ChemBench
Models answer more than 2,700 chemistry questions on knowledge and reasoning. Results are compared with a group of human chemists.
A smaller ChemBench-Mini subset is common for cheaper runs.
- Released
- April 2024
- Kind
- Science questions
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Opus 4.8 #21 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- July 2025, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- May 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large language models (LLMs) have gained widespread interest due to their ability to process human language and perform tasks on which they have not been explicitly trained. However, we possess only a limited systematic understanding of the chemical capabilities of LLMs, which would be required to improve models and mitigate potential harm. Here, we introduce "ChemBench," an automated framework for evaluating the chemical knowledge and reasoning abilities of state-of-the-art LLMs against the expertise of chemists. We curated more than 2,700 question-answer pairs, evaluated leading open- and closed-source LLMs, and found that the best models outperformed the best human chemists in our study on average. However, the models struggle with some basic tasks and provide overconfident predictions. These findings reveal LLMs' impressive chemical capabilities while emphasizing the need for further research to improve their safety and usefulness. They also suggest adapting chemistry education and show the value of benchmarking frameworks for evaluating LLMs in specific domains.
NexusSciAgent tops the leaderboard with 86%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude Opus 4.7, at 70.9%.
Intern-S1 leads with 83.4%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in May 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 86.0 NexusSciAgent
- 71.2 NexusSciAgent_DeepSeek
- 70.9 Claude Opus 4.7
- 67.3 Claude Opus 4.8
- 67.2 Kimi K2.5
- 65.7 deepseek-chat1
- 65.5 Claude Opus 4.5
- 65.3
DeepSeek-V3.2
- 64.8 Haiyue-Ch1
- 64.5 meta-llama/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
- 64.3 o1-preview
- 64.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 63.7 DeepSeek R1 (snapshot unspecified)
- 63.4 GPT-5 nano
- 63.1 gpt-oss-120b
- 62.5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified)
- 62.5 DeepSeek-V3-0324-W8A8-1
- 62.5 Claude-3.5 (Sonnet) React
- 62.1 deepseek-v3-1-w4a8-1
- 61.8 DeepSeek-V3-0324-MTP1
- 61.2 gpt-oss-20b
- 61.1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 61.1 Qwen3-235B-A22B-2507
- 61.0
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B
- 59.8 K2-Horizon-7B
- 59.7 Kimi K2
- 59.3 GLM-5
- 57.9 Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct
- 57.0
Mistral Large 2
- 57.0 Claude 3 Opus
- 56.9 PaperQA2
- 55.3 NVIDIA Nemotron Super 3 120B
- 53.4 Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct
- 52.9
Qwen2.5-32B
- 51.8 Llama-3-70B-Instruct
- 51.6 Llama-3-70B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0)
- 51.1 Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0)
- 50.5 GPT-4o React
- 50.3 GPT-4o mini
- 50.0 Claude 3 Haiku
- 48.2 Gemma-2-9B-it
- 48.0 Gemma-2-9B-it (Temperature 1.0)
- 47.5
phi-3-medium 14B
- 47.4 Claude 2
- 47.2 NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 3 30B
- 47.2 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
- 46.6 ChemPile-LoRA-Ensemble
- 46.6 GPT-3.5 Turbo (snapshot unspecified)
- 46.1 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0)
- 45.7 Llama-3-8B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0)
- 45.5 Llama-3-8B-Instruct
- 45.3
Gemini 1.0 Pro
- 44.8
Command R+
- 43.5
MiniMax-M2.5
- 42.7 qwen2.5-instruct
- 42.6 inspect_file_test
- 42.6 inspect_test_2
- 42.4 Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct
- 42.2 kunlun-70b-1
- 41.8 Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct (Temperature 1.0)
- 41.3 GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified)
- 26.6 Llama-2-70B Chat
- 25.5 Llama-2-13B Chat
- 21.9 olympiad
- 19.2
Gemma 1.1 7B IT
- 19.1 Gemma-1.1-7B-it (Temperature 1.0)
- 4.02 Llama-2-7b-chat-hf
- 1.51 Galactica-120b
- 1 NexusSciAgent self-reported, no tools 86%
- 2 NexusSciAgent_DeepSeek self-reported, no tools 71.2%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.7 verified, no tools 70.9%
- 4 Claude Opus 4.8 verified, no tools 67.3%
- 5 Kimi K2.5 verified, no tools 67.2%
- 6 deepseek-chat1 self-reported, no tools 65.7%
- 7 Claude Opus 4.5 verified, no tools 65.5%
- 8
DeepSeek-V3.2 verified, no tools 65.3%
- 9 Haiyue-Ch1 self-reported, no tools 64.8%
- 10 meta-llama/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct verified, no tools 64.5%
- 11 o1-preview verified, no tools 64.3%
- 12
Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025, verified, no tools 64.1%
- 13 DeepSeek R1 (snapshot unspecified) verified, no tools 63.7%
- 14 GPT-5 nano verified, no tools 63.4%
- 15 gpt-oss-120b verified, no tools 63.1%
- 16 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) verified, no tools 62.5%
- 17 DeepSeek-V3-0324-W8A8-1 self-reported, no tools 62.5%
- 18 Claude-3.5 (Sonnet) React verified, tools 62.5%
- 19 deepseek-v3-1-w4a8-1 self-reported, no tools 62.1%
- 20 DeepSeek-V3-0324-MTP1 self-reported, no tools 61.8%
