Benchmark Almanac

WBench

ABot-World 0.5 Halo 84.8 tops its leaderboard Kling v3 Pro 79.0 leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Interactive video world models run 289 multi-turn cases with navigation, subject actions, event edits and perspective switches. 22 metrics cover quality, adherence, consistency and physics.

First release evaluates 20 video world models. 77 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.

Made by
Meituan LongCat
Released
May 2026
Kind
Interactive world models
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last model added
May 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Interactive world models are advancing rapidly, yet existing benchmarks cover only part of the required competencies, leaving no unified standard for systematic evaluation. To fill this gap, we introduce WBench, a comprehensive multi-turn benchmark for interactive world model evaluation along five dimensions, namely video quality, setting adherence, interaction adherence, consistency, and physics compliance. WBench contains 289 test cases and 1,058 interaction turns, where each case specifies a world setting and a multi-turn interaction sequence, covering diverse scenes, styles, subjects, and both first- and third-person perspectives, together with four interaction types, including navigation, subject action, event editing, and perspective switching. For navigation, WBench unifies text, 6-DoF pose, and discrete-action control, enabling evaluation of models with different native input interfaces. Evaluation uses 22 automatic sub-metrics that combine specialist vision models with large multimodal models, and all metrics are validated against human judgments. Across 20 state-of-the-art models, we find that no single model performs strongly across all dimensions. We provide detailed diagnostic insights into the characteristic strengths, weaknesses, and open challenges of each model. Code and data are available at https://github.com/meituan-longcat/WBench.

Abstract of WBench: A Comprehensive Multi-turn Benchmark for Interactive Video World Model Evaluation (arXiv:2605.25874, CC0)
44
Entries on its own leaderboard, 6 models we track

ABot-World 0.5 Halo tops the leaderboard with 84.8

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Kling v3 Pro, at 79.0.

The newest model with a score here came out in May 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 ABot-World 0.5 Halo 84.8
  2. 2 Jelly-World 82.7
  3. 3 VWA-World 82.4
  4. 4 Alaya-EVOKE-Turbo 3-step 82.0
  5. 5 XGEN-Jing bidirection 81.9
  6. 6 Enuma bidirection 81.7
  7. 7 JoyAI-Echo-1.5 (WM) bidirection 81.6
  8. 8 gd_world 81.2
  9. 9 Zing-0.5 4-step; 5B 81.0
  10. 10 Coreeny-wm-dev 4-step AR 80.9
  11. 11 HiDream-O1-World 80.9
  12. 12 Alaya-EVOKE 3-step 80.8
  13. 13 HelixWorld 4-step; AR 79.9
  14. 14 LingBot-World v2 79.4
  15. 15 Kling v3 Pro 79.0
  16. 16 AAWorld 78.8
  17. 17 LingBot-World 78.5
  18. 18 Wan 2.7 T2V 78.1
  19. 19 HY-World 1.5 78.1
  20. 20 HunyuanVideo 1.5 77.9
  21. 21 Happy Oyster 76.8
  22. 22 Lyra 2.0 76.4
  23. 23 AlayaWorld 76.3
  24. 24 Seedance v1.5 Pro 76.2
  25. 25 Cosmos3-Super 76.0
  26. 26 SANA-WM 76.0
  27. 27 DreamX-World 75.0
  28. 28 ABot-World 74.7
  29. 29 Cosmos 2.5 74.6
  30. 30 Helios Distilled 74.3
  31. 31 LTX-2.3 74.2
  32. 32 Cosmos3-Nano 74.2
  33. 33 Genie 3 73.9
  34. 34 InSpatio-World 73.9
  35. 35 Fantasy-World 73.8
  36. 36 Astronex-World 5B 73.5
  37. 37 YUME 1.5 73.3
  38. 38 LongCat-Video 73.2
  39. 39 Infinite-World 72.8
  40. 40 MatrixGame3 71.3
  41. 41 Kairos 3.0 70.3
  42. 42 MatrixGame2 68.7
  43. 43 HY-GameCraft 68.2
  44. 44 Astra 63.7

Source: Official WBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 ABot-World 0.5 Halo 84.8 Official leaderboard
2 Jelly-World 82.7 Official leaderboard
3 VWA-World 82.4 Official leaderboard
4 Alaya-EVOKE-Turbo 82.0 3-step Official leaderboard
5 XGEN-Jing 81.9 bidirection Official leaderboard
6 Enuma 81.7 bidirection Official leaderboard
7 JoyAI-Echo-1.5 (WM) 81.6 bidirection Official leaderboard
8 gd_world 81.2 Official leaderboard
9 Zing-0.5 81.0 4-step; 5B Official leaderboard
10 Coreeny-wm-dev 80.9 4-step AR Official leaderboard
11 HiDream-O1-World 80.9 Official leaderboard
12 Alaya-EVOKE 80.8 3-step Official leaderboard
13 HelixWorld 79.9 4-step; AR Official leaderboard
14 LingBot-World v2 79.4 Official leaderboard
15 Kling v3 Pro 79.0 Official leaderboard
16 AAWorld 78.8 Official leaderboard
17 LingBot-World 78.5 Official leaderboard
18 Wan 2.7 T2V 78.1 Official leaderboard
19 HY-World 1.5 78.1 Official leaderboard
20 HunyuanVideo 1.5 77.9 Official leaderboard
21 Happy Oyster 76.8 Official leaderboard
22 Lyra 2.0 76.4 Official leaderboard
23 AlayaWorld 76.3 Official leaderboard
24 Seedance v1.5 Pro 76.2 Official leaderboard
25 Cosmos3-Super 76.0 Official leaderboard
26 SANA-WM 76.0 Official leaderboard
27 DreamX-World 75.0 Official leaderboard
28 ABot-World 74.7 Official leaderboard
29 Cosmos 2.5 74.6 Official leaderboard
30 Helios 74.3 Distilled Official leaderboard
31 LTX-2.3 74.2 Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
32 Cosmos3-Nano 74.2 May 2026 Official leaderboard
33 Genie 3 73.9 Official leaderboard
34 InSpatio-World 73.9 Official leaderboard
35 Fantasy-World 73.8 Official leaderboard
36 Astronex-World 73.5 5B Official leaderboard
37 YUME 1.5 73.3 Official leaderboard
38 LongCat-Video 73.2 Official leaderboard
39 Infinite-World 72.8 Official leaderboard
40 MatrixGame3 71.3 Official leaderboard
41 Kairos 3.0 70.3 Official leaderboard
42 MatrixGame2 68.7 Official leaderboard
43 HY-GameCraft 68.2 Official leaderboard
44 Astra 63.7 Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
74.2 2026 74.2 2026

Source: Official WBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in World models

All 39 in World models
  • AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. GPT-5.4 58.3
  • IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy. Muse Spark Open 68.3%
  • QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions. Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
  • VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems. Gemini 3 Pro 91%
  • ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics. Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
  • RBench Only in system cards 650 image+text prompts for robot video generation (tasks and embodiments). MLLM judge scores task completion, physical plausibility, stability. Wan 2.6 60.7%