CMMLU
Chinese multiple-choice questions across 67 subjects including China-specific topics. Accuracy.
Saturated. HF dataset haonan-li/cmmlu now redirects to lmlmcat/cmmlu.
- Made by
- MBZUAI + others (Li et al.)
- Released
- June 2023
- Kind
- Exam questions
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
DeepSeek-V4-Pro #69 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- April 2026, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- April 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
As the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, evaluating their performance becomes increasingly crucial and challenging. This paper aims to bridge this gap by introducing CMMLU, a comprehensive Chinese benchmark that covers various subjects, including natural science, social sciences, engineering, and humanities. We conduct a thorough evaluation of 18 advanced multilingual- and Chinese-oriented LLMs, assessing their performance across different subjects and settings. The results reveal that most existing LLMs struggle to achieve an average accuracy of 50%, even when provided with in-context examples and chain-of-thought prompts, whereas the random baseline stands at 25%. This highlights significant room for improvement in LLMs. Additionally, we conduct extensive experiments to identify factors impacting the models' performance and propose directions for enhancing LLMs. CMMLU fills the gap in evaluating the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of large language models within the Chinese context.
2 models share the top score of 90.8% among models released by April 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Qwen2-72B leads with 89.7% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Hunyuan-TurboS leads with 90.8%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 90.8
Hunyuan-TurboS
- 90.8
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 90.2
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B
- 90.2
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 90.1
Qwen2-72B
- 90.0
Hunyuan-T1
- 89.4
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 89.1
Ring-1T
- 88.8
DeepSeek-V3
- 84.3
LongCat-Flash-Chat
- 83.5
Qwen1.5-72B
- 83.1
InternLM3-8B-Instruct
- 81.6
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
- 78.2 Moonlight-16B-A3B
- 71.0
Qwen-14B
- 67.8
DeepSeek LLM 67B
- 67.5 ChatGLM3-6B
- 1
Hunyuan-TurboS 90.8%
- 2
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 90.8%
- 3
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B 90.2%
- 4
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 90.2%
- 5
Qwen2-72B 90.1%
- 6
Hunyuan-T1 90%
- 7
LongCat-Flash-Omni 89.4%
- 8
Ring-1T 89.1%
- 9
DeepSeek-V3 88.8%
- 10
LongCat-Flash-Chat 84.3%
- 11
Qwen1.5-72B 83.5%
- 12
InternLM3-8B-Instruct 83.1%
- 13
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) 81.6%
- 14 Moonlight-16B-A3B 78.2%
- 15
Qwen-14B 71%
- 16
DeepSeek LLM 67B 67.8%
- 17 ChatGLM3-6B 67.5%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1
Qwen2-72B Five-shot 89.7%
- 2
Qwen1.5-110B Five-shot 88.3%
- 3
Qwen2.5-72B Five-shot 85.7%
- 4
Qwen1.5-72B Five-shot 83.5%
- 5
Qwen1.5-32B Five-shot 82.3%
- 6
Qwen1.5-7B Five-shot 72.5%
- 7
Qwen-7B Five-shot 58.7%
- 8 chatglm2-6b Zero-shot 50%
- 9
Falcon-40B Five-shot 41.5%
- 10 ChatGLM-6B Zero-shot 40.8%
- 11
LLaMA-65B Five-shot 39.8%
Source: Official CMMLU leaderboard
- 90.8
Hunyuan-TurboS
- 90.8
DeepSeek-V4-Pro
- 90.2
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B
- 90.2
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 90.1
Qwen2-72B
- 90.0
Hunyuan-T1
- 89.4
LongCat-Flash-Omni
- 89.1
Ring-1T
- 88.8
DeepSeek-V3
- 88.3
Qwen1.5-110B
- 85.7
Qwen2.5-72B
- 84.3
LongCat-Flash-Chat
- 83.5
Qwen1.5-72B
- 83.1
InternLM3-8B-Instruct
- 82.3
Qwen1.5-32B
- 81.6
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024)
- 78.2 Moonlight-16B-A3B
- 72.5
Qwen1.5-7B
- 71.0
Qwen-14B
- 67.8
DeepSeek LLM 67B
- 67.5 ChatGLM3-6B
- 58.7
Qwen-7B
- 50.0 chatglm2-6b
- 41.5
Falcon-40B
- 40.8 ChatGLM-6B
- 39.8
LLaMA-65B
- 1
Hunyuan-TurboS 90.8%
- 2
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 90.8%
- 3
ERNIE-4.5-300B-A47B 90.2%
