Benchmark Almanac

AI2D

ERNIE 5.0 96.9% leads since February 2026
Fading

Models answer multiple choice questions about grade school science diagrams. The set has about 5,000 diagrams and 15,000 questions, scored by accuracy.

Released
March 2016
Kind
Visual math and diagrams
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen 3.6 Plus #74 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026, dropped after it saturated
Last model added
August 2026

In the authors’ words

Diagrams are common tools for representing complex concepts, relationships and events, often when it would be difficult to portray the same information with natural images. Understanding natural images has been extensively studied in computer vision, while diagram understanding has received little attention. In this paper, we study the problem of diagram interpretation and reasoning, the challenging task of identifying the structure of a diagram and the semantics of its constituents and their relationships. We introduce Diagram Parse Graphs (DPG) as our representation to model the structure of diagrams. We define syntactic parsing of diagrams as learning to infer DPGs for diagrams and study semantic interpretation and reasoning of diagrams in the context of diagram question answering. We devise an LSTM-based method for syntactic parsing of diagrams and introduce a DPG-based attention model for diagram question answering. We compile a new dataset of diagrams with exhaustive annotations of constituents and relationships for over 5,000 diagrams and 15,000 questions and answers. Our results show the significance of our models for syntactic parsing and question answering in diagrams using DPGs.

Abstract of A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Images (arXiv:1603.07396, CC0)
52
Models scored in lab cards
44
Launch posts list it, from 15 labs
30
System cards report it, from 12 labs

ERNIE 5.0 leads with 96.9% among models released by August 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 ERNIE 5.0 96.9%
  2. 2 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 95.3%
  3. 3 ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 95.3%
  4. 4 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 94.7%
  5. 5 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 94.4%
  6. 6 Qwen 3.6 Plus 94.4%
  7. 7 GPT-4o May 2024 94.2%
  8. 8 Command A Vision 94%
  9. 9 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 93.9%
  10. 10 Mistral Small 3.1 93.7%
  11. 11 Mistral Medium 3 93.7%
  12. 12 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.3%
  13. 13 Mistral Small 3.2 92.9%
  14. 14 Qwen3.5-27B 92.9%
  15. 15 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 92.7%
  16. 16 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 92.6%
  17. 17 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 91.2%
  18. 18 Qwen3.5-9B 90.2%
  19. 19 Qwen3.5-4B 89.6%
  20. 20 STEP3-VL-10B 89.3%
  21. 21 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 89.2%
  22. 22 Seed1.8 89.1%
  23. 23 EXAONE 4.5 33B 89%
  24. 24 GLM-4.6V 88.8%
  25. 25 Claude 3 Sonnet 88.7%
  26. 26 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 88.7%
  27. 27 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 88.5%
  28. 28 Claude 3 Opus 88.1%
  29. 29 GLM-4.5V 88.1%
  30. 30 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 87.9%
  31. 31 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 87.8%
  32. 32 Seed1.5-VL 87.3%
  33. 33 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 87.3%
  34. 34 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 87.1%
  35. 35 Claude 3 Haiku 86.7%
  36. 36 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 85.2%
  37. 37 Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-VL-8B-V1 85%
  38. 38 Cosmos3-Nano 85%
  39. 39 Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B 84.8%
  40. 40 Gemma 3 27B 84.5%
  41. 41 Gemma 3 12B 84.2%
  42. 42 Qwen3.5-2B 83.3%
  43. 43 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 83.2%
  44. 44 Phi-4-multimodal 82.3%
  45. 45 Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 80.3%
  46. 46 Gemini 1.0 Ultra 79.5%
  47. 47 GPT-4 Mar 2023 78.2%
  48. 48 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 78.1%
  49. 49 North Micro Vision Instruct 77.5%
  50. 50 Cosmos3-Edge 75.4%
  51. 51 Gemma 3 4B 74.8%
  52. 52 Qwen3.5-0.8B 69.9%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 ERNIE 5.0 96.9% Feb 2026 Lab model card
2 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 95.3% Oct 2024 Lab model card
3 ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 95.3% Nov 2025 Lab model card
4 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 94.7% Jun 2024 Lab model card
5 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 94.4% May 2024 Lab model card
6 Qwen 3.6 Plus 94.4% Apr 2026 Lab model card
7 GPT-4o May 2024 94.2% May 2024 Lab model card
8 Command A Vision 94% Jul 2025 Lab model card
9 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 93.9% Feb 2026 Lab model card
10 Mistral Small 3.1 93.7% Mar 2025 Lab model card
11 Mistral Medium 3 93.7% May 2025 Lab model card
12 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.3% Feb 2026 Lab model card
13 Mistral Small 3.2 92.9% Jun 2025 Lab model card
14 Qwen3.5-27B 92.9% Feb 2026 Lab model card
15 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 92.7% Apr 2026 Lab model card
16 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 92.6% Feb 2026 Lab model card
17 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 91.2% Mar 2026 Lab model card
18 Qwen3.5-9B 90.2% Mar 2026 Lab model card
19 Qwen3.5-4B 89.6% Mar 2026 Lab model card
20 STEP3-VL-10B 89.3% Jan 2026 Lab model card
21 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 89.2% Sep 2025 Lab model card
22 Seed1.8 89.1% Dec 2025 Lab model card
23 EXAONE 4.5 33B 89% Apr 2026 Lab model card
24 GLM-4.6V 88.8% Dec 2025 Lab model card
25 Claude 3 Sonnet 88.7% Mar 2024 Lab model card
26 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 88.7% Feb 2025 Lab model card
27 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 88.5% Apr 2026 Lab model card
28 Claude 3 Opus 88.1% Mar 2024 Lab model card
29 GLM-4.5V 88.1% Aug 2025 Lab model card
30 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 87.9% Jul 2025 Lab model card
31 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 87.8% May 2026 Lab model card
32 Seed1.5-VL 87.3% May 2025 Lab model card
33 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 87.3% Aug 2025 Lab model card
34 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 87.1% Oct 2025 Lab model card
35 Claude 3 Haiku 86.7% Mar 2024 Lab model card
36 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 85.2% Sep 2025 Lab model card
37 Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-VL-8B-V1 85% Jun 2025 Lab model card
38 Cosmos3-Nano 85% May 2026 Lab model card
39 Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B 84.8% Mar 2026 Lab model card
40 Gemma 3 27B 84.5% Mar 2025 Lab model card
41 Gemma 3 12B 84.2% Mar 2025 Lab model card
42 Qwen3.5-2B 83.3% Mar 2026 Lab model card
43 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 83.2% Mar 2025 Lab model card
44 Phi-4-multimodal 82.3% Feb 2025 Lab model card
45 Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 80.3% Feb 2024 Lab model card
46 Gemini 1.0 Ultra 79.5% Dec 2023 Lab model card
47 GPT-4 Mar 2023 78.2% Mar 2023 Lab model card
48 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 78.1% Aug 2024 Lab model card
49 North Micro Vision Instruct 77.5% Aug 2026 Lab model card
50 Cosmos3-Edge 75.4% May 2026 Lab model card
51 Gemma 3 4B 74.8% Mar 2025 Lab model card
52 Qwen3.5-0.8B 69.9% Mar 2026 Lab model card

