AI2D
Models answer multiple choice questions about grade school science diagrams. The set has about 5,000 diagrams and 15,000 questions, scored by accuracy.
- Made by
- Allen Institute for AI (AI2)
- Released
- March 2016
- Kind
- Visual math and diagrams
- Level
- School
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Multiple choice
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Qwen 3.6 Plus #74 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026, dropped after it saturated
- Last model added
- August 2026
In the authors’ words
Diagrams are common tools for representing complex concepts, relationships and events, often when it would be difficult to portray the same information with natural images. Understanding natural images has been extensively studied in computer vision, while diagram understanding has received little attention. In this paper, we study the problem of diagram interpretation and reasoning, the challenging task of identifying the structure of a diagram and the semantics of its constituents and their relationships. We introduce Diagram Parse Graphs (DPG) as our representation to model the structure of diagrams. We define syntactic parsing of diagrams as learning to infer DPGs for diagrams and study semantic interpretation and reasoning of diagrams in the context of diagram question answering. We devise an LSTM-based method for syntactic parsing of diagrams and introduce a DPG-based attention model for diagram question answering. We compile a new dataset of diagrams with exhaustive annotations of constituents and relationships for over 5,000 diagrams and 15,000 questions and answers. Our results show the significance of our models for syntactic parsing and question answering in diagrams using DPGs.
ERNIE 5.0 leads with 96.9% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 96.9
ERNIE 5.0
- 95.3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)
- 95.3
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking
- 94.7 Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- 94.4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 94.4
Qwen 3.6 Plus
- 94.2 GPT-4o
- 94.0
Command A Vision
- 93.9
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
- 93.7
Mistral Small 3.1
- 93.7
Mistral Medium 3
- 93.3
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- 92.9
Mistral Small 3.2
- 92.9
Qwen3.5-27B
- 92.7
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B
- 92.6
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
- 91.2
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
- 90.2
Qwen3.5-9B
- 89.6
Qwen3.5-4B
- 89.3
STEP3-VL-10B
- 89.2
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B
- 89.1
Seed1.8
- 89.0
EXAONE 4.5 33B
- 88.8 GLM-4.6V
- 88.7 Claude 3 Sonnet
- 88.7
Qwen2.5-VL-72B
- 88.5
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
- 88.1 Claude 3 Opus
- 88.1 GLM-4.5V
- 87.9 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking
- 87.8
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B
- 87.3
Seed1.5-VL
- 87.3
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B
- 87.1
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL
- 86.7 Claude 3 Haiku
- 85.2
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B
- 85.0
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-VL-8B-V1
- 85.0
Cosmos3-Nano
- 84.8
Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B
- 84.5
Gemma 3 27B
- 84.2
Gemma 3 12B
- 83.3
Qwen3.5-2B
- 83.2
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
- 82.3
Phi-4-multimodal
- 80.3
Gemini 1.5 Pro
- 79.5
Gemini 1.0 Ultra
- 78.2 GPT-4
- 78.1 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
- 77.5
North Micro Vision Instruct
- 75.4
Cosmos3-Edge
- 74.8
Gemma 3 4B
- 69.9
Qwen3.5-0.8B
- 1
ERNIE 5.0 96.9%
- 2 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 95.3%
- 3
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-Thinking 95.3%
- 4 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 94.7%
- 5
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 94.4%
- 6
Qwen 3.6 Plus 94.4%
- 7 GPT-4o May 2024 94.2%
- 8
Command A Vision 94%
- 9
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 93.9%
- 10
Mistral Small 3.1 93.7%
- 11
Mistral Medium 3 93.7%
- 12
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.3%
- 13
Mistral Small 3.2 92.9%
- 14
Qwen3.5-27B 92.9%
- 15
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B 92.7%
- 16
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 92.6%
- 17
Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 91.2%
- 18
Qwen3.5-9B 90.2%
- 19
Qwen3.5-4B 89.6%
- 20
STEP3-VL-10B 89.3%
- 21
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 89.2%
- 22
Seed1.8 89.1%
- 23
EXAONE 4.5 33B 89%
- 24 GLM-4.6V 88.8%
- 25 Claude 3 Sonnet 88.7%
- 26
Qwen2.5-VL-72B 88.7%
- 27
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 88.5%
- 28 Claude 3 Opus 88.1%
- 29 GLM-4.5V 88.1%
- 30 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 87.9%
- 31
Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 87.8%
- 32
Seed1.5-VL 87.3%
- 33
InternVL3.5-241B-A28B 87.3%
- 34
Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL 87.1%
- 35 Claude 3 Haiku 86.7%
- 36
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B 85.2%
- 37
Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Nano-VL-8B-V1 85%
- 38
Cosmos3-Nano 85%
- 39
Phi-4-Reasoning-Vision-15B 84.8%
- 40
Gemma 3 27B 84.5%
- 41
Gemma 3 12B 84.2%
- 42
Qwen3.5-2B 83.3%
- 43
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 83.2%
- 44
Phi-4-multimodal 82.3%
- 45
Gemini 1.5 Pro Feb 2024 80.3%
- 46
Gemini 1.0 Ultra 79.5%
- 47 GPT-4 Mar 2023 78.2%
- 48 Phi-3.5-vision-instruct 78.1%
- 49
North Micro Vision Instruct 77.5%
- 50
Cosmos3-Edge 75.4%
- 51
Gemma 3 4B 74.8%
- 52
Qwen3.5-0.8B 69.9%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 96.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 95.3% | Oct 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 95.3% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 94.7% | Jun 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 94.4% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | | 94.4% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 94.2% | May 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | | 94% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 93.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | | 93.7% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 11 | | 93.7% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 93.3% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 13 | | 92.9% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 14 | | 92.9% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 92.7% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 16 | | 92.6% | Feb 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 17 | | 91.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 18 | | 90.2% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 19 | | 89.6% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 20 | | 89.3% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 21 | | 89.2% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | | 89.1% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 23 | | 89% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | GLM-4.6V | 88.8% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 25 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 88.7% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 26 | | 88.7% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | | 88.5% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 28 | Claude 3 Opus | 88.1% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 29 | GLM-4.5V | 88.1% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 30 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 87.9% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 31 | | 87.8% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 32 | | 87.3% | May 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 33 | | 87.3% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 34 | | 87.1% | Oct 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 35 | Claude 3 Haiku | 86.7% | Mar 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 36 | | 85.2% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 37 | | 85% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 38 | | 85% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 39 | | 84.8% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 40 | | 84.5% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 41 | | 84.2% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 42 | | 83.3% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 43 | | 83.2% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 44 | | 82.3% | Feb 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 45 | | 80.3% | Feb 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 46 | | 79.5% | Dec 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 47 | GPT-4 Mar 2023 | 78.2% | Mar 2023 | Lab model card | |
| 48 | Phi-3.5-vision-instruct | 78.1% | Aug 2024 | Lab model card | |
| 49 | | 77.5% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 50 | | 75.4% | May 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 51 | | 74.8% | Mar 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 52 | | 69.9% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card |
9 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since 2023
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Anthropic’s own number for Claude 3 Sonnet passed 85% in March 2024
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in August 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | 77.5 | AI2D_TEST | |
| May 25, 2026 | 87.8 | AI2D_TEST | |
| Apr 15, 2026 | 92.7 | AI2D_TEST | |
| Apr 9, 2026 | 89 | AI2D | |
| Apr 2, 2026 | 94.4 | AI2D_TEST | |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 91.2 | AI2D_TEST | |
| Mar 4, 2026 | 84.8 | AI2D_TEST (default mode) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 69.9 | AI2D_TEST 69.9/68.7 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 83.3 | AI2D_TEST 83.3/81.5 (with CI / without CI) | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 89.6 | AI2D_TEST | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | 90.2 | AI2D_TEST | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 92.6 | AI2D_TEST | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 92.9 | AI2D_TEST | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | 93.3 | AI2D_TEST | |
| Feb 16, 2026 | 93.9 | AI2D_TEST | |
| Feb 6, 2026 | 96.9 | AI2D | |
| Jan 13, 2026 | 89.3 | AI2D | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 89.1 | AI2D | |
| Dec 8, 2025 | GLM-4.6V | 88.8 | AI2D |
| Nov 11, 2025 | 95.3 | AI2D (transparent) | |
| Oct 28, 2025 | 87.1 | AI2D (test) | |
| Sep 23, 2025 | 89.2 | AI2D_TEST | |
| Sep 22, 2025 | 85.2 | AI2D | |
| Aug 25, 2025 | 87.3 | AI2D (w/ mask) | |
| Aug 11, 2025 | GLM-4.5V | 88.1 | AI2D |
| Jul 31, 2025 | 94 | AI2D | |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking | 87.9 | AI2D |
| Jun 20, 2025 | 92.9 | AI2D | |
| Jun 3, 2025 | 85 | AI2D | |
| May 12, 2025 | 87.3 | AI2D | |
| May 7, 2025 | 93.7 | AI2D 0-shot | |
| Mar 27, 2025 | 83.2 | AI2D | |
| Mar 17, 2025 | 93.7 | AI2D | |
| Mar 12, 2025 | 84.5 | AI2D (IT); PT = 79.0 | |
| Feb 26, 2025 | 82.3 | AI2D | |
| Jan 28, 2025 | 88.4 | AI2D_TEST | |
| Oct 22, 2024 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 95.3 | AI2D (test) |
| Jun 20, 2024 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 94.7 | AI2D (test) |
| May 14, 2024 | 94.4 | Ai2D (test), 0-shot | |
| May 13, 2024 | GPT-4o | 94.2 | AI2D (%) (test) |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Opus | 88.1 | AI2D (test) |
| Feb 15, 2024 | 80.3 | Ai2D (test), 0-shot | |
| Dec 6, 2023 | 79.5 | AI2D (test) | |
| Mar 14, 2023 | GPT-4 | 78.2 | AI2 Diagram (AI2D) Accuracy (test) 0-shot |
30 system cards report it, from 12 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2026 | | 87.8 | AI2D_TEST (Figure 5, printed value) | Capabilities |
| May 31, 2026 | | 85 | AI2D, Cosmos3-Nano 8B column, Table 10 | Capabilities |
| May 31, 2026 | | 75.4 | AI2D, Cosmos3-Edge 2B column, Table 10 | Capabilities |
| Apr 27, 2026 | | 88.5 | AI2D (Test), 88.5 with reasoning on and off (Table 7) | Capabilities |
| Apr 17, 2026 | | 91.2 | AI2D_TEST (Table 6) | Capabilities |
| Apr 9, 2026 | | 89 | AI2D (Table 2, Reasoning mode) | Capabilities |
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 89.1 | AI2D (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Mar 4, 2026 | | 84.8 | AI2D TEST, default mode, 84.7 force nothink, 79.7 force thinking (Tables 5 and 6) | Capabilities |
| Feb 4, 2026 | | 96.9 | AI2D (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Jan 14, 2026 | | 89.3 | AI2D, SeRe (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| Jan 1, 2026 | GLM-4.6V technical report | 88.8 | AI2D, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Nov 26, 2025 | | 89.2 | AI2D w. M. (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Nov 6, 2025 | | 84.7 | AI2D (Test), reasoning on (Table 3). Reasoning off 87.2 | Capabilities |
| Sep 22, 2025 | | 85.2 | AI2D w.M., Instruct (Table 9). Thinking 86.1 (Table 10) | Capabilities |
| Aug 25, 2025 | | 87.3 | AI2D (w/ mask) (Table 2). Without mask 95.0 (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Aug 13, 2025 | GLM-4.5V technical report | 88.1 | AI2D, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Jul 1, 2025 | GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report | 87.9 | AI2D, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| May 11, 2025 | | 87.3 | AI2D, thinking (Table 6). Non-thinking 88.5 | Capabilities |
| Mar 26, 2025 | | 83.2 | AI2D (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 74.8 | AI2D, IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 84.5 | AI2D, IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
| Mar 25, 2025 | | 84.2 | AI2D, IT, P&S applied (Table 16) | Capabilities |
| Mar 3, 2025 | | 82.3 | AI2D (test) (Table 1). Speech-prompt ShareGPT4o AI2D 68.9 (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Feb 19, 2025 | | 88.7 | AI2D w. M. (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Oct 22, 2024 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) model card | 95.3 | AI2D (test), 0-shot (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Aug 30, 2024 | | 78.1 | AI2D (test) (Table 5) | Capabilities |
| Jun 20, 2024 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet model card | 94.7 | AI2D (test), 0-shot (Table 2) | Capabilities |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Sonnet model card | 88.7 | AI2D (test), 0-shot. The text of 5.3 gives 89.2 (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Opus model card | 88.1 | AI2D (test), 0-shot. The text of 5.3 gives 88.3 (Table 3) | Capabilities |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Claude 3 Haiku model card | 86.7 | AI2D (test), 0-shot. The text of 5.3 gives 80.6 (Table 3) | Capabilities |
More in Vision
- MMMU In use 11.5K college-level multimodal questions across 30 subjects. Multiple-choice and open accuracy. GPT-5.1 85.4%
- MMMU-Pro In use Harder MMMU: college-level multimodal questions with more options and vision-only inputs to remove text shortcuts. GPT-5.6 Sol 84.6%
- CharXiv In use Chart understanding on real arXiv figures. Reasoning questions require synthesizing information from complex charts. Claude Fable 5 93.5%
- MATH-Vision (MathVision) In use 3,040 competition math problems with visual context. Answer accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 97.7%
- MMStar In use Models answer 1,500 human-curated image questions that cannot be solved without the image, across 6 core capabilities. Scored by accuracy.
Qwen 3.8 Max 85.9%
- ChartQA In use Models answer human-written and generated questions about chart images that need visual and arithmetic reasoning. Scored by relaxed accuracy with a 5 percent numeric tolerance.
Command A Vision 90.9%