Business Operation (Moonshot)
Agents manage a simulated business over a long horizon and make operating decisions. Moonshot reports a percentage score.
In-house finance benchmark. The scoring method is not described, so the scoring field is a guess.
- Made by
- Moonshot AI
- Released
- October 2026
- Kind
- Running a business
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Settled by events
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- Kept private
- Strongest model tested
- Kimi K3.1 Pro #16 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- October 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads with 37.8%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads with 37% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads with 37.8%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 1 Kimi K3.1 Pro 37.8%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 Kimi K3.1 Pro 37%
- 2 Kimi K3 8.90%
Source: Official Business Operation (Moonshot) leaderboard
- 1 Kimi K3.1 Pro 37.8%
- 2 Kimi K3 8.90%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official Business Operation (Moonshot) leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 37.8% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 37% | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | Kimi K3 | 8.90% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 37.8% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Kimi K3 | 8.90% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 2 models. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official Business Operation (Moonshot) leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2026 | Kimi K3.1 Pro | 37.8 | Business Operation (Internal) |
One lab claim next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 37.8% Business Operation (Internal) | 37% Leaderboard | +0.8 pts |
More in Economic work
- JobBench In use 130 tasks from 35 occupations workers most want delegated. Agent works through messy reference files, graded by fact-anchored binary rubrics. GLM-5.3 61.4%
- GDPval In use Real work tasks from 44 occupations with reference files. Experts blindly compare model deliverables with expert work. Metric is win-or-tie rate.
Seed2.1 Pro 87.9%
- GDPval-AA v2.1 In use Agents with shell and web access complete 220 GDPval gold tasks from 44 occupations. Blind pairwise comparisons give Elo ratings. Claude Opus 5.5 1,846
- AA-Briefcase v1.1 In use Version 1.1 of Artificial Analysis's multi-hour office work evaluation, with Elo ratings fitted by Crowd-BT. Claude Opus 5.5 1,822
- CoWorkBench In use Agent completes long-horizon productivity tasks across computer science, finance, law and medicine. Qwen in-house scoring (method unpublished). Claude Fable 5 75.9%
- OfficeQA In use Grounded reasoning over a large corpus of U.S. Treasury Bulletin documents: locate tables and compute precise numeric answers. Claude Opus 4.7 86.3%