- 21 gpt-oss-20b verified, no tools 61.2%
- 22 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) verified, no tools 61.1%
- 23 Qwen3-235B-A22B-2507 verified, no tools 61.1%
- 24
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B verified, no tools 61%
- 25 K2-Horizon-7B self-reported, no tools 59.8%
- 26 Kimi K2 Sep 2025, verified, no tools 59.7%
- 27 GLM-5 verified, no tools 59.3%
- 28 Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct verified, no tools 57.9%
- 29
Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024, verified, no tools 57%
- 30 Claude 3 Opus verified, no tools 57%
- 31 PaperQA2 verified, tools 56.9%
- 32 NVIDIA Nemotron Super 3 120B verified, no tools 55.3%
- 33 Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct verified, no tools 53.4%
- 34
Qwen2.5-32B verified, no tools 52.9%
- 35 Llama-3-70B-Instruct verified, no tools 51.8%
- 36 Llama-3-70B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 51.6%
- 37 Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 51.1%
- 38 GPT-4o React verified, tools 50.5%
- 39 GPT-4o mini verified, no tools 50.3%
- 40 Claude 3 Haiku verified, no tools 50%
- 41 Gemma-2-9B-it verified, no tools 48.2%
- 42 Gemma-2-9B-it (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 48%
- 43
phi-3-medium 14B verified, no tools 47.5%
- 44 Claude 2 verified, no tools 47.4%
- 45 NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 3 30B verified, no tools 47.2%
- 46 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct verified, no tools 47.2%
- 47 ChemPile-LoRA-Ensemble verified, no tools 46.6%
- 48 GPT-3.5 Turbo (snapshot unspecified) verified, no tools 46.6%
- 49 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 46.1%
- 50 Llama-3-8B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 45.7%
- 51 Llama-3-8B-Instruct verified, no tools 45.5%
- 52
Gemini 1.0 Pro verified, no tools 45.3%
- 53
Command R+ verified, no tools 44.8%
- 54
MiniMax-M2.5 verified, no tools 43.5%
- 55 qwen2.5-instruct verified, no tools 42.7%
- 56 inspect_file_test verified, no tools 42.6%
- 57 inspect_test_2 verified, no tools 42.6%
- 58 Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct verified, no tools 42.4%
- 59 kunlun-70b-1 verified, no tools 42.2%
- 60 Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 41.8%
- 61 GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) verified, no tools 41.3%
- 62 Llama-2-70B Chat verified, no tools 26.6%
- 63 Llama-2-13B Chat verified, no tools 25.5%
- 64 olympiad verified, no tools 21.9%
- 65
Gemma 1.1 7B IT verified, no tools 19.2%
- 66 Gemma-1.1-7B-it (Temperature 1.0) verified, no tools 19.1%
- 67 Llama-2-7b-chat-hf verified, no tools 4.02%
- 68 Galactica-120b verified, no tools 1.51%
Source: Official ChemBench leaderboard
- 83.4
Intern-S1
- 70.9 Claude Opus 4.7
- 67.3 Claude Opus 4.8
- 67.2 Kimi K2.5
- 65.5 Claude Opus 4.5
- 65.3
DeepSeek-V3.2
- 64.3 o1-preview
- 64.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 63.4 GPT-5 nano
- 63.1 gpt-oss-120b
- 61.2 gpt-oss-20b
- 61.0
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B
- 59.7 Kimi K2
- 59.3 GLM-5
- 57.0
Mistral Large 2
- 57.0 Claude 3 Opus
- 52.9
Qwen2.5-32B
- 50.3 GPT-4o mini
- 50.0 Claude 3 Haiku
- 47.5
phi-3-medium 14B
- 47.4 Claude 2
- 45.3
Gemini 1.0 Pro
- 44.8
Command R+
- 43.5
MiniMax-M2.5
- 19.2
Gemma 1.1 7B IT
- 1
Intern-S1 83.4%
- 2 Claude Opus 4.7 verified, no tools 70.9%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.8 verified, no tools 67.3%
- 4 Kimi K2.5 verified, no tools 67.2%
- 5 Claude Opus 4.5 verified, no tools 65.5%
- 6
DeepSeek-V3.2 verified, no tools 65.3%
- 7 o1-preview verified, no tools 64.3%
- 8
Gemini 2.5 Flash Apr 2025, verified, no tools 64.1%
- 9 GPT-5 nano verified, no tools 63.4%
- 10 gpt-oss-120b verified, no tools 63.1%
- 11 gpt-oss-20b verified, no tools 61.2%
- 12
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B verified, no tools 61%
- 13 Kimi K2 Sep 2025, verified, no tools 59.7%
- 14 GLM-5 verified, no tools 59.3%
- 15
Mistral Large 2 Nov 2024, verified, no tools 57%
- 16 Claude 3 Opus verified, no tools 57%
- 17
Qwen2.5-32B verified, no tools 52.9%
- 18 GPT-4o mini verified, no tools 50.3%
- 19 Claude 3 Haiku verified, no tools 50%
- 20
phi-3-medium 14B verified, no tools 47.5%
- 21 Claude 2 verified, no tools 47.4%
- 22
Gemini 1.0 Pro verified, no tools 45.3%
- 23
Command R+ verified, no tools 44.8%
- 24
MiniMax-M2.5 verified, no tools 43.5%
- 25
