Benchmark Almanac

WISE

Qwen-Image-Agent 0.90 tops its leaderboard GPT-Image-1.5 0.82 leads the models we track
GPT-Image-1.5 0.82 leads
Only in system cards

Text-to-image models draw 1,000 prompts that need world knowledge in culture, space, time and natural science. A vision model judge gives the WiScore.

Scores run from 0 to 1 and cover 25 subdomains. Unified models such as BAGEL report it with and without reasoning before drawing.

Released
March 2025
Kind
Image generation and editing
Level
School
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last in a system card
May 2025
Last model added
May 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Text-to-Image (T2I) models are capable of generating high-quality artistic creations and visual content. However, existing research and evaluation standards predominantly focus on image realism and shallow text-image alignment, lacking a comprehensive assessment of complex semantic understanding and world knowledge integration in text-to-image generation. To address this challenge, we propose WISE, the first benchmark specifically designed for World Knowledge-Informed Semantic Evaluation. WISE moves beyond simple word-pixel mapping by challenging models with 1000 meticulously crafted prompts across 25 subdomains in cultural common sense, spatio-temporal reasoning, and natural science. To overcome the limitations of traditional CLIP metric, we introduce WiScore, a novel quantitative metric for assessing knowledge-image alignment. Through comprehensive testing of 20 models (10 dedicated T2I models and 10 unified multimodal models) using 1,000 structured prompts spanning 25 subdomains, our findings reveal significant limitations in their ability to effectively integrate and apply world knowledge during image generation, highlighting critical pathways for enhancing knowledge incorporation and application in next-generation T2I models. Code and data are available at PKU-YuanGroup/WISE.

Abstract of WISE: A World Knowledge-Informed Semantic Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generation (arXiv:2503.07265, CC0)
26
Entries on its own leaderboard, 11 models we track
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Qwen-Image-Agent tops the leaderboard with 0.90

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-Image-1.5, at 0.82.

GPT-Image-1.5 leads with 0.82, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in January 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Qwen-Image-Agent WISE_Verified 0.90
  2. 2 NanoBanana-Pro WISE_Verified 0.88
  3. 3 SenseNova-U1-A3B-MoT WISE_Verified; CoT 0.83
  4. 4 GPT-Image-1.5 WISE_Verified 0.82
  5. 5 Qwen-Image-2.0 WISE_Verified 0.80
  6. 6 SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT WISE_Verified; CoT 0.79
  7. 7 BAGEL WISE_Verified; CoT 0.63
  8. 8 DeepGen 1.0 WISE_Verified 0.57
  9. 9 FLUX.2 [dev] WISE_Verified 0.56
  10. 10 Qwen-Image WISE_Verified 0.51
  11. 11 Qwen-Image (2512) WISE_Verified 0.50
  12. 12 Z-Image WISE_Verified 0.45
  13. 13 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B WISE_Verified 0.44
  14. 14 HunyuanImage 3.0 WISE_Verified 0.43
  15. 15 Uniworld_V1 WISE_Verified 0.43
  16. 16 FLUX.1 [dev] WISE_Verified 0.42
  17. 17 SD-3.5-large WISE_Verified 0.40
  18. 18 FLUX.2 [klein] 4B WISE_Verified 0.40
  19. 19 SD-3-medium WISE_Verified 0.39
  20. 20 SD-3.5-medium WISE_Verified 0.38
  21. 21 FLUX.1-schnell WISE_Verified 0.36
  22. 22 SD-XL-0.9 WISE_Verified 0.36
  23. 23 Janus-Pro-7B WISE_Verified 0.33
  24. 24 SD-1.5 WISE_Verified 0.31
  25. 25 Janus-1.3B WISE_Verified 0.27
  26. 26 Janus-Pro-1B WISE_Verified 0.27

Source: Official WISE leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen-Image-Agent 0.90 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
2 NanoBanana-Pro 0.88 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
3 SenseNova-U1-A3B-MoT 0.83 WISE_Verified; CoT Official leaderboard
4 GPT-Image-1.5 0.82 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
5 Qwen-Image-2.0 0.80 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
6 SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT 0.79 WISE_Verified; CoT Official leaderboard
7 BAGEL 0.63 WISE_Verified; CoT Official leaderboard
8 DeepGen 1.0 0.57 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
9 FLUX.2 [dev] 0.56 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
10 Qwen-Image 0.51 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
11 Qwen-Image (2512) 0.50 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
12 Z-Image 0.45 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
13 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B 0.44 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
14 HunyuanImage 3.0 0.43 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
15 Uniworld_V1 0.43 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
16 FLUX.1 [dev] 0.42 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
17 SD-3.5-large 0.40 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
18 FLUX.2 [klein] 4B 0.40 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
19 SD-3-medium 0.39 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
20 SD-3.5-medium 0.38 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
21 FLUX.1-schnell 0.36 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
22 SD-XL-0.9 0.36 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
23 Janus-Pro-7B 0.33 WISE_Verified Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
24 SD-1.5 0.31 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
25 Janus-1.3B 0.27 WISE_Verified Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
26 Janus-Pro-1B 0.27 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-Image-1.5 0.82 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
2 BAGEL-7B-MoT 0.70 May 2025 Lab model card
3 BAGEL 0.63 WISE_Verified; CoT Official leaderboard
4 FLUX.2 [dev] 0.56 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
5 Qwen-Image 0.51 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
6 Qwen-Image (2512) 0.50 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
7 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B 0.44 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
8 HunyuanImage 3.0 0.43 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
9 FLUX.1 [dev] 0.42 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
10 FLUX.2 [klein] 4B 0.40 WISE_Verified Official leaderboard
11 Janus-Pro-7B 0.33 WISE_Verified Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Janus-1.3B 0.27 WISE_Verified Oct 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card
0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 2025 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 2025

Sources: Official WISE leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
May 20, 2025 BAGEL-7B-MoT technical report 0.7 WISE Overall, BAGEL w/ Self-CoT 0.70 (Table 6). Without CoT 0.52 Capabilities

Versions

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%