9 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Google DeepMind Anthropic Baidu
Lab claims Passed 85% in Mar 2024, by Claude 3 Sonnet
ERNIE 5.0 96.9%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Anthropic’s own number for Claude 3 Sonnet passed 85% in March 2024

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) ERNIE 5.0 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) Claude 3 Sonnet Gemini 1.5 Pro GPT-4 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2023 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) ERNIE 5.0 Claude 3 Sonnet

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in August 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

OpenAI
Google DeepMind
Anthropic
Qwen
Microsoft
Mistral AI
ByteDance Seed
NVIDIA
Z.ai
Cohere
Shanghai AI Lab
Baidu
StepFun
LG AI Research
Kuaishou
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 12, 2026 North Micro Vision Instruct 77.5 AI2D_TEST
May 25, 2026 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 87.8 AI2D_TEST
Apr 15, 2026 Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 92.7 AI2D_TEST
Apr 9, 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B 89 AI2D
Apr 2, 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 94.4 AI2D_TEST
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 91.2 AI2D_TEST
Mar 4, 2026 Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B 84.8 AI2D_TEST (default mode)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-0.8B 69.9 AI2D_TEST 69.9/68.7 (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-2B 83.3 AI2D_TEST 83.3/81.5 (with CI / without CI)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-4B 89.6 AI2D_TEST
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-9B 90.2 AI2D_TEST
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 92.6 AI2D_TEST
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-27B 92.9 AI2D_TEST
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.3 AI2D_TEST
Feb 16, 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 93.9 AI2D_TEST
Feb 6, 2026 ERNIE 5.0 96.9 AI2D
Jan 13, 2026 STEP3-VL-10B 89.3 AI2D
Dec 18, 2025 Seed1.8 89.1 AI2D
Dec 8, 2025 GLM-4.6V 88.8 AI2D
Nov 11, 2025 ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 95.3 AI2D (transparent)
Oct 28, 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 87.1 AI2D (test)
Sep 23, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 89.2 AI2D_TEST
Sep 22, 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 85.2 AI2D
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 87.3 AI2D (w/ mask)
Aug 11, 2025 GLM-4.5V 88.1 AI2D
Jul 31, 2025 Command A Vision 94 AI2D
Jul 1, 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 87.9 AI2D
Jun 20, 2025 Mistral Small 3.2 92.9 AI2D
Jun 3, 2025 Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-VL-8B-V1 85 AI2D
May 12, 2025 Seed1.5-VL 87.3 AI2D
May 7, 2025 Mistral Medium 3 93.7 AI2D 0-shot
Mar 27, 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 83.2 AI2D
Mar 17, 2025 Mistral Small 3.1 93.7 AI2D
Mar 12, 2025 Gemma 3 27B 84.5 AI2D (IT); PT = 79.0
Feb 26, 2025 Phi-4-multimodal 82.3 AI2D
Jan 28, 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 88.4 AI2D_TEST
Oct 22, 2024 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 95.3 AI2D (test)
Jun 20, 2024 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 94.7 AI2D (test)
May 14, 2024 Gemini 1.5 Pro 94.4 Ai2D (test), 0-shot
May 13, 2024 GPT-4o 94.2 AI2D (%) (test)
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Opus 88.1 AI2D (test)
Feb 15, 2024 Gemini 1.5 Pro 80.3 Ai2D (test), 0-shot
Dec 6, 2023 Gemini 1.0 Ultra 79.5 AI2D (test)
Mar 14, 2023 GPT-4 78.2 AI2 Diagram (AI2D) Accuracy (test) 0-shot

