%
- 6
Gemma 3 27B 72.9%
- 7
Gemma 3 12B 71.6%
- 8
Gemma 3 4B 62.4%
Source: Labs’ model cards
Source: Official VQAv2 leaderboard
- 1 Reka Edge 88.4%
- 2
Molmo2-8B 87.1%
- 3
Molmo-72B 86.7%
- 4
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 80.2%
- 5
Gemini 1.0 Ultra 77.8%
- 6 GPT-4 Mar 2023 77.2%
- 7
Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 73.2%
- 8
Gemma 3 27B 72.9%
- 9
Gemma 3 12B 71.6%
- 10
Gemma 3 4B 62.4%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official VQAv2 leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reka Edge | 88.4% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 80.2% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 77.8% | Dec 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | GPT-4 Mar 2023 | 77.2% | Mar 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 73.2% | Feb 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 72.9% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 71.6% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 62.4% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 87.1% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 86.7% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reka Edge | 88.4% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 87.1% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 86.7% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 80.2% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 77.8% | Dec 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | GPT-4 Mar 2023 | 77.2% | Mar 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 73.2% | Feb 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 72.9% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 71.6% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 62.4% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 560 entries, 2 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023 Number one over time 6 models have held number one with claims included since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Molmo-72B on the official leaderboard passed 85% in September 2024
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official VQAv2 leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in March 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2026 | Reka Edge | 88.4 | VQA-V2 |
| Mar 12, 2025 | 72.9 | VQAv2 (PT); IT VQAv2 (val) = 71.0 | |
| May 14, 2024 | 80.2 | VQAv2 (test-dev), 0-shot | |
| Feb 15, 2024 | 73.2 | VQAv2 (test-dev), 0-shot | |
| Dec 6, 2023 | 77.8 | VQAv2 (test-dev) | |
| Mar 14, 2023 | GPT-4 | 77.2 | VQAv2 VQA score (test-dev) 0-shot |
3 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 62.4 | VQAv2 (val), IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 71 | VQAv2 (val), IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 71.6 | VQAv2 (val), IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%