- 4
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 90.2%
- 5
Qwen2-72B 90.1%
- 6
Hunyuan-T1 90%
- 7
LongCat-Flash-Omni 89.4%
- 8
Ring-1T 89.1%
- 9
DeepSeek-V3 88.8%
- 10
Qwen1.5-110B Five-shot 88.3%
- 11
Qwen2.5-72B Five-shot 85.7%
- 12
LongCat-Flash-Chat 84.3%
- 13
Qwen1.5-72B Five-shot 83.5%
- 14
InternLM3-8B-Instruct 83.1%
- 15
Qwen1.5-32B Five-shot 82.3%
- 16
DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) 81.6%
- 17 Moonlight-16B-A3B 78.2%
- 18
Qwen1.5-7B Five-shot 72.5%
- 19
Qwen-14B 71%
- 20
DeepSeek LLM 67B 67.8%
- 21 ChatGLM3-6B 67.5%
- 22
Qwen-7B Five-shot 58.7%
- 23 chatglm2-6b Zero-shot 50%
- 24
Falcon-40B Five-shot 41.5%
- 25 ChatGLM-6B Zero-shot 40.8%
- 26
LLaMA-65B Five-shot 39.8%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official CMMLU leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 90.8% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 90.8% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 90.2% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 90.2% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 90.1% | Jun 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 90% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 89.4% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 89.1% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 88.8% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 84.3% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 83.5% | Feb 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 83.1% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 81.6% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | Moonlight-16B-A3B | 78.2% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 71% | Sep 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 67.8% | Nov 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | ChatGLM3-6B | 67.5% | Oct 2023 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 89.7% | Five-shot | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 88.3% | Five-shot | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | | 85.7% | Five-shot | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 83.5% | Five-shot | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 82.3% | Five-shot | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 72.5% | Five-shot | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 58.7% | Five-shot | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | chatglm2-6b | 50% | Zero-shot | Jun 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 41.5% | Five-shot | Mar 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | ChatGLM-6B | 40.8% | Zero-shot | Mar 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 39.8% | Five-shot | Feb 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 90.8% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 90.8% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 90.2% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | | 90.2% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 90.1% | Jun 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 90% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 89.4% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 89.1% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 88.8% | Dec 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 88.3% | Five-shot | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 85.7% | Five-shot | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 84.3% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 83.5% | Five-shot | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | | 83.1% | Jan 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 82.3% | Five-shot | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | | 81.6% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | Moonlight-16B-A3B | 78.2% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 72.5% | Five-shot | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | | 71% | Sep 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 67.8% | Nov 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | ChatGLM3-6B | 67.5% | Oct 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 58.7% | Five-shot | Sep 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | chatglm2-6b | 50% | Zero-shot | Jun 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | | 41.5% | Five-shot | Mar 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | ChatGLM-6B | 40.8% | Zero-shot | Mar 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 26 | | 39.8% | Five-shot | Feb 2023 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 47 entries, 11 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official CMMLU leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Five-shot | 89.7% | |||