30 system cards report it, from 12 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 9, 2026 Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B technical report 87.8 AI2D_TEST (Figure 5, printed value) Capabilities
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Nano technical report 85 AI2D, Cosmos3-Nano 8B column, Table 10 Capabilities
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Edge technical report 75.4 AI2D, Cosmos3-Edge 2B column, Table 10 Capabilities
Apr 27, 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B technical report 88.5 AI2D (Test), 88.5 with reasoning on and off (Table 7) Capabilities
Apr 17, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 91.2 AI2D_TEST (Table 6) Capabilities
Apr 9, 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B technical report 89 AI2D (Table 2, Reasoning mode) Capabilities
Mar 21, 2026 Seed1.8 model card 89.1 AI2D (Table 2) Capabilities
Mar 4, 2026 Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B technical report 84.8 AI2D TEST, default mode, 84.7 force nothink, 79.7 force thinking (Tables 5 and 6) Capabilities
Feb 4, 2026 ERNIE 5.0 technical report 96.9 AI2D (Table 3) Capabilities
Jan 14, 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 89.3 AI2D, SeRe (Table 1) Capabilities
Jan 1, 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 88.8 AI2D, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Nov 26, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 89.2 AI2D w. M. (Table 2) Capabilities
Nov 6, 2025 Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL technical report 84.7 AI2D (Test), reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 87.2 Capabilities
Sep 22, 2025 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B technical report 85.2 AI2D w.M., Instruct (Table 9). Thinking 86.1 (Table 10) Capabilities
Aug 25, 2025 InternVL3.5-241B-A28B technical report 87.3 AI2D (w/ mask) (Table 2). Without mask 95.0 (Table 4) Capabilities
Aug 13, 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 88.1 AI2D, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Jul 1, 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 87.9 AI2D, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
May 11, 2025 Seed1.5-VL technical report 87.3 AI2D, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 88.5 Capabilities
Mar 26, 2025 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B technical report 83.2 AI2D (Table 5) Capabilities
Mar 25, 2025 Gemma 3 4B technical report 74.8 AI2D, IT, P&S applied (Table 16) Capabilities
Mar 25, 2025 Gemma 3 27B technical report 84.5 AI2D, IT, P&S applied (Table 16) Capabilities
Mar 25, 2025 Gemma 3 12B technical report 84.2 AI2D, IT, P&S applied (Table 16) Capabilities
Mar 3, 2025 Phi-4-multimodal technical report 82.3 AI2D (test) (Table 1). Speech-prompt ShareGPT4o AI2D 68.9 (Table 2) Capabilities
Feb 19, 2025 Qwen2.5-VL-72B technical report 88.7 AI2D w. M. (Table 5) Capabilities
Oct 22, 2024 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) model card 95.3 AI2D (test), 0-shot (Table 5) Capabilities
Aug 30, 2024 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct technical report 78.1 AI2D (test) (Table 5) Capabilities
Jun 20, 2024 Claude 3.5 Sonnet model card 94.7 AI2D (test), 0-shot (Table 2) Capabilities
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Sonnet model card 88.7 AI2D (test), 0-shot. The text of 5.3 gives 89.2 (Table 3) Capabilities
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Opus model card 88.1 AI2D (test), 0-shot. The text of 5.3 gives 88.3 (Table 3) Capabilities
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Haiku model card 86.7 AI2D (test), 0-shot. The text of 5.3 gives 80.6 (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Vision

All 281 in Vision
  • MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
  • MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
  • CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
  • MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
  • MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy. Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
  • ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance. Command A Vision 90.9%