Benchmark Almanac

ChemBench

NexusSciAgent 86% tops its leaderboard Claude Opus 4.7 70.9% leads the models we track
Intern-S1 83.4% leads since July 2025
Dropped

Models answer more than 2,700 chemistry questions on knowledge and reasoning. Results are compared with a group of human chemists.

A smaller ChemBench-Mini subset is common for cheaper runs.

Released
April 2024
Kind
Science questions
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Short answer
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude Opus 4.8 #21 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
July 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
May 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Large language models (LLMs) have gained widespread interest due to their ability to process human language and perform tasks on which they have not been explicitly trained. However, we possess only a limited systematic understanding of the chemical capabilities of LLMs, which would be required to improve models and mitigate potential harm. Here, we introduce "ChemBench," an automated framework for evaluating the chemical knowledge and reasoning abilities of state-of-the-art LLMs against the expertise of chemists. We curated more than 2,700 question-answer pairs, evaluated leading open- and closed-source LLMs, and found that the best models outperformed the best human chemists in our study on average. However, the models struggle with some basic tasks and provide overconfident predictions. These findings reveal LLMs' impressive chemical capabilities while emphasizing the need for further research to improve their safety and usefulness. They also suggest adapting chemistry education and show the value of benchmarking frameworks for evaluating LLMs in specific domains.

Abstract of Are large language models superhuman chemists? (arXiv:2404.01475, CC0)
68
Entries on its own leaderboard, 24 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

NexusSciAgent tops the leaderboard with 86%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude Opus 4.7, at 70.9%.

Intern-S1 leads with 83.4%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in May 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

68 entries. Scroll sideways for the rest.

  1. 86.0 NexusSciAgent
  2. 71.2 NexusSciAgent_DeepSeek
  3. 70.9 Claude Opus 4.7
  4. 67.3 Claude Opus 4.8
  5. 67.2 Kimi K2.5
  6. 65.7 deepseek-chat1
  7. 65.5 Claude Opus 4.5
  8. 65.3 DeepSeek-V3.2
  9. 64.8 Haiyue-Ch1
  10. 64.5 meta-llama/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
  11. 64.3 o1-preview
  12. 64.1 Gemini 2.5 Flash
  13. 63.7 DeepSeek R1 (snapshot unspecified)
  14. 63.4 GPT-5 nano
  15. 63.1 gpt-oss-120b
  16. 62.5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified)
  17. 62.5 DeepSeek-V3-0324-W8A8-1
  18. 62.5 Claude-3.5 (Sonnet) React
  19. 62.1 deepseek-v3-1-w4a8-1
  20. 61.8 DeepSeek-V3-0324-MTP1
  21. 61.2 gpt-oss-20b
  22. 61.1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
  23. 61.1 Qwen3-235B-A22B-2507
  24. 61.0 Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B
  25. 59.8 K2-Horizon-7B
  26. 59.7 Kimi K2
  27. 59.3 GLM-5
  28. 57.9 Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct
  29. 57.0 Mistral Large 2
  30. 57.0 Claude 3 Opus
  31. 56.9 PaperQA2
  32. 55.3 NVIDIA Nemotron Super 3 120B
  33. 53.4 Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct
  34. 52.9 Qwen2.5-32B
  35. 51.8 Llama-3-70B-Instruct
  36. 51.6 Llama-3-70B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0)
  37. 51.1 Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0)
  38. 50.5 GPT-4o React
  39. 50.3 GPT-4o mini
  40. 50.0 Claude 3 Haiku
  41. 48.2 Gemma-2-9B-it
  42. 48.0 Gemma-2-9B-it (Temperature 1.0)
  43. 47.5 phi-3-medium 14B
  44. 47.4 Claude 2
  45. 47.2 NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 3 30B
  46. 47.2 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
  47. 46.6 ChemPile-LoRA-Ensemble
  48. 46.6 GPT-3.5 Turbo (snapshot unspecified)
  49. 46.1 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0)
  50. 45.7 Llama-3-8B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0)
  51. 45.5 Llama-3-8B-Instruct
  52. 45.3 Gemini 1.0 Pro
  53. 44.8 Command R+
  54. 43.5 MiniMax-M2.5
  55. 42.7 qwen2.5-instruct
  56. 42.6 inspect_file_test
  57. 42.6 inspect_test_2
  58. 42.4 Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct
  59. 42.2 kunlun-70b-1
  60. 41.8 Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct (Temperature 1.0)
  61. 41.3 GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified)
  62. 26.6 Llama-2-70B Chat
  63. 25.5 Llama-2-13B Chat
  64. 21.9 olympiad
  65. 19.2 Gemma 1.1 7B IT
  66. 19.1 Gemma-1.1-7B-it (Temperature 1.0)
  67. 4.02 Llama-2-7b-chat-hf
  68. 1.51 Galactica-120b
  1. 1 NexusSciAgent self-reported, no tools 86%
  2. 2 NexusSciAgent_DeepSeek self-reported, no tools 71.2%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.7 verified, no tools 70.9%
  4. 4 Claude Opus 4.8 verified, no tools 67.3%
  5. 5 Kimi K2.5 verified, no tools 67.2%
  6. 6 deepseek-chat1 self-reported, no tools 65.7%
  7. 7 Claude Opus 4.5 verified, no tools 65.5%
  8. 8 DeepSeek-V3.2 verified, no tools 65.3%
  9. 9 Haiyue-Ch1 self-reported, no tools 64.8%
  10. 10 meta-llama/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct verified, no tools 64.5%
  11. 11 o1-preview verified, no tools 64.3%
  12. 12 Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025, verified, no tools 64.1%
  13. 13 DeepSeek R1 (snapshot unspecified) verified, no tools 63.7%
  14. 14 GPT-5 nano verified, no tools 63.4%
  15. 15 gpt-oss-120b verified, no tools 63.1%
  16. 16 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) verified, no tools 62.5%
  17. 17 DeepSeek-V3-0324-W8A8-1 self-reported, no tools 62.5%
  18. 18 Claude-3.5 (Sonnet) React verified, tools 62.5%
  19. 19 deepseek-v3-1-w4a8-1 self-reported, no tools 62.1%
  20. 20 DeepSeek-V3-0324-MTP1 self-reported, no tools 61.8%
  21. 21 gpt-oss-20b verified, no tools 61.2%
  22. 22 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) verified, no tools 61.1%
  23. 23 Qwen3-235B-A22B-2507 verified, no tools 61.1%
  24. 24 Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B verified, no tools 61%
  25. 25 K2-Horizon-7B self-reported, no tools 59.8%
  26. 26 Kimi K2 Sep 2025, verified, no tools 59.7%
  27. 27 GLM-5 verified, no tools 59.3%
  28. 28 Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct verified, no tools 57.9%
  29. 29 Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024, verified, no tools 57%
  30. 30 Claude 3 Opus verified, no tools 57%
  31. 31 PaperQA2 verified, tools 56.9%
  32. 32 NVIDIA Nemotron Super 3 120B verified, no tools 55.3%
  33. 33 Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct verified, no tools 53.4%
  34. 34 Qwen2.5-32B verified, no tools 52.9%
  35. 35 Llama-3-70B-Instruct verified, no tools 51.8%
  36. 36 Llama-3-70B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 51.6%
  37. 37 Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 51.1%
  38. 38 GPT-4o React verified, tools 50.5%
  39. 39 GPT-4o mini verified, no tools 50.3%
  40. 40 Claude 3 Haiku verified, no tools 50%
  41. 41 Gemma-2-9B-it verified, no tools 48.2%
  42. 42 Gemma-2-9B-it (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 48%
  43. 43 phi-3-medium 14B verified, no tools 47.5%
  44. 44 Claude 2 verified, no tools 47.4%
  45. 45 NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 3 30B verified, no tools 47.2%
  46. 46 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct verified, no tools 47.2%
  47. 47 ChemPile-LoRA-Ensemble verified, no tools 46.6%
  48. 48 GPT-3.5 Turbo (snapshot unspecified) verified, no tools 46.6%
  49. 49 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 46.1%
  50. 50 Llama-3-8B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 45.7%
  51. 51 Llama-3-8B-Instruct verified, no tools 45.5%
  52. 52 Gemini 1.0 Pro verified, no tools 45.3%
  53. 53 Command R+ verified, no tools 44.8%
  54. 54 MiniMax-M2.5 verified, no tools 43.5%
  55. 55 qwen2.5-instruct verified, no tools 42.7%
  56. 56 inspect_file_test verified, no tools 42.6%
  57. 57 inspect_test_2 verified, no tools 42.6%
  58. 58 Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct verified, no tools 42.4%
  59. 59 kunlun-70b-1 verified, no tools 42.2%
  60. 60 Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 41.8%
  61. 61 GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) verified, no tools 41.3%
  62. 62 Llama-2-70B Chat verified, no tools 26.6%
  63. 63 Llama-2-13B Chat verified, no tools 25.5%
  64. 64 olympiad verified, no tools 21.9%
  65. 65 Gemma 1.1 7B IT verified, no tools 19.2%
  66. 66 Gemma-1.1-7B-it (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 19.1%
  67. 67 Llama-2-7b-chat-hf verified, no tools 4.02%
  68. 68 Galactica-120b verified, no tools 1.51%

Source: Official ChemBench leaderboard

Sources: Labs’ model cards and official ChemBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 NexusSciAgent 86% self-reported, no tools Official leaderboard
2 NexusSciAgent_DeepSeek 71.2% self-reported, no tools Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.7 70.9% verified, no tools Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Opus 4.8 67.3% verified, no tools May 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Kimi K2.5 67.2% verified, no tools Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
6 deepseek-chat1 65.7% self-reported, no tools Official leaderboard
7 Claude Opus 4.5 65.5% verified, no tools Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
8 DeepSeek-V3.2 65.3% verified, no tools Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Haiyue-Ch1 64.8% self-reported, no tools Official leaderboard
10 meta-llama/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct 64.5% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
11 o1-preview 64.3% verified, no tools Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025 64.1% verified, no tools Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
13 DeepSeek R1 (snapshot unspecified) 63.7% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
14 GPT-5 nano 63.4% verified, no tools Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
15 gpt-oss-120b 63.1% verified, no tools Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 62.5% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
17 DeepSeek-V3-0324-W8A8-1 62.5% self-reported, no tools Official leaderboard
18 Claude-3.5 (Sonnet) React 62.5% verified, tools, ReAct-style harness: interleaves chain-of-thought reasoning with tool-use actions, observing each tool's result before deciding the next step, rather than answering in a single forward pass. Yao et al. 2022, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629 Official leaderboard
19 deepseek-v3-1-w4a8-1 62.1% self-reported, no tools Official leaderboard
20 DeepSeek-V3-0324-MTP1 61.8% self-reported, no tools Official leaderboard
21 gpt-oss-20b 61.2% verified, no tools Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
22 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 61.1% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
23 Qwen3-235B-A22B-2507 61.1% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
24 Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B 61% verified, no tools Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
25 K2-Horizon-7B 59.8% self-reported, no tools Official leaderboard
26 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 59.7% verified, no tools Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
27 GLM-5 59.3% verified, no tools Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
28 Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct 57.9% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
29 Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 57% verified, no tools Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
30 Claude 3 Opus 57% verified, no tools Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
31 PaperQA2 56.9% verified, tools, PaperQA agent: retrieval-augmented QA over full-text scientific literature. It retrieves candidate papers/passages, assesses their relevance, gathers evidence, and synthesizes a cited answer — iterating retrieval and evidence steps rather than answering in one shot. Lála et al. 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07559 Official leaderboard
32 NVIDIA Nemotron Super 3 120B 55.3% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
33 Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct 53.4% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
34 Qwen2.5-32B 52.9% verified, no tools Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
35 Llama-3-70B-Instruct 51.8% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
36 Llama-3-70B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) 51.6% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
37 Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) 51.1% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
38 GPT-4o React 50.5% verified, tools, ReAct-style harness: interleaves chain-of-thought reasoning with tool-use actions, observing each tool's result before deciding the next step, rather than answering in a single forward pass. Yao et al. 2022, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629 Official leaderboard
39 GPT-4o mini 50.3% verified, no tools Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
40 Claude 3 Haiku 50% verified, no tools Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
41 Gemma-2-9B-it 48.2% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
42 Gemma-2-9B-it (Temperature 1.0) 48% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
43 phi-3-medium 14B 47.5% verified, no tools Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
44 Claude 2 47.4% verified, no tools Jul 2023 Official leaderboard
45 NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 3 30B 47.2% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
46 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 47.2% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
47 ChemPile-LoRA-Ensemble 46.6% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
48 GPT-3.5 Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 46.6% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
49 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) 46.1% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
50 Llama-3-8B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) 45.7% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
51 Llama-3-8B-Instruct 45.5% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
52 Gemini 1.0 Pro 45.3% verified, no tools Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
53 Command R+ 44.8% verified, no tools Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
54 MiniMax-M2.5 43.5% verified, no tools Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
55 qwen2.5-instruct 42.7% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
56 inspect_file_test 42.6% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
57 inspect_test_2 42.6% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
58 Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct 42.4% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
59 kunlun-70b-1 42.2% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
60 Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) 41.8% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
61 GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) 41.3% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
62 Llama-2-70B Chat 26.6% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
63 Llama-2-13B Chat 25.5% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
64 olympiad 21.9% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
65 Gemma 1.1 7B IT 19.2% verified, no tools Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
66 Gemma-1.1-7B-it (Temperature 1.0) 19.1% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
67 Llama-2-7b-chat-hf 4.02% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
68 Galactica-120b 1.51% verified, no tools Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Intern-S1 83.4% Jul 2025 Lab model card
2 Claude Opus 4.7 70.9% verified, no tools Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.8 67.3% verified, no tools May 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Kimi K2.5 67.2% verified, no tools Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Opus 4.5 65.5% verified, no tools Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
6 DeepSeek-V3.2 65.3% verified, no tools Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
7 o1-preview 64.3% verified, no tools Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025 64.1% verified, no tools Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5 nano 63.4% verified, no tools Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
10 gpt-oss-120b 63.1% verified, no tools Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
11 gpt-oss-20b 61.2% verified, no tools Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B 61% verified, no tools Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 59.7% verified, no tools Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
14 GLM-5 59.3% verified, no tools Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024 57% verified, no tools Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
16 Claude 3 Opus 57% verified, no tools Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Qwen2.5-32B 52.9% verified, no tools Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
18 GPT-4o mini 50.3% verified, no tools Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Claude 3 Haiku 50% verified, no tools Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
20 phi-3-medium 14B 47.5% verified, no tools Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
21 Claude 2 47.4% verified, no tools Jul 2023 Official leaderboard
22 Gemini 1.0 Pro 45.3% verified, no tools Dec 2023 Official leaderboard
23 Command R+ 44.8% verified, no tools Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
24 MiniMax-M2.5 43.5% verified, no tools Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
25 Gemma 1.1 7B IT 19.2% verified, no tools Apr 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

5 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in April 2024 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic OpenAI Moonshot AI
Own leaderboard Not tested since May 2026

Source: Official ChemBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Intern-S1 o1-preview Claude 3 Opus Claude 2 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Intern-S1 o1-preview

Sources: Official ChemBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since July 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Shanghai AI Lab
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jul 24, 2025 Intern-S1 83.4 ChemBench

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Aug 21, 2025 Intern-S1 technical report 83.4 ChemBench, Mirza et al. (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Science and reasoning

All 92 in Science and reasoning
  • GPQA Diamond In use 198 graduate-level 'Google-proof' multiple-choice questions in biology, chemistry and physics. Gemini 4 Carbon 96.5%
  • Terminal-Bench-Science In use 70 scientific research-workflow tasks across five science areas, run in Harbor containers. Hidden tests give the resolution rate. GPT-6 Astra 68.1%
  • FrontierScience In use Models solve physics, chemistry, and biology problems in an Olympiad track graded by short answer and a Research track graded by 10-point rubrics. Intern-S2-397B 87%
  • BioMysteryBench In use Bioinformatics problems on anonymized real datasets that require real analysis with tools. Rubric-graded, with human-solvable and human-difficult splits. Claude Fable 5.2 83.7%
  • HiPhO In use Models solve theory problems from 2024 and 2025 physics olympiad exams, some with diagrams. Official marking schemes grade answers and steps, mapped to medal levels. Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
  • LABBench2 In use 11 biology research sub-tasks (literature, figures, tables, patents, trials and more) with tool access. Macro-averaged accuracy. GPT-5.2 60.9%