WorldAuditBench
Multimodal agents explore interactive 3D worlds to find anomalies such as floating objects, walls that can be walked through or out-of-place objects.
79 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.
- Made by
- UC Santa Barbara (UCSB NLP)
- Released
- September 2026
- Kind
- Embodied reasoning
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
As interactive 3D worlds are increasingly used to study intelligent behavior, it becomes important to develop efficient pipelines for identifying anomalies in these simulated environments, such as floating objects, traversable walls, or objects inconsistent with the surrounding scene. Multimodal AI systems, including vision-language models (VLMs) and vision-language-action models (VLAs), have shown potential for automating this task. However, 3D world auditing is complex, requiring the close coupling of two distinct capabilities: action, to navigate the 3D world and search for anomalies systematically and efficiently; and visual reasoning, to understand the environment and identify anomalies from multimodal observations. It remains largely unexplored whether multimodal agents can effectively couple these two capabilities, using visual reasoning to identify potential anomalies while taking actions to validate them. In this paper, we introduce WorldAuditBench, a benchmark for 3D world auditing comprising 213 anomaly tasks across 13 environments built with Unreal Engine 5 and Three.js, spanning five anomaly families. We evaluate five frontier models under a fixed exploration budget using two auditing paradigms: VLA-based exploration followed by VLM-based anomaly identification, and an end-to-end VLM agent in which visual reasoning directly guides action selection. Across the evaluated models and two paradigms, success rates range from 6.6% to 42.3%, substantially below human performance (83.4%). Through the task of world auditing, WorldAuditBench provides a testbed for studying how multimodal agents couple action and visual reasoning in interactive 3D environments, while highlighting current limitations in their ability to gather and interpret evidence during exploration.
GPT-6 Astra leads with 42.3% among models released by September 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 14 more
- 1 GPT-6 Astra 42.3%
- 2
Gemini 3.8 Flash 32.4%
- 3 Claude Opus 5 28.2%
- 4
Muse Spark 1.3 15%
- 5
Qwen3.8 Flash 12.7%
Source: Official WorldAuditBench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Astra | 42.3% | VLM-only | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 32.4% | VLM-only | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Opus 5 | 28.2% | VLM-only | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 15% | VLM-only | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 12.7% | VLA-VLM | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
The best score, 42.3%, costs $2.96 a task
Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.
Source: Official WorldAuditBench leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6 Astra | VLM-only | 42.3% | $2.96 | ||
| | VLM-only | 32.4% | $1.38 | ||
| Claude Opus 5 | VLM-only | 28.2% | $2.44 | ||
| | VLA-VLM | 17.4% | $0.30 | ||
| GPT-6 Astra | VLA-VLM | 16.4% | $0.28 | ||
| Claude Opus 5 | VLA-VLM | 15% | $0.73 | ||
| | VLM-only | 15% | $0.79 | ||
| | VLA-VLM | 12.7% | $0.04 | ||
| | VLM-only | 8.50% | $0.08 | ||
| | VLA-VLM | 6.60% | $0.11 |
3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in September 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official WorldAuditBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official WorldAuditBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Robotics
- ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
- RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
- RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
- Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
- Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
- Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds.
Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%