YoCausal
Video generation models are tested for causal and arrow-of-time understanding by comparing real videos with their time-reversed versions, in two levels.
Level 1 uses a Reverse Surprise Index. 51 HF paper upvotes.
- Made by
- Alaya Lab
- Released
- May 2026
- Kind
- Physical prediction
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Last model added
- July 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
As video diffusion models (VDMs) advance toward world models, a key question arises: do they truly understand causality, or merely overfit to statistical temporal patterns? Existing benchmarks mostly rely on synthetic data, limiting real-world generalization due to the sim-to-real gap. We present YoCausal, a two-level benchmark inspired by the Violation of Expectation (VoE) paradigm from cognitive science. By temporally reversing real-world videos at zero cost as natural counterfactual samples, YoCausal establishes an arbitrarily extensible evaluation protocol. Level 1 introduces the Reverse Surprise Index (RSI), quantifying arrow-of-time perception via denoising loss. Level 2 introduces the Causality Cognition Index (CCI), which leverages a VLM to stratify datasets into causal and non-causal subsets, disentangling genuine causal reasoning from temporal bias. Evaluation of 13 state-of-the-art VDMs reveals that perceiving the arrow of time does not imply understanding causality, and a significant gap persists relative to human-level causal cognition. Project page: https://www.youzhexie.me/papers/YoCausal/
Human tops the leaderboard with 79.1
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Wan2.2-T2V-A14B, at 54.2.
The newest model with a score here came out in July 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Human 79.1
- 2 LTX-Video-2b-0.9.6 58.9
- 3 LTX-Video-13b-0.9.8 56.5
- 4
Wan2.2-T2V-A14B 54.2
- 5
Wan2.1-T2V-14B 53.2
- 6 HunyuanVideo 52.0
- 7
Wan2.2-TI2V-5B 51.9
- 8 CogVideoX-5b 49.9
- 9 Mochi-1-preview 49.1
- 10 CogVideoX1.5-5b 46.8
- 11 AnimateDiff-SD-1.5 45.7
- 12
Wan2.1-T2V-1.3B 45.5
- 13 CogVideoX-2b 41.5
- 14 AnimateDiff-SDXL 41.2
Source: Official YoCausal leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Human | 79.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | LTX-Video-2b-0.9.6 | 58.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | LTX-Video-13b-0.9.8 | 56.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | | 54.2 | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 53.2 | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | HunyuanVideo | 52.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | | 51.9 | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | CogVideoX-5b | 49.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | Mochi-1-preview | 49.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | CogVideoX1.5-5b | 46.8 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | AnimateDiff-SD-1.5 | 45.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | | 45.5 | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | CogVideoX-2b | 41.5 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | AnimateDiff-SDXL | 41.2 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official YoCausal leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official YoCausal leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in World models
- AgentWorldBench In use Language world models predict the next environment observation after an agent action, in 7 domains from MCP and search to Android and desktop OS. A judge model scores each prediction against the real observation on five dimensions. GPT-5.4 58.3
- IntPhys 2 In use Models watch simulated videos and judge whether each event is physically possible, testing object permanence, immutability, continuity and solidity. Scored by accuracy.
Muse Spark Open 68.3%
- QwenWorldBench Fading Models act as world models that simulate agent environments in 7 domains, such as terminal, web, and Android. A rubric judge scores five dimensions.
Qwen3.7-Plus 62.1%
- VPCT Fading Models view an image of a ball, ramps, and three buckets and predict which bucket the ball falls into. Scored by accuracy on 100 problems.
Gemini 3 Pro 91%
- ContPhy Fading Models infer physical properties such as mass and density of fluids and soft bodies from videos and predict their dynamics.
Seed2.0 Pro 67.4%
- RBench Only in system cards 650 image+text prompts for robot video generation (tasks and embodiments). MLLM judge scores task completion, physical plausibility, stability.
Wan 2.6 60.7%