| | Five-shot | 88.3% | |||
| | Zero-shot | 87.6% | |||
| | Zero-shot | 87.5% | |||
| | Five-shot | 85.7% | |||
| | Zero-shot | 84.7% | |||
| | Five-shot | 83.5% | |||
| | Five-shot | 82.3% | |||
| | Zero-shot | 81.8% | |||
| | Zero-shot | 81.5% | |||
| | Five-shot | 72.5% | |||
| | Zero-shot | 71% | |||
| | Five-shot | 58.7% | |||
| | Zero-shot | 57.6% | |||
| chatglm2-6b | Zero-shot | 50% | |||
| chatglm2-6b | Five-shot | 48.8% | |||
| | Five-shot | 41.5% | |||
| ChatGLM-6B | Zero-shot | 40.8% | |||
| | Five-shot | 39.8% | |||
| | Zero-shot | 38.5% | |||
| ChatGLM-6B | Five-shot | 37.5% | |||
| | Zero-shot | 34.9% |
4 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in June 2023 6 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in June 2023 7 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official CMMLU leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Qwen1.5-110B on the official leaderboard passed 85% in April 2024
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official CMMLU leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | 90.8 | CMMLU (EM) | |
| Oct 31, 2025 | 89.4 | CMMLU(acc) | |
| Aug 29, 2025 | 84.3 | CMMLU(acc) | |
| Jun 30, 2025 | 90.2 | CMMLU | |
| Mar 21, 2025 | 90 | CMMLU | |
| Mar 16, 2025 | CMMLU | ||
| Feb 27, 2025 | 90.8 | CMMLU | |
| Feb 22, 2025 | Moonlight-16B-A3B | 78.2 | CMMLU |
| Jan 28, 2025 | CMMLU | ||
| Jan 13, 2025 | 83.1 | CMMLU(0-shot) | |
| Dec 26, 2024 | 88.8 | CMMLU (Acc.) | |
| Jun 7, 2024 | 90.1 | CMMLU | |
| May 7, 2024 | 81.6 | CMMLU | |
| Feb 5, 2024 | 83.5 | CMMLU | |
| Nov 29, 2023 | 67.8 | CMMLU | |
| Oct 27, 2023 | ChatGLM3-6B | 67.5 | CMMLU |
| Sep 25, 2023 | 71 | CMMLU (5-shot) |
8 system cards report it, from 6 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2025 | | 89.4 | CMMLU (acc) (Table 13) | Capabilities |
| Oct 21, 2025 | | 89.1 | CMMLU (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| Sep 1, 2025 | | 84.3 | CMMLU (acc) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Aug 25, 2025 | | 90.2 | CMMLU, OpenCompass (Table 14) | Capabilities |
| Jun 29, 2025 | | 90.2 | CMMLU (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Jun 18, 2024 | ChatGLM3-6B technical report | 67.5 | ChatGLM3-6B-Base, CMMLU (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| May 7, 2024 | | 81.6 | CMMLU 5-shot, DeepSeek-V2 Chat (RL) (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Jan 5, 2024 | | 67.8 | CMMLU 0-shot, DeepSeek 67B Chat (Table 6) | Capabilities |
2 lab claims next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
More in Knowledge
- MMLU-Pro In use Harder 10-option version of MMLU with reasoning-focused questions across 14 subjects.
Intern-S2-397B 89.8%
- SuperGPQA In use 26,529 graduate-level multiple-choice questions across 285 disciplines. Accuracy.
Qwen 3.6 Max (Preview) 73.9%
- WideSearch In use 200 bilingual broad info-seeking tasks: agent collects many atomic facts into a table. Scored by success rate and row/item F1.
Tencent Hy4 preview 83.9%
- BBEH micro average In use Models solve harder replacements for each of the 23 BIG-Bench Hard tasks, 4,520 examples in total. The score is the share of all examples answered correctly.
Gemma 4 31B IT 74.4%
- KMMLU-Pro In use Models answer multiple-choice questions taken from Korean National Professional Licensure exams. It tests professional knowledge used in Korean industry.
Solar Pro 4 79.2%
- HLE-Verified In use Verified and revised version of Humanity's Last Exam (1,811 items) with uncertain items removed.
Seed2.0 Pro 73.6%