Benchmark Almanac

BigO(Bench)

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B 41.4% leads since March 2025
Only in system cards

Models predict the time and space complexity of Python solutions and write solutions that meet a required complexity. Uses 3,105 Code Contests problems with profiled complexity labels.

Models report all@1, pass@1 and best@1 for prediction and generation tasks, with no single overall score.

Made by
Meta FAIR
Released
March 2025
Kind
Speed and optimization
Level
Competition
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
QwQ-32B #135 on the capability index
Last in a system card
September 2025
Last model added
September 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce BigO(Bench), a novel coding benchmark designed to evaluate the capabilities of generative language models in understanding and generating code with specified time and space complexities. This benchmark addresses the gap in current evaluations that often overlook the ability of models to comprehend and produce code constrained by computational complexity. BigO(Bench) includes tooling to infer the algorithmic complexity of any Python function from profiling measurements, including human- or LLM-generated solutions. BigO(Bench) also includes of set of 3,105 coding problems and 1,190,250 solutions from Code Contests annotated with inferred (synthetic) time and space complexity labels from the complexity framework, as well as corresponding runtime and memory footprint values for a large set of input sizes. We present results from evaluating multiple state-of-the-art language models on this benchmark, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses in handling complexity requirements. In particular, token-space reasoning models are unrivaled in code generation but not in complexity understanding, hinting that they may not generalize well to tasks for which no reward was given at training time.

Abstract of BigO(Bench): Can LLMs Generate Code with Controlled Time and Space Complexity? (arXiv:2503.15242, CC0)
20
Entries on its own leaderboard, 18 models we track
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads with 41.4% among models released by April 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B 41.4%
  2. 2 DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 41.1%
  3. 3 Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1 41.1%
  4. 4 QwQ-32B 40.4%
  5. 5 Llama 3.1-405B 38.3%
  6. 6 Gemma 3 27B 37.6%
  7. 7 openhands-lm-32b-v0.1 36%
  8. 8 o1-mini 35.6%
  9. 9 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 34.9%
  10. 10 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 34.2%
  11. 11 Llama 3.1-70B 33.8%
  12. 12 Llama 3.3 70B 33.7%
  13. 13 Codestral 22B 33.5%
  14. 14 GPT-4o Mar 2025 33.1%
  15. 15 Llama 4 Maverick 32.8%
  16. 16 DeepCoder Preview* 14B 32.3%
  17. 17 DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B 29.6%
  18. 18 DeepSeek-V3 27.1%
  19. 19 Llama 4 Scout 23%
  20. 20 Llama 3.1-8B 21.8%

Source: Official BigO(Bench) leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B 41.4% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
2 DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 41.1% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1 41.1% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
4 QwQ-32B 40.4% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Llama 3.1-405B 38.3% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Gemma 3 27B 37.6% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
7 openhands-lm-32b-v0.1 36% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
8 o1-mini 35.6% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 34.9% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
10 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 34.2% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Llama 3.1-70B 33.8% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Llama 3.3 70B 33.7% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Codestral 22B 33.5% Official leaderboard
14 GPT-4o Mar 2025 33.1% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Llama 4 Maverick 32.8% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
16 DeepCoder Preview* 14B 32.3% Official leaderboard
17 DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B 29.6% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
18 DeepSeek-V3 27.1% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Llama 4 Scout 23% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Llama 3.1-8B 21.8% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

DeepSeek
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2025

Source: Official BigO(Bench) leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B Llama 3.1-405B openhands-lm-32b-v0.1 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B openhands-lm-32b-v0.1

Source: Official BigO(Bench) leaderboard

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 30, 2025 Code World Model (CWM) technical report BigO(Bench), no overall score: time complexity prediction all@1 41.3, space 12.3, time generation code-only pass@1 76.1, space generation code-only pass@1 73.2 (Table 11) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471