Gemma 1.1 7B IT verified, no tools 19.2%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official ChemBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NexusSciAgent | 86% | self-reported, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | NexusSciAgent_DeepSeek | 71.2% | self-reported, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 70.9% | verified, no tools | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 67.3% | verified, no tools | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Kimi K2.5 | 67.2% | verified, no tools | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | deepseek-chat1 | 65.7% | self-reported, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 65.5% | verified, no tools | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 65.3% | verified, no tools | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Haiyue-Ch1 | 64.8% | self-reported, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | meta-llama/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct | 64.5% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | o1-preview | 64.3% | verified, no tools | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 64.1% | verified, no tools | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | DeepSeek R1 (snapshot unspecified) | 63.7% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | GPT-5 nano | 63.4% | verified, no tools | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | gpt-oss-120b | 63.1% | verified, no tools | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) | 62.5% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | DeepSeek-V3-0324-W8A8-1 | 62.5% | self-reported, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Claude-3.5 (Sonnet) React | 62.5% | verified, tools, ReAct-style harness: interleaves chain-of-thought reasoning with tool-use actions, observing each tool's result before deciding the next step, rather than answering in a single forward pass. Yao et al. 2022, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | deepseek-v3-1-w4a8-1 | 62.1% | self-reported, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | DeepSeek-V3-0324-MTP1 | 61.8% | self-reported, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | gpt-oss-20b | 61.2% | verified, no tools | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 61.1% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | Qwen3-235B-A22B-2507 | 61.1% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | | 61% | verified, no tools | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | K2-Horizon-7B | 59.8% | self-reported, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | 59.7% | verified, no tools | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 27 | GLM-5 | 59.3% | verified, no tools | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 28 | Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct | 57.9% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 29 | | 57% | verified, no tools | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 30 | Claude 3 Opus | 57% | verified, no tools | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 31 | PaperQA2 | 56.9% | verified, tools, PaperQA agent: retrieval-augmented QA over full-text scientific literature. It retrieves candidate papers/passages, assesses their relevance, gathers evidence, and synthesizes a cited answer — iterating retrieval and evidence steps rather than answering in one shot. Lála et al. 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07559 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | NVIDIA Nemotron Super 3 120B | 55.3% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct | 53.4% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 52.9% | verified, no tools | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 35 | Llama-3-70B-Instruct | 51.8% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | Llama-3-70B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) | 51.6% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 37 | Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) | 51.1% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 38 | GPT-4o React | 50.5% | verified, tools, ReAct-style harness: interleaves chain-of-thought reasoning with tool-use actions, observing each tool's result before deciding the next step, rather than answering in a single forward pass. Yao et al. 2022, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629 | Official leaderboard | |
| 39 | GPT-4o mini | 50.3% | verified, no tools | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 40 | Claude 3 Haiku | 50% | verified, no tools | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 41 | Gemma-2-9B-it | 48.2% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 42 | Gemma-2-9B-it (Temperature 1.0) | 48% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 43 | | 47.5% | verified, no tools | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 44 | Claude 2 | 47.4% | verified, no tools | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 45 | NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 3 30B | 47.2% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 46 | Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | 47.2% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 47 | ChemPile-LoRA-Ensemble | 46.6% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 48 | GPT-3.5 Turbo (snapshot unspecified) | 46.6% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 49 | Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) | 46.1% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 50 | Llama-3-8B-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) | 45.7% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 51 | Llama-3-8B-Instruct | 45.5% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 52 | | 45.3% | verified, no tools | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 53 | | 44.8% | verified, no tools | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 54 | | 43.5% | verified, no tools | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 55 | qwen2.5-instruct | 42.7% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 56 | inspect_file_test | 42.6% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 57 | inspect_test_2 | 42.6% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 58 | Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct | 42.4% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 59 | kunlun-70b-1 | 42.2% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 60 | Mixtral-8x7b-Instruct (Temperature 1.0) | 41.8% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 61 | GPT-4 (snapshot unspecified) | 41.3% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 62 | Llama-2-70B Chat | 26.6% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 63 | Llama-2-13B Chat | 25.5% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 64 | olympiad | 21.9% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 65 | | 19.2% | verified, no tools | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 66 | Gemma-1.1-7B-it (Temperature 1.0) | 19.1% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 67 | Llama-2-7b-chat-hf | 4.02% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard | |
| 68 | Galactica-120b | 1.51% | verified, no tools | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 83.4% | Jul 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 70.9% | verified, no tools | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 67.3% | verified, no tools | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Kimi K2.5 | 67.2% | verified, no tools | Jan 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 65.5% | verified, no tools | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 65.3% | verified, no tools | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | o1-preview | 64.3% | verified, no tools | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 64.1% | verified, no tools | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | GPT-5 nano | 63.4% | verified, no tools | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | gpt-oss-120b | 63.1% | verified, no tools | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | gpt-oss-20b | 61.2% | verified, no tools | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 61% | verified, no tools | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | 59.7% | verified, no tools | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | GLM-5 | 59.3% | verified, no tools | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 57% | verified, no tools | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 16 | Claude 3 Opus | 57% | verified, no tools | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 52.9% | verified, no tools | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | GPT-4o mini | 50.3% | verified, no tools | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 19 | Claude 3 Haiku | 50% | verified, no tools | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 20 | | 47.5% | verified, no tools | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 21 | Claude 2 | 47.4% | verified, no tools | Jul 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 22 | | 45.3% | verified, no tools | Dec 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| 23 | | 44.8% | verified, no tools | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | | 43.5% | verified, no tools | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | | 19.2% | verified, no tools | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
5 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in April 2024 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in April 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official ChemBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official ChemBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
No launch post has listed it since July 2025
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2025 | 83.4 | ChemBench |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2025 | | 83.4 | ChemBench, Mirza et al. (Table 3) | Capabilities |
More in Science and reasoning
- GPQA Diamond In use 198 graduate-level 'Google-proof' multiple-choice questions in biology, chemistry and physics.
Gemini 4 Carbon 96.5%
- Terminal-Bench-Science In use 70 scientific research-workflow tasks across five science areas, run in Harbor containers. Hidden tests give the resolution rate. GPT-6 Astra 68.1%
- FrontierScience In use Models solve physics, chemistry, and biology problems in an Olympiad track graded by short answer and a Research track graded by 10-point rubrics.
Intern-S2-397B 87%
- BioMysteryBench In use Bioinformatics problems on anonymized real datasets that require real analysis with tools. Rubric-graded, with human-solvable and human-difficult splits. Claude Fable 5.2 83.7%
- HiPhO In use Models solve theory problems from 2024 and 2025 physics olympiad exams, some with diagrams. Official marking schemes grade answers and steps, mapped to medal levels.
Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
- LABBench2 In use 11 biology research sub-tasks (literature, figures, tables, patents, trials and more) with tool access. Macro-averaged accuracy. GPT-5.2 60.9%