WISE
Text-to-image models draw 1,000 prompts that need world knowledge in culture, space, time and natural science. A vision model judge gives the WiScore.
Scores run from 0 to 1 and cover 25 subdomains. Unified models such as BAGEL report it with and without reasoning before drawing.
- Released
- March 2025
- Kind
- Image generation and editing
- Level
- School
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Last in a system card
- May 2025
- Last model added
- May 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Text-to-Image (T2I) models are capable of generating high-quality artistic creations and visual content. However, existing research and evaluation standards predominantly focus on image realism and shallow text-image alignment, lacking a comprehensive assessment of complex semantic understanding and world knowledge integration in text-to-image generation. To address this challenge, we propose WISE, the first benchmark specifically designed for World Knowledge-Informed Semantic Evaluation. WISE moves beyond simple word-pixel mapping by challenging models with 1000 meticulously crafted prompts across 25 subdomains in cultural common sense, spatio-temporal reasoning, and natural science. To overcome the limitations of traditional CLIP metric, we introduce WiScore, a novel quantitative metric for assessing knowledge-image alignment. Through comprehensive testing of 20 models (10 dedicated T2I models and 10 unified multimodal models) using 1,000 structured prompts spanning 25 subdomains, our findings reveal significant limitations in their ability to effectively integrate and apply world knowledge during image generation, highlighting critical pathways for enhancing knowledge incorporation and application in next-generation T2I models. Code and data are available at PKU-YuanGroup/WISE.
Qwen-Image-Agent tops the leaderboard with 0.90
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-Image-1.5, at 0.82.
GPT-Image-1.5 leads with 0.82, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in January 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 0.90 Qwen-Image-Agent
- 0.88 NanoBanana-Pro
- 0.83 SenseNova-U1-A3B-MoT
- 0.82 GPT-Image-1.5
- 0.80 Qwen-Image-2.0
- 0.79 SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT
- 0.63
BAGEL
- 0.57 DeepGen 1.0
- 0.56 FLUX.2 [dev]
- 0.51
Qwen-Image
- 0.50
Qwen-Image (2512)
- 0.45 Z-Image
- 0.44 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B
- 0.43
HunyuanImage 3.0
- 0.43 Uniworld_V1
- 0.42 FLUX.1 [dev]
- 0.40 SD-3.5-large
- 0.40 FLUX.2 [klein] 4B
- 0.39 SD-3-medium
- 0.38 SD-3.5-medium
- 0.36 FLUX.1-schnell
- 0.36 SD-XL-0.9
- 0.33
Janus-Pro-7B
- 0.31 SD-1.5
- 0.27
Janus-1.3B
- 0.27 Janus-Pro-1B
- 1 Qwen-Image-Agent WISE_Verified 0.90
- 2 NanoBanana-Pro WISE_Verified 0.88
- 3 SenseNova-U1-A3B-MoT WISE_Verified; CoT 0.83
- 4 GPT-Image-1.5 WISE_Verified 0.82
- 5 Qwen-Image-2.0 WISE_Verified 0.80
- 6 SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT WISE_Verified; CoT 0.79
- 7
BAGEL WISE_Verified; CoT 0.63
- 8 DeepGen 1.0 WISE_Verified 0.57
- 9 FLUX.2 [dev] WISE_Verified 0.56
- 10
Qwen-Image WISE_Verified 0.51
- 11
Qwen-Image (2512) WISE_Verified 0.50
- 12 Z-Image WISE_Verified 0.45
- 13 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B WISE_Verified 0.44
- 14
HunyuanImage 3.0 WISE_Verified 0.43
- 15 Uniworld_V1 WISE_Verified 0.43
- 16 FLUX.1 [dev] WISE_Verified 0.42
- 17 SD-3.5-large WISE_Verified 0.40
- 18 FLUX.2 [klein] 4B WISE_Verified 0.40
- 19 SD-3-medium WISE_Verified 0.39
- 20 SD-3.5-medium WISE_Verified 0.38
- 21 FLUX.1-schnell WISE_Verified 0.36
- 22 SD-XL-0.9 WISE_Verified 0.36
- 23
Janus-Pro-7B WISE_Verified 0.33
- 24 SD-1.5 WISE_Verified 0.31
- 25
Janus-1.3B WISE_Verified 0.27
- 26 Janus-Pro-1B WISE_Verified 0.27
Source: Official WISE leaderboard
- 1 GPT-Image-1.5 WISE_Verified 0.82
- 2
BAGEL-7B-MoT 0.70
- 3
BAGEL WISE_Verified; CoT 0.63
- 4 FLUX.2 [dev] WISE_Verified 0.56
- 5
Qwen-Image WISE_Verified 0.51
- 6
Qwen-Image (2512) WISE_Verified 0.50
- 7 FLUX.2 [klein] 9B WISE_Verified 0.44
- 8
HunyuanImage 3.0 WISE_Verified 0.43
- 9 FLUX.1 [dev] WISE_Verified 0.42
- 10 FLUX.2 [klein] 4B WISE_Verified 0.40
- 11
Janus-Pro-7B WISE_Verified 0.33
- 12
Janus-1.3B WISE_Verified 0.27
Sources: Official WISE leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen-Image-Agent | 0.90 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | NanoBanana-Pro | 0.88 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | SenseNova-U1-A3B-MoT | 0.83 | WISE_Verified; CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-Image-1.5 | 0.82 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Qwen-Image-2.0 | 0.80 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | SenseNova-U1-8B-MoT | 0.79 | WISE_Verified; CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 0.63 | WISE_Verified; CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | DeepGen 1.0 | 0.57 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | FLUX.2 [dev] | 0.56 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 0.51 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 0.50 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Z-Image | 0.45 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | FLUX.2 [klein] 9B | 0.44 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 0.43 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Uniworld_V1 | 0.43 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | FLUX.1 [dev] | 0.42 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | SD-3.5-large | 0.40 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | FLUX.2 [klein] 4B | 0.40 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | SD-3-medium | 0.39 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | SD-3.5-medium | 0.38 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | FLUX.1-schnell | 0.36 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | SD-XL-0.9 | 0.36 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 0.33 | WISE_Verified | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | SD-1.5 | 0.31 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 0.27 | WISE_Verified | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | Janus-Pro-1B | 0.27 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-Image-1.5 | 0.82 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 0.70 | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 0.63 | WISE_Verified; CoT | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | FLUX.2 [dev] | 0.56 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 0.51 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 0.50 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | FLUX.2 [klein] 9B | 0.44 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 0.43 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | FLUX.1 [dev] | 0.42 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | FLUX.2 [klein] 4B | 0.40 | WISE_Verified | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 0.33 | WISE_Verified | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 0.27 | WISE_Verified | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official WISE leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2025 | | 0.7 | WISE Overall, BAGEL w/ Self-CoT 0.70 (Table 6). Without CoT 0.52 | Capabilities |
Versions
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%