Benchmark Almanac

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout ranks first on TextQuests.

Meta Released April 5th, 2025 Compare with others
94
Benchmarks with a score
1
Ranked first, out of five or more models
2
In the top three
Meta Apr 2025

Llama 4 Scout

Open weights

127.7 #163 of 256
Epoch Capabilities Index
Self-Reported Index 123.6 #326 of 404
  • MMMU-Pro 52.2% #76 /90
  • ZeroBench 3.00% #58 /76
  • GPQA Diamond 51.8% #152 /229

Where it ranks

Its best score on each benchmark, and where that ranks among every model with a score there. We rank each model once, at its best setting.

Knowledge and language

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MGSM 90.6% #10 of 57 Lab model card
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (2025 dataset) 7.70% #38 of 104 Official leaderboard
BullshitBench 36.4% #40 of 107 Official leaderboard
SnorkelSpatial 15.4% #14 of 27 Official leaderboard
MMLU 79.6% #78 of 131 Lab model card
IFEval 81.8% #36 of 60 Official leaderboard
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard (HHEM) 4.70% #89 of 148 Official leaderboard
LMArena (Elo) 1,322 #209 of 335 Official leaderboard
Phare 63.8% #39 of 62 Official leaderboard
MMLU-Pro 74.3% #110 of 167 Lab model card
SEA-HELM 63.4 #47 of 71 Official leaderboard
BullshitBench V2 20% #92 of 129 Official leaderboard
HELM Arabic 75.6 #21 of 28 Official leaderboard
HELM Arabic Enterprise 62.1 #18 of 23 Official leaderboard
Seal-0 0% #9 of 11 Official leaderboard
WritingBench 52.0 #38 of 45 Official leaderboard
Fiction.LiveBench 36% #53 of 57 Fiction.live leaderboard, via Epoch AI
Creative Writing v3 46.6 #113 of 120 Official leaderboard
EQ-Bench 3 670 #74 of 78 Official leaderboard
Longform Creative Writing (EQ-Bench) 31.1 #113 of 119 Official leaderboard
StudyArena Text 1,159 #81 of 85 Official leaderboard
MTOB 42.2 #3 of 3 Lab model card
TydiQA 31.5% #2 of 2 Lab model card

Math and science

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MATH Level 5 62.3% #42 of 94 Epoch AI run
GPQA Main 50.7% #35 of 60 Official leaderboard
SnorkelSequences 48.4% #15 of 25 Official leaderboard
Misguided Attention 35.9% #29 of 45 Official leaderboard
GPQA Diamond 51.8% #152 of 229 Epoch AI run
MATH 50.3% #69 of 99 Lab model card
SnorkelGraph 26% #19 of 24 Official leaderboard
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 7.78% #168 of 212 Epoch AI run
HiPhO 29.9% #29 of 36 Official leaderboard
PolyMath 20.9% #31 of 38 Official leaderboard
DTBench 57.9% #148 of 180 Official leaderboard
MATH-500 79.2% #32 of 38 Official leaderboard
IneqMath 1.50% #30 of 34 Official leaderboard
ForecastBench 0.17 #74 of 82 Official leaderboard
SGI-Bench 21.1% #14 of 15 Official leaderboard
ARC-AGI-2 0% #93 of 98 Official leaderboard
ARC-AGI 0.50% #94 of 95 Official leaderboard
FrontierMath 0% #70 of 70 Epoch AI run
SciArena 830 #34 of 34 Official leaderboard

Coding

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
SArena 0.84 #5 of 17 Official leaderboard
MBPP 67.8% #48 of 71 Lab model card
BigCodeBench-Hard 16.9% #68 of 96 Official leaderboard
LiveSQLBench 18.9% #28 of 36 Official leaderboard
LiveCodeBench v5 32.8% #43 of 47 Lab model card
BigO(Bench) 23% #17 of 18 Official leaderboard
SWE-bench Verified 9.06% #57 of 60 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Website 743 #151 of 151 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Code 780 #143 of 143 Official leaderboard
DesignArena Game Dev 763 #143 of 143 Official leaderboard
DesignArena UI Component 759 #139 of 139 Official leaderboard

Agents and tools

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
TextQuests 7.00 #1 of 28 Official leaderboard
SnakeBench 21 #123 of 188 Official leaderboard
BFCL V4 28.1% #43 of 65 Official leaderboard
LisanBench 126.3 #109 of 133 Official leaderboard
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) 45.4% #57 of 67 Official leaderboard
LLM Chess -402 #107 of 123 Official leaderboard
PinchBench 2.0 3.19% #57 of 57 Official leaderboard
Galileo Agent Leaderboard 0.63 #29 of 29 Official leaderboard

Professional work

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MultiFinBen 20.9 #2 of 9 Official leaderboard
BizFinBench 61.2% #8 of 13 Official leaderboard
SnorkelUnderwrite 44.3% #21 of 27 Official leaderboard
MortgageTax 57.8% #68 of 87 Official leaderboard
LegalBench 72% #109 of 138 Official leaderboard
CorpFin v2 46.8% #100 of 119 Official leaderboard
TaxEval v2 55.2% #123 of 129 Official leaderboard
MedCode 23.3% #93 of 96 Official leaderboard
ProfBench 31.2% #71 of 72 Official leaderboard
MedScribe 50.6% #96 of 97 Official leaderboard

Vision, audio and robotics

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
MMMU 69.4% #35 of 136 Official leaderboard
ChartQA 88.8% #11 of 37 Lab model card
SpatialViz-Bench 34.2% #4 of 8 Claim in arxiv.org, via Epoch AI
MathVista 70.7% #46 of 70 Lab model card
VHELM 38.0 #30 of 41 Official leaderboard
ZeroBench 3.00% #58 of 76 Official leaderboard
Vision Arena 1,128 #107 of 136 Official leaderboard
MeasureBench Real-world 10.9% #15 of 19 Official leaderboard
MeasureBench Synthetic 9.10% #15 of 19 Official leaderboard
MMMU-Pro 52.2% #76 of 90 Lab model card
RoboRewardBench 1.49 #21 of 22 Official leaderboard

Safety and security

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
SimpleSafetyTests 97% #56 of 75 Official leaderboard
HELM Safety 87.3 #57 of 75 Official leaderboard
AIRTBench 1.00% #7 of 9 Official leaderboard
AIR-Bench 2024 52.3% #64 of 82 Official leaderboard
nocot-bench (NCRI) 57.7 #146 of 185 Official leaderboard
Anthropic Red Team 96.5% #64 of 75 Official leaderboard
KORA 17.7% #37 of 42 Official leaderboard

Other

BenchmarkScoreRankSource
HELM Capabilities 64.4 #33 of 60 Official leaderboard
ACCoRD 49.7 #114 of 152 Official leaderboard
SAGE (Vals) 34.8% #69 of 81 Official leaderboard
Conceptual Reasoning Index 23.1 #132 of 151 Official leaderboard
LMCA 12% #131 of 147 Official leaderboard

Its lab's numbers put it at 123.6, 4.0 points below its ECI

The Self-Reported Index fits one score to the 11 capability results Meta reported for this model, on the scale of the Epoch Capabilities Index. Labs choose which benchmarks to show and how to run them, so read it as the lab's claim, not an independent measurement. The 90% interval runs from 120.2 to 127.1. How we compute it.

Its lab's numbers next to 3 leaderboards

Where the benchmark's own leaderboard, or Epoch AI's run, also has this model. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every pair.

Benchmark Lab says Board says Gap
GPQA Diamond 57.2% GPQA Diamond 51.8% Epoch AI run +5.4 pts
MMLU-Pro 74.3% MMLU Pro, 0-shot, macro_avg/acc 74.3% Leaderboard Same
MMMU 69.4% MMMU, 0-shot, accuracy 69.4% Leaderboard Same

Meta's models over time

Meta's models in color, against every other model on the Epoch Capabilities Index, by release date.

50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Muse Spark Open Llama 4 Maverick Llama 3.2 90B Llama 3.1-8B Llama 2-13B Llama 2-70B Llama 2-7B 50 100 150 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Muse Spark Open Llama 4 Maverick

Source: Epoch Capabilities Index, Epoch AI (CC BY 4.0)

Its launch post

The benchmarks the lab chose to headline, with the scores it gave.

Its system card

Every result in the longer documents the lab published with it. 1 of them isn't in the launch post.