Benchmark Almanac

ASIMOV v1

Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 84.3% tops its leaderboard
Not in model cards

Models judge whether robot actions in scenes generated from real images and hospital injury reports are undesirable or unsafe. Scored by alignment with human labels.

Released with robot constitutions work. Accepted at CoRL 2025. ASIMOV-2.0 (September 2025) replaced its data with new image, video and constraint sets.

Made by
Google DeepMind
Released
March 2025
Kind
Embodied reasoning
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public

In the authors’ words

Until recently, robotics safety research was predominantly about collision avoidance and hazard reduction in the immediate vicinity of a robot. Since the advent of large vision and language models (VLMs), robots are now also capable of higher-level semantic scene understanding and natural language interactions with humans. Despite their known vulnerabilities (e.g. hallucinations or jail-breaking), VLMs are being handed control of robots capable of physical contact with the real world. This can lead to dangerous behaviors, making semantic safety for robots a matter of immediate concern. Our contributions in this paper are two fold: first, to address these emerging risks, we release the ASIMOV Benchmark, a large-scale and comprehensive collection of datasets for evaluating and improving semantic safety of foundation models serving as robot brains. Our data generation recipe is highly scalable: by leveraging text and image generation techniques, we generate undesirable situations from real-world visual scenes and human injury reports from hospitals. Secondly, we develop a framework to automatically generate robot constitutions from real-world data to steer a robot's behavior using Constitutional AI mechanisms. We propose a novel auto-amending process that is able to introduce nuances in written rules of behavior; this can lead to increased alignment with human preferences on behavior desirability and safety. We explore trade-offs between generality and specificity across a diverse set of constitutions of different lengths, and demonstrate that a robot is able to effectively reject unconstitutional actions. We measure a top alignment rate of 84.3% on the ASIMOV Benchmark using generated constitutions, outperforming no-constitution baselines and human-written constitutions. Data is available at asimov-benchmark.github.io

Abstract of Generating Robot Constitutions & Benchmarks for Semantic Safety (arXiv:2503.08663, CC0)
1
Entries on its own leaderboard, 0 models we track

Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 84.3%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) Robot-Constitution128 - AutoMerge - AutoAmend10 (297,982 characters) 84.3%

Source: Official ASIMOV v1 leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 1.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 84.3% Robot-Constitution128 - AutoMerge - AutoAmend10 (297,982 characters) Official leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

Versions

More in Robotics

All 104 in Robotics
  • ERQA In use 400 multiple-choice visual questions from robot and egocentric footage on spatial, trajectory, action and state reasoning. Accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 78.5%
  • RoboDojo In use Generalist manipulation policies run 42 Isaac Sim tasks and 18 remote real-robot tasks. Scored by task score and success rate. GPT-6 Astra 29%
  • RoboLab In use Zero-shot DROID Franka policies in Isaac Lab on 120 tabletop tasks at three instruction levels, 10 episodes each. Success rate. FLUX 3 Action 42.9%
  • Progress classification (Google DeepMind) In use Models assign each frame of a robot video to one of five task-progress bands from 0 to 100 percent. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 57.4%
  • Human proximity (Google DeepMind robotics) In use Models judge from robot camera views whether a human is within 1 meter, a spatial awareness check for safe robot behavior. Scored by accuracy. Gemini Robotics ER 2 93%
  • Moment finding (Google DeepMind) In use Models find the moment in a robot video when an event happens. Scored by accuracy and mean absolute time distance in seconds. Gemini Robotics ER 2 91.3%