WARC-Bench
Screenshot-only agents do short web subtasks, such as date pickers and scroll containers, on real sites replayed from Web Archive snapshots. A program checks the end state.
Accepted at ICLR 2026. 192 subtasks with 20 steps each. 8 models in the Fireworks index.
- Made by
- Uniphore
- Released
- October 2025
- Kind
- Web browsing
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last model added
- August 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Training web agents to navigate complex, real-world websites requires them to master $subtasks$ - short-horizon interactions on multiple UI components (e.g., choosing the correct date in a date picker, or scrolling in a container to extract information). We introduce WARC-Bench (Web Archive Benchmark), a novel web navigation benchmark featuring 438 tasks designed to evaluate multimodal AI agents on subtasks. WARC-Bench enables sandboxed interactions with dynamic and realistic webpages using Web ARChive files. We show that WARC-Bench is challenging for leading computer-use models, with the highest observed success rate being 64.8%. To improve open source models on subtask, we explore two common training techniques: supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). Experiments show that SFT models obtain a 48.8% success rate on the benchmark. Training with RLVR over SFT checkpoints, even in data-scarce settings, improves the score to 52.8% on WARC-Bench, outperforming many frontier models. Our analysis concludes that mastering these subtasks is essential for robust web planning and navigation, and is a capability not extensively evaluated by existing benchmarks.
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 64.8% among models released by August 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Claude Sonnet 4 trajectory-level 64.8%
- 2 Claude Sonnet 3.7 trajectory-level 59.8%
- 3 Ours-72B-RLVR (SFT+RLVR) step-level 52.3%
- 4 GPT-5 trajectory-level 51.3%
- 5 Ours-72B-SFT step-level 48.3%
- 6
Qwen2.5-VL-72B step-level 37.3%
- 7 computer-use-preview trajectory-level 33.8%
- 8 Ours-7B-RLVR (SFT+RLVR) step-level 29.2%
- 9 Ours-7B-SFT step-level 27.3%
- 10 OpenCUA-32B step-level 17.5%
- 11 OpenCUA-7B step-level 14%
- 12
UI-TARS-1.5 step-level 10.3%
- 13 GPT-4o Nov 2024, trajectory-level 9.17%
- 14
Qwen2.5-VL-7B step-level 4.67%
Source: Official WARC-Bench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 64.8% | trajectory-level | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 3.7 | 59.8% | trajectory-level | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Ours-72B-RLVR (SFT+RLVR) | 52.3% | step-level | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-5 | 51.3% | trajectory-level | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Ours-72B-SFT | 48.3% | step-level | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 37.3% | step-level | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | computer-use-preview | 33.8% | trajectory-level | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Ours-7B-RLVR (SFT+RLVR) | 29.2% | step-level | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Ours-7B-SFT | 27.3% | step-level | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | OpenCUA-32B | 17.5% | step-level, CUA | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | OpenCUA-7B | 14% | step-level, CUA | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 10.3% | step-level, CUA | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 9.17% | trajectory-level | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 4.67% | step-level | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official WARC-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official WARC-Bench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Computer and browser use
- BrowseComp In use Hard-to-find facts that need persistent web browsing. Short verifiable answers graded for exact correctness. Claude Fable 5 93.3%
- ScreenSpot-Pro In use GUI grounding on high-resolution professional-software screenshots. The model must locate the target UI element. GPT-6 Astra 92.7%
- AndroidWorld In use Agents complete 116 tasks across 20 real Android apps in an emulator. Each task checks the device's system state to judge success. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- OSWorld 2.1 In use Agents complete 108 long-horizon workflows across 31 self-hosted websites and desktop apps, averaging 318 tool calls. Scored by binary completion and checkpoint partial credit. Claude Opus 5.5 81.8%
- WebArena-Verified In use Agents complete 812 audited WebArena tasks on self-hosted websites. Deterministic evaluators check the agent's answer and captured network traces.
Muse Spark 1.1 69%
- MobileWorld In use Agents complete 201 tasks across 20 mobile apps, including tasks that need user clarification or MCP tools. Backend checks verify success. GPT-5 55.3%