Benchmark Almanac

DeepSeek-V2.5 Sep 2024

DeepSeek-V2.5 places in the top three on 2 benchmarks.

DeepSeek Released September 6th, 2024 Family DeepSeek-V2 The lab's model card Compare with others
23
Benchmarks with a score
0
Ranked first, out of five or more models
2
In the top three
DeepSeek Sep 2024

DeepSeek-V2.5

Sep 2024 snapshot Open weights Flagship

123.1 #328 of 404
Self-Reported Index, from the lab's own numbers. No Epoch Capabilities Index score yet.
  • KOR-Bench 47.8% #14 /33
  • BigCodeBench-Hard 26.1% #39 /96
  • MHPP 40% #9 /23

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
Chinese SimpleQA 55.7% #4 of 27 Official leaderboard
EQ-Bench v2 82.0 #17 of 85 Official leaderboard
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (HHEM) 2.40% #30 of 148 Official leaderboard
MT-Bench 9.02 #6 of 23 Lab model card
MMLU-Pro 65.8% #98 of 212 Official leaderboard
Arena-Hard-Auto 76.2% #21 of 39 Lab model card
AlpacaEval 2.0 50.5% #10 of 16 Lab model card
LMArena (Elo) 1,307 #222 of 335 Official leaderboard
AlignBench 8.04 #10 of 15 Lab model card

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
KOR-Bench 47.8% #14 of 33 Official leaderboard
CNMO 2024 10.8% #5 of 7 Official leaderboard

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
HumanEval 89% #17 of 101 Lab model card
HumanEval+ 83.5% #8 of 46 Official leaderboard
MBPP+ 74.1% #7 of 35 Official leaderboard
MBPP 87.6% #9 of 35 Official leaderboard
MHPP 40% #9 of 23 Official leaderboard
BigCodeBench-Hard 26.1% #39 of 96 Official leaderboard
Aider-Edit 72.2% #3 of 5 Lab model card
HumanEval Multi 73.8% #3 of 5 Lab model card
LiveCodeBench 41.8% #34 of 54 Lab model card
SWE-bench Verified 16.8% #155 of 155 Lab model card
DS-Arena-Code 63.1% #1 of 1 Lab model card
DS-FIM-Eval 78.3% #1 of 1 Lab model card

Its lab's numbers put it at 123.1, number 328 of 404

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 5 capability results DeepSeek reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 119.1 to 127.1. How we compute it.

Its lab's numbers next to 4 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
HumanEval 89% HumanEval python 90.2% Leaderboard −1.2 pts
Aider-Edit 72.2% Aider 72.2% Leaderboard, aider, diff edits Same
DS-Arena-Code 63.1% DS-Arena-Code (in-house) 63.1% Leaderboard Same
DS-FIM-Eval 78.3% DS-FIM-Eval (in-house) 78.3% Leaderboard